Advertisement

Die Bioökonomie unter dem Blickwinkel der Innovationsökonomie

  • Andreas Pyka
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung darf nicht nur – wie in der neoklassischen Ökonomik – an quantitativen Wachstumsmaßstäben gemessen werden. Vielmehr muss sie – in Anknüpfung an die Schumpetersche Ökonomik – auch nach der qualitativen Veränderung grundlegender wirtschaftlicher Strukturen über längere Zeiträume hinweg beurteilt werden. Insbesondere der Übergang in eine wissensbasierte Bioökonomie, bei dem es sich um einen radikalen, langfristigen Transformationsprozess handelt, sollte in diesem Sinn betrachtet werden. Dieses Kapitel verfolgt deshalb einen innovationsökonomischen Ansatz, um die bevorstehenden Wandlungsprozesse angemessen zu skizzieren und in den generellen Kontext einer Ökonomie des Wandels zu stellen. Wachstumsoptimistisch beleuchtet es das Zusammenspiel unterschiedlicher Akteure in wissensintensiven Innovationssystemen und fragt nach den Bedingungen für Konzepte, die ganze Volkwirtschaften auf einen neuen Entwicklungspfad bringen können.

Literatur

  1. Audretsch D, Feldman MP (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev Ind Organ 11(2):253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blewitt J, Cunningham R (Hrsg) (2014) The Post-Growth Project: how the end of economic growth could bring a fairer and happier society. Green House, e-prints, AstonGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt RS (2004) Structural Holes and Good Ideas. Am J Sociol 110(2):349–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casper S, Lehrer M, Soskice D (1999) Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Ind Innov 6(1):114–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deffuant G, Huet S, Amblard F (2005) An Individual-Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit. Am J Sociol 110(4):1041–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (1988) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Europäisches Parlament (2013) Verordnung Nr. 1296/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Dezember 2013 über ein Programm der Europäischen Union für Beschäftigung und soziale Innovation (″EaSI″). Brüssel. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013R1296
  9. Foray D, David PA, Hall B (2009) Smart specialization – the Concept. Knowl Econ Policy Brief 9. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/monitoring/knowledge_en.htm
  10. Freeman C (1991) Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Res Policy 20(5):499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8):1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green L, Pyka A, Schön B (2013) A life-cycle based taxonomy of innovation networks – with focus on public-private collaboration. In: Gallouj F, Rubalcaba L, Windrum P (Hrsg) Public-Private Innovation Networks in Services. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, S 113–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall PA, Soskice D (Hrsg) Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. University Press, Oxford, S 1–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanusch H, Pyka A (2013) Social innovations in the perspective of Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. In: Ruiz Viñals C, Parra Rodríguez C (Hrsg) Social Innovation – New forms of organization in knowledge-based societies. Routledge, London, S 29–43Google Scholar
  15. Howells J (2002) The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition–does the sailing ship effect exist? J Manag Stud 39(7):887–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kallis G, Kerschner C, Martinez-Alier J (2014) The economics of degrowth. Ecol Econ 84:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klepper S (1997) Industry Life Cycle. Ind Corp Chang 6(1):145–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner& Marx, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundvall B-A (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers., LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundvall B-A (1998) Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technol Analysis Strateg Manag 10(4):403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mazzucato M, Perez C (2015) Innovation as growth policy. In: Fagerberg J, Laestadius S, Martin BR (Hrsg) The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change, and Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, S 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Martin BR (2010) Technology Policy and Global Warming: Why new Policy Models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles would not work). Res Policy 39:1011–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (MA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nyblom J, Borgatti S, Roslakka J, Salo MA (2003) Statistical analysis of network data - an application to diffusion of innovation. Soc Networks 25(2):175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pyka A (2002) Innovation Networks in Economics – From the incentive-based to the knowledge-based Approaches. Eur J Innov Manag 5(3):152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pyka A (2017) The transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy. In: Dabbert S et al (Hrsg) Strategies for Knowledge-driven Developments in the Bioeconomy – an international and interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Pyka A, Buchmann T (2017) Die Transformation zur wissensbasierten Bioökonomie. In: Burr W, Stephan M (Hrsg) Technologie, Strategie und Organisation. Springer, Berlin und HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  30. Pérez C (2010) Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge J Econ 34(1):185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pérez C (2014) Financial bubbles, crises and the role of government in unleashing golden ages. In: Pyka A, Burghof H-P (Hrsg) Innovation and Finance. Routledge, Milton Park, S 11–25Google Scholar
  32. Robertson M, Swan J, Newell S (1996) The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. J Manag Stud 33:333–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sahal D (1985) Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Res Policy 14(2):61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schomberg R von (2011) Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation, in: Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, S 39–61Google Scholar
  35. Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, President and Fellows of Harvard College. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, U.S.Google Scholar
  36. Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Unruh CG (2000) Undesrtanding Carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28:817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valente TW (1996) Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc Networks 18(1):69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weizsäcker E von (2010) Introduction, Factor Five: The Global Imperative. In: Von Weizsäcker E et al (Hrsg) Factor Five – Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity. Earthscan, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, S 1–19Google Scholar
  41. Whitley R (1999) Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manag J 26(9):809–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Pyka
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für VolkswirtschaftslehreUniversität HohenheimHohenheimDeutschland

Personalised recommendations