Advertisement

Constitutive Relationship of Recycled Aggregate Concrete

  • Jianzhuang XiaoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the constitutive relationships of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), including the static compressive stress–strain curve without/with confinements (confined by steel tubes and by glassfiber-reinforced plastic tubes) under axial compressive loading, the tensile stress–strain curve of RAC under axial tension loading, the shear transfer behavior across cracks of RAC as well as the compressive behavior of RAC under high strain rate loading. The influences of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) influences strength, elastic modulus, peak and ultimate strength of RAC were evaluated. For the case of dynamic constitutive relationship of RAC, the effects of strain rate on failure pattern, compressive strength, initial elastic modulus, and peak strain were studied. Based on the constitutive relationships of RAC in this chapter, the related simulation studies can be executed.

References

  1. 1.
    Guo Z. Strength and constitutive relation of concrete: principles and applications. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rqhl M, Atkinson G. The influence of recycled aggregate concrete on the stress–strain relation of concrete. Darmstadt concrete, vol. 14, TU, Darmstadt, Germany; 1999 (only available in German).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu Q, Can S, Zou CY. Experimental research on the mechanical properties of recycled concrete. J Harbin Inst Tech. 2009;41:33–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MOHURD. GB/T 25177-2010 recycled coarse aggregate for concrete. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao JZ, Li L, Shen L, Poon CS. Compressive behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete under impact loading. Cem Concr Res. 2015;71:46–55.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiao JZ, Li L, Shen LM, Yuan JQ. Effects of strain rate on mechanical behavior of modeled recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial compression. Constr Build Mater. 2015;93:214–22.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiao J, Li J, Zhang C. Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(6):1187–94.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlangen E. Experimental and numerical analysis of the fracture process of concrete. Ph.D. thesis. Delft University; 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM. Simple lattice model for numerical simulation of fracture of concrete materials and structures. Mater Struct. 1992;25:534–42.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu F. Experimental study and theoretical analysis of concrete filled in PVC-FRP tube columns mechanical properties. Xi’an (China): Xi’an Architecture and Technology University; 2007 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding X. Study on the mechanical behavior and design method of concrete filled circular steel tubular structures. Changsha (China): Central South University; 2006 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu F, Niu D. Bearing capacity of FRP-confined concrete column subjected to axial compression. Concrete. 2007;3:14–6 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ding X, Yu Z. Theoretical analysis of mechanical properties of concrete filled tubular steel tube columns. Eng Mech. 2005;22(3):175–81 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ottosen NS. Constitutive model for short-time loading of concrete. ASCE. 1979;105(EM1):127–41.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu Z, Ding X. Unified conclusion method of compressive mechanical properties of concrete. J Build Struct. 2003;24(4):41–6 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farids MN, Khalili H. FRP-encased concrete as a structural material. Mag Concr Res. 1982;34(121):191–202.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiao JZ, Li WG, Sun Z. Crack propagation in recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial compressive loading. ACI Mater J. 2012;110 (in press).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiao JZ, Li WG, Fan YH, Huang X. A review of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China (1996–2011). Constr Build Mater. 2012;29 (in press).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Etxeberria M, Vázquez E, Marí A, Barra M. Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2007;37:735–42.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Concrete Institute (ACI). Building code requirements for structural concrete. No. 318-2005, Committee 318, Farmington, Hills, Mich; 2005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI). PCI design handbook. 4th ed. Chicago: PCI; 1992.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gu X. The basic principle of concrete structures. Shanghai: Tongji University Press; 2011 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mattock AH. Shear friction and high-strength concrete. ACI J. 2001;69:50–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mansur MA, Vinayagam T, Tan K-H. Shear transfer across a crack in reinforced high-strength concrete. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE. 2008;20:294–302.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loov R, Patnaik A. Horizontal shear strength of composite concrete beams with rough interface. PCI J. 1994;39:48–67.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abrams DA. Effect of rate of application of load on the compressive strength of concrete. Proc. ASTM. 1917;17:364–5.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harsh S, Shen ZJ, Darwin D. Strain-rate sensitive behavior of cement paste and mortar in compression. ACI Mater J. 1990;87(5):508–16.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ross CA, Tedesco JW, Kuennen ST. Effects of strain-rate on concrete strength. ACI Mater J. 1995;92(1):37–47.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xiao SY, Li HN, Monteiro P. Influence of strain rates and loading histories on the compressive damage behaviour of concrete. Mag Concr Res. 2011;63(12):915–26.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chakradhara Rao M, Bhattacharyya SK, Barai SV. Behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete under drop weight impact load. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(1):69–80.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lu YB, Chen X, Teng X, Zhang S. Dynamic compressive behavior of recycled aggregate concrete based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Lat Am J Solids Struct. 2014;11:131–41.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang S, Zhang MH, Quek ST. Effect of specimen size on static strength in dynamic increase factor of high-strength concrete strength from SHPB test. J Test Eval. 2011;39(5):898–907.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Mier JGM, Shah SP, Arnaud M, et al. Strain-softening of concrete in uniaxial compression. Mater Struct. 1997;30:195–209.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen XD, Wu SX, Zhou JK. Experimental and modeling study of dynamic mechanical properties of cement paste, mortar and concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;47:419–30.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Xiao JZ, Li WG, Sun ZH, Lange DA, Shah SP. Crack propagation in recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial compressive loading. ACI Mater J. 2012;109(4):451–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations