Abstract
This chapter addresses the pure likelihood approach to model choice . The concepts of normalized , adjusted , relative , and profile likelihood are introduced. A relative likelihood approach for discriminating separate models is presented using an example. The concepts of computer simulations , the Monte Carlo method, Monte Carlo simulations , and bootstrapping are described. Linear and nonlinear regression models in the literature are used as illustrations. An example is presented to demonstrate the use of a likelihood dominance criterion (LDC) for model choice .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnard, G.A., Jenkins, G.M., Winstein, C.B.: Likelihood inference and time series (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 13, 351–352 (1962)
Cole, T.J.: Linear and proportional regression models in the prediction of ventilatory function (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A 138, 297–338 (1975)
Coulibaly, N., Brorsen, B.W.: A Monte Carlo sampling approach to testing nonnested hypotheses: Monte Carlo results. Econ. Rev. 18, 195–209 (1999)
Cox, D.R.: Further results on test of separate families of hypotheses. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 406–424 (1962)
Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life table (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 34, 187–200 (1972)
Cox, D.R.: A return to an old paper: tests of separate families of hypotheses (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 75, 207–215 (2013)
Cribari-Neto, F., Lucena, S.E.F.: Nonnested hypothesis testing in the class of varying disperson beta regressions. J. Appl. Stat. 42, 967–985 (2015)
Edwards, A.W.F.: Likelihood. The John Hopkins University Press (1992)
Fisher, R. A.: Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Hafner Press Macmillan Publishing (1956)
Jackson, O.A.Y.: Some Tests Associated with the Exponential Distribution. Ph.D Thesis (Statistics), Imperial College, University of London (1967)
Jackson, O.A.Y.: Some results on tests of separate families of hypotheses. Biometrika 55, 355–363 (1968)
Kalbfleisch, J.G.: Probability and Statistical Inference, vol. 2. Springer, Satatistical Inference (2011)
King, G.: Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. University of Michigan Press (1998)
Lindsey, J.K.: Comparison of probability distributions. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 36, 38–47 (1974a)
Lindsey, J.K.: Construction and comparison of statistical models. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 36, 418–425 (1974b)
Lindsey, J.K.: Parametric Statistical Inference. Oxford University Press (1986)
Loh, W.Y.: A new method for testing separate families of hypotheses. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 80, 362–368 (1985)
McCullag, P., Nelder, J.: Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall (1989)
Nevill, A.M., Holder, R.L.: Modelling maximum oxygen uptake-a case study in non-linear regression model formulation and comparison. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C (Appl. Stat.) 43, 653–666 (1994)
Pawitan, Y.: In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood. Oxford University Press (2001)
Pereira, B.B.: Some Results on Test of Separate Families of Hypotheses. Ph.D Thesis (Statistics), Imperial College, University of London (1976)
Pereira, B.B.: Empirical comparisons of some tests of separate families of hypotheses. Metrika 25, 219–234 (1981)
Pereira, B.B., Pereira, C.A.B.: A likelihood approach to diagnostic test in clinical medicine. REVSTAT-Stat. J. 3, 77–98 (2005)
Pesaran, M.H., Pesaran, B.: A simulation approach to the problem of computing Cox’s statistics for testing nonested models. J. Econ. 57, 377–392 (1993)
Pesaran, M.H., Pesaran, B.: A nonnested test of level differenced versus log-differenced stationary models. Econ. Rev. 14, 213–227 (1995)
Pollack, R.A., Wales, T.J.: The likelihood dominance criterion: a new method to model selection. J. Econ. 47, 227–242 (1991)
Rojas, F.A.R.: Evaluation of test of separate hypotheses, Ph.D. Thesis (Operational Research). COPPE/UFRJ-Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (2001) (In Portuguese)
Royall, R.M.: Statistical Evidence: A likelihood Paradigm. Chapman & Hall (1999)
Sawilosky, S.S.: You think you’ve got trivials. J. Modern Appl. Stat. Methods 2, 218–225 (2003)
Schork, N.: Combining Monte Carlo and Cox tests of non-nested hypotheses. Commun. Stat. Simul. 24, 939–954 (1993)
Schork, N., Schork, M.A.: Testing separate families of segregation hypotheses: Bootstrap methods. Am. J. Human Genet. 45, 803–813 (1989)
Schork, N., Weder, A.B., Schork, M.A.: On the asymmetry of biological frequency distributions. Genet. Epidemiol. 7, 427–446 (1990)
Sprott, D.A.: Statistical Inference in Science. Springer, New York (2000)
Wahrendorf, J., Becher, H., Brown, C.C.: Bootstrap comparison of non-nested generalized linear models: applications in survival anylis and epidemiology. Appl. Stat. 36, 72–81 (1987)
Williams, D.A.: Discrimination between regression models to determine the pattern of enzyme synthesis in synchronous cell culture. Biometrics 70, 23–32 (1970)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pereira, B., Pereira, C. (2016). Support and Simulation Methods. In: Model Choice in Nonnested Families. SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53736-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53736-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53735-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53736-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)