Abstract
The trend away from highly automated processes using heavy industrial robots towards HRI-systems (human-robot-interaction) using light-weight robots, is leading to a strong increase concerning the technical complexity of future industrial work systems. This article reports the results of an experimental evaluation of a multimodal human-robot-interface. Two typical application scenarios from the robot programming were examined, each performed with three different modalities of control. The mental workload of the operators was operationalized by subjective, objective and physiological indicators. There were significant differences in mental workload between the different types of control in both application scenarios. The present results demonstrate the benefits of adaptive system design in human-robot-interaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arenius M (2009) Getting the feeling – “Human Error” in an educational ship-handling simulator. Magisterarbeit. University Linköping, Linköping. Institut of Computer Science, checked on 1/24/2016
Backs R, Walrath L (1992) Eye movement and pupillary response indices of mental workload during visual search of symbolic displays. Appl Ergon 23:243–254
Beatty J, Lucero-Wagoner B (2007) The pupillary system. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 142–162
Benedetto S, Pedrotty M, Minin L, Baccino T, Re A, Montanari R (2011) Driver workload and eye blink duration. Transport Res 14:199–208
Brookhuis K, de Waard D (2010) Monitoring drivers’ mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accid Anal Prev 42:898–903
Cardona G, Quevedo N (2014) Blinking and driving: the influence of saccades and cognitive workload. Curr Eye Res 39:239–244
Di Nocera F, Camilli M, Terenzi M (2007) A random glance on the flight deck: pilots’ scanning strategies and real-time assessment of mental workload. Edited by University of Rome, Rome
Driver MJ, Mock TJ (1975) Human information processing, decision style theory, and accounting information systems. The Account Rev 50:490–508, checked on 2/3/2016
Fels M, Bauer R, Gharabaghi A (2015) Predicting workload profiles of brain–robot interface and electromyographic neurofeedback with cortical resting-state networks. Personal trait or task-specific challenge? J Neural Eng 12(4):46029, DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046029
Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25
Haddadin S (ed) (2014) Towards safe robots. Approaching Asimov’s 1st law. Springer, Heidelberg (Springer tracts in advanced robotics, 90)
Halverson T, Estepp J, Christensen J, Monnin J (2012) Classifying Workload with eye movements in a complex task. Proceedings of the Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58:168–172
Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North Holland Press, Amsterdam
Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (Prentice-Hall series in experimental psychology), checked on 1/20/2016
Loewenfeld I (1993) The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Iowa State University, Ames
Manzey D (1998) Psychophysiologie mentaler Beanspruchung. In: Rößler F (ed) Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Ergebnisse und Anwendungen der Psychophysiologie, vol 5, 5th edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 799–864
Marshall SP (2000) Method and apparatus for eye tracking and monitoring pupil dilation to evaluate cognitive activity on 7/18/2000. Patent no. 6.090.051
Marshall SP (2002) The index of cognitive activity: measuring cognitive workload. IEEE Human Factors Meeting, 7, Scottsdale
Marshall SP (2007) Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. Aviat Space Environ Med 78:165–175
Marshall SP, Pleydell-Pearce CW, Dickson BT (2003) Integrating psychophysiological measures of cognitive workload and eye movements to detect strategy shifts. In: Proceedings of the thirth-sixth annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA
Martens S, Wyble B (2010) The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:947–957
Martins R, Carvalho JM (2015) Eye blinking as an indicator of fatigue and mental load – a systematic review. In: Arezes PM (ed) Occupational safety and hygiene III. Selected extended and revised contributions from the International Symposium on Safety and Hygiene, Guimarães, Portugal, 12–13 February 2015. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 231–235
Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality. Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA
Neudörfer A (ed) (2014) Konstruieren sicherheitsgerechter Produkte. Methoden und systematische Lösungssammlungen zur EG-Maschinenrichtlinie. 6., aktual. Aufl. Springer Vieweg, Berlin (VDI-Buch)
Packebusch L (2003) Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung - Normung für die Praxis. In: Wirtschaftspsychologie aktuell. Arbeit und Gesundheit, vol 4, 4th edn. With assistance of R. Decker. Deutscher Psychologen Verlag GmbH, pp 32–36
Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction. An approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York (North-Holland series in system science and engineering, 12)
Rubio S, Díaz E, Martín J, Puente JM (2004) Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods. Appl Pyschol 53:61–86
Schneider M, Deml B (2016) An integrated approach to mental workload assessment. In: Deml B, Stock P, Bruder R, Schlick C (eds) Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of GfA 2015, vol 1, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 191–208
Schwalm M (2009) Pupillometrie als Methode zur Erfassung mentaler Beanspruchungen im automotive Kontext. Dissertation, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken
Spillner R (2015) Einsatz und Planung von Roboterassistenz zur Berücksichtigung von Leistungswandlungen in der Produktion. Utz, Wiss, München (IWB-Forschungsberichte, 296)
Steinhauer S, Siegle G, Condray R, Pless M (2004) Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. Int J Psychophysiol 52:77–86
Sträter O (2005) Cognition and safety An integrated approach to systems design and assessment. Ashgate, Aldershot
van Gaal S, Lamme VAF (2012) Unconscious high-level information processing: implication for neurobiological theories of consciousness. Neuroscientist 18:287–301
Watling C, Smith S (2013) In the blink of an eye: the circadian effects on ocular and subjective indices of driver sleepiness. Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing & Education Conference, Brisbane
Wickens CD (1984) Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman R, Davies DR (eds) Varieties of attention. Academic Press, London, pp 63–102
Wickens CD, Hollands JG, Banbury S, Parasuraman R (2013) Engineering psychology and human performance, 4th edn. Pearson, Boston, MA
Wilson GF (2009) An analysis of mental workload in pilots during flight using multiple psychophysiological measures. Int J Aviat Psychol 12:3–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schneider, M., Deml, B. (2017). Analysis of a Multimodal Human-Robot-Interface in Terms of Mental Workload. In: Schlick, C., et al. Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53305-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53305-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53304-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53305-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)