Advertisement

Microscopic Mechanism of Multiphase Fluids Flowing Through Rocks

  • Xuetao HuEmail author
  • Shuyong Hu
Chapter
Part of the Springer Mineralogy book series (MINERAL)

Abstract

In general, it is rare that there is only one phase fluid in hydrocarbon reservoir. Petroleum reservoirs contain at least two fluid phases in the porous rock: either oil and water or gas and water. In most cases, two-phase or multiphase immiscible fluids, such as oil and water, or gas and water, or oil, gas and water, coexist in reservoir.

Keywords

Contact Angle Interfacial Tension Capillary Pressure Relative Permeability Relative Permeability Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Professor H, Yidirim E (2006) Surface chemistry of solid and liquid interfaces. Blackwell PubGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aveyard R, Haydon DA (1973) An introduction to the principles of surface chemistry. University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He GS, Tang H (2011) Reservoir physics. Petroleum Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danesh A, University HW, Edinburgh AS (1998) PVT and phase behaviour of petroleum reservoir fluids. In: Developments in Petroleum ScienceGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katz DL, Monroe RR, Trainer RP (1943) Surface tension of crude oils containing dissolved gases. Pet Tech 1–10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hocott CR (1938) Interfacial tension between water and oil under reservoir conditions. Trans AIME J 132(1):184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Livingston HK (1938) Surface and interfacial tensions of oil-water systems in texas oil sands. Petrol Technol J 1(4):1–13Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    William C. Lyons (2009) Working guide to reservoir engineering, Gulf Professional PublishingGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hjelmeland OS, Larrondo LE (1986) Experimental investigation of the effects of temperature, pressure, and crude oil composition on interfacial properties [interfacial between crude oil and brine]. SPE Reservoir Eng J 1(4):321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Competition Science Vision (2004) 7(78):136 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glossary (2009) The brownfields and land revitalization technology support center. Retrieved 21 Dec 2009Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gurdeep R (2002) Surface chemistry. Krishna Prakashan MediaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banker GS, Siepmann J, Rhodes C (2002) Modern pharmaceutics. DekkerGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oura K, Lifshits VG, Saranin AA, Zotov AV, Katayama M (2003) Surface science, an introduction. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rouquerol J, Rouquerol F, Sing KSW (1999) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sivasankar (2008) Engineering chemistry. Tata McGraw-Hill EducationGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (1999) Adsorption by powders and porous solidsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tadros TF (2005) Applied surfactants: principles and applicationsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Criddle DW (1960) Rheology, theory and applications. In: Eirich FR (ed) Vol 3, Chapter 11. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fertl WH, Chilingarian GV (1989) evaluation and monitoring of enhanced oil recovery projects based on geophysical well logging techniques. Dev Pet Sci 17:451–494Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurier LS (2000) Surfactant: fundamentals and applications in the petroleum industryGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donaldson EC, Thomas RD (1971) Microscopic observations of oil displacement in water-wet and oil-wet systems. Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIMEGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Craig FF (1971) The reservoir engineering aspects of water flooding, Monograph series, SPE, Richardson, TX, p 3Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raza SH, Treiber LE, Archer DL (1968) Wettability of reservoir rocks and its evaluation. Prod Mon (United States) 32:4Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson GW (1986) Wettability literature survey-part 1: rock/oil/brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability. J Petrol TechnolGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Denekas MO et al (1959) Effect of crude oil components on rock wettability. Trans AIME J 216:330–333Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morrow NR, McCaffery FG (1976) Displacement studies in uniformly wetted porous media. Proc, Soc Chern Ind Inti Symposium on Wetting, Loughborough, U.K. (Sept. 27–29), pp 289–319Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johansen RT, Dunning HN (1958) Relative wetting tendencies of crude oils by the capillarimetric methodGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muecke TW (1979) Formation fines and factors controlling their movement in porous media. J Pet Technol 31(2):144–150Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Owens WW, Archer DL (1971) The effect of rock wettability on oil-water relative permeability relationships. SOC Petrol Eng JPT 71:873–878Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anderson WG (1986) Wettability literature survey-part 3: the effects of wettability on the electrical properties of porous media. J Petrol Technol J 38(12):1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang SL et al (2004) Reservoir physics. Petroleum Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Piper L (2003) Reservoir petrophysics. SpringGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leverett MC (1941) Capillary behavior in porous solids. Trans AIME J 142:152–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holmes M (2002) Capillary pressure & relative permeability: petrophysical reservoir models. Prepared by Michael Holmes. Digital Formation, Inc. Denver, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wardlaw NC, Taylor RP (1976) Mercury capillary pressure curves and the interpretation of pore structure and capillary behavior in reservoir rocks. Bull Can Petrol Geol J 24(2):225–262Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Donaldson EC, Lorenz PB, Thomas RD (1969) Wettability determination and its effect on recovery efficiency. SOC Petrol Eng J 9(1):13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Amaefule JO, Masuo ST (1986) Use of capillary pressure data for rapid evaluation of formation damage or Stimulation. SPE Production Engineering, SPE 12475Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Keelan DK, Koepf EH (1977) The role of cores and core analysis in evaluation of formation damage. Soc Petrol Eng JPT 482–490Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wardlaw NC (1980) The effects of pore structure on displacement efficiency in reservoir rocks and in glass micro-models. In: Paper SPE 8843 presented at the first joint SPE/DOE Sym on EOR held in Tulsa, OK, USA, April 20–23Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chatzis I, Morrow NR, Lim HT (1983) Magnitude and detailed structure of residual oil saturation. SPE 10681Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Leverett MC, Lewis WB (1941) Steady flow of gas-oil-water mixtures through unconsolidated sands. Trans AIME 142:107Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Delshad M, Pope GA (1989) Comparison of the three-phase oil relative permeability models. Transp Porous Media 4(1):59–83Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Geffen TM et al (1951) Experimental investigation of factors affecting laboratory permeability measurements. Trans AIME J 192:99–110Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Treiber LE, Archer DL, Owens WW (1972) A laboratory evaluation of the wettability of fifty oil producing reservoirs. Soc Pet Eng J 12(6):531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morgan JT, Gordon DT (1970) Influence of pore geometry on water-oil relative permeability. J Pet Technol 22(10):1199–1208Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nakornthap K, Evans RD (1986) Temperature-dependent relative permeability and its effect on oil displacement by thermal methods (Spe11217)Google Scholar
  48. 48.

Copyright information

© Petroleum Industry Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Oil & Natural Gas EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengdu, SichuanChina

Personalised recommendations