Zusammenfassung
Virtuelle Projektteams können die jeweils besten Fachleute für eine Aufgabe unabhängig von räumlichen und zeitlichen Grenzen zusammenführen. Gleichzeitig ist das Management virtueller Projektteams aufgrund eingeschränkter Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten und geringer persönlicher Kontakte mit besonderen Herausforderungen verbunden. Mithilfe arbeits- und organisationspsychologischer Forschungsergebnisse werden diese Schwierigkeiten erklärt, und es werden konkrete Strategien vorgeschlagen, um virtuelle Projektarbeit erfolgreich zu meistern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339–353.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ellwart, T., Happ, C., Gutrner, A., & Rack, O. (2015). Managing information overload in virtual teams: Effects of a structured online team adaptation on cognition and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 8126.
Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37, 459–489.
Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014). Where global and virtual meet: The value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first-century teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 2144.
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2014). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313–1337.
Hertel, G. (2002). Management virtueller Teams auf der Basis sozialpsychologischer Theorien: Das VIST Modell. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie wirtschaftlicher Prozesse (S. 172–202). Lengerich: Pabst Verlag.
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95.
Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1–28.
Hertel, G., Orlikowski, B., Jokisch, W., Schöckel, D. & Haardt, C. (2004). Entwicklung, Durchführung und Evaluation eines Basistrainings für virtuelle Teams bei der Siemens AG. In G. Hertel & U. Konradt (Hrsg.), Human Resource Management im Inter- und Intranet (S. 313–325). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Voss, K. (2006). Competencies for virtual teamwork: Development and validation of a web-based selection tool for members of distributed teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 477–504.
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175–192.
Konradt, U. & Hertel, G. (2007). Telekooperation und virtuelle Teamarbeit. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.
Konradt, U., Schippers, M. C., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 7795.
Krumm, S., & Hertel, G. (2013). Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Characteristics (KSAOs) for Virtual Teamwork. In A. Bakker & D. Derks (Eds.), The Psychology of Digital Media and Work (pp. 89). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2006). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 60–70.
Maruping, L.M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 975–990.
Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, A.P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251–1262.
Ortiz de Guinea, A., Webster, J., & Staples, S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49, 3008.
Perry, S. J., Lorinkova, N. M., Hunter, E. M., Hubbard, A., & McMahon, J. T. (2013). When does virtuality really “work”? Examining the role of work–family and virtuality in social loafing. Journal of Management, ‘DOI: 0149206313475814.
Rosen, B., Furst, S., & Blackburn, R. (2006). Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs. Human Resource Management, 45, 229–247.
Wegge, J., Bipp, T., & Kleinbeck, U. (2007). Goal setting via videoconferencing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 169–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hertel, G., Orlikowski, B. (2018). Projektmanagement in ortsverteilten „virtuellen“ Teams. In: Wastian, M., Braumandl, I., von Rosenstiel, L., West, M. (eds) Angewandte Psychologie für das Projektmanagement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53929-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53929-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53928-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53929-3
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)