Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Industrie 4.0 Bd.2 pp 471–490Cite as

Datenanalyse in der intelligenten Fabrik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Technik ((VDISR))

Zusammenfassung

Die Mehrheit der Projekte zur Überwachung und Diagnose cyber-physischer Systeme (CPS) beruht auf von (menschlichen) Experten erstellten Modellen. Diese Modelle sind jedoch nur selten verfügbar, sind oft unvollständig, schwer zu überprüfen und zu warten. Datengetriebene Ansätze sind eine viel versprechende Alternative: Diese nutzen die großen Datenmengen die heutzutage in CPS gesammelt werden. Algorithmen verwenden die Daten, um die zur Überwachung notwendigen Modelle automatisch zu lernen. Dabei sind mehrere Herausforderungen zu bewältigen, wie zum Beispiel die Echtzeit-Datenerfassung und Speicherung, Datenanalyse, Mensch-Maschine Schnittstellen, Feedback- und Steuerungsmechanismen. In diesem Beitrag wird eine kognitive Referenzarchitektur vorgeschlagen um diese Herausforderungen in Zukunft einfacher zu lösen. Diese soll durch die Bereitstellung eines Vergleichsschemas sowohl die Wiederverwendung von Algorithmen erleichtern, als auch den wissenschaftlichen Diskurs unterstützen. Anwendungsfälle aus unterschiedlichen Branchen werden schematisch dargestellt und untermauern die Richtigkeit und den Nutzen der Architektur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Angluin D (1987) Learning regular sets from queries and counterexamples. Inf Comp 75(2):87–106

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Batanov D, Nagarur N, Nitikhunkasem P (1993) EXPERT-MM: a knowledge-based system for maintenance management. Artif Intell Eng 8(4):283–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954–1810(93)90012–5. – doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954–1810(93)90012–5. – ISSN 0954–1810

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry MJA, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques. Wiley Computer Publishing, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bista SK, Nepal S, Paris C (2013) Back to results data abstraction und visualisation in next step: experiences from a Government services delivery trial. Big Data Congress, Bd 1, S 263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke M, Kinnaert M, Lunze J, Staroswiecki M (2003) Diagnosis and fault-tolerant control, Bd 2 Springer-Verlag, S 1–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolchini C, Cassano L (2014) Machine learning-based techniques for incremental functional diagnosis: a comparative analysis. In: Defect and fault tolerance in VLSI and nanotechnology systems (DFT). Amsterdam, Niederlanden. IEEE, S 246–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco RC, Oncina J (1999) Learning deterministic regular grammars from stochastic samples in polynomial time. RAIRO (Theor Inform Appl) 33:1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2009) Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 41(3):1–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2012) Anomaly detection for discrete sequences: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 24:823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WC, Tseng SS, Wanf CY (2005) A novel manufacturing defect detection method using association rule mining techniques. Expert Syst Appl 29(4): 807–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.004. – doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.004. – ISSN 0957–4174

  • de Kleer J, Janssen B, Bobrow DG, Saha TKB, Moore NR, Sutharshana S (2013) Fault augmented modelica models. The 24th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, S 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Ester M. Sander J (2000) Knowledge discovery in databases: Techniken und Anwendungen, Bd 1. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. – ISBN 3540673288

    Google Scholar 

  • Faltinski S, Flatt H, Pethig F, Kroll B, Vodenčarević A, Maier A, Niggemann O (2012) Detecting anomalous energy consumptions in distributed manufacturing systems. In: IEEE 10th International conference on industrial informatics INDIN, Beijing, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R (Hrsg) (1996) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. AAAI/MITPress, Menlo Park, CA, USA– ISBN0–262– 56097–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Filev DP, Chinnam RB, Tseng F, Baruah P (2010) An industrial strength novelty detection framework for autonomous equipment monitoring and diagnostics. IndustrialInformatics, IEEE Trans 6(4):767–779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2010.2060732. – doi:10.1109/TII.2010.2060732. – ISSN 1551–3203

  • Fraunhofer Institut für intelligente Analyse- und Informationssysteme IAIS (2013) BIG DATA – Vorsprung durch Wissen Innovationspotenzialanalyse. – Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey CW (2008) Diagnosis and monitoring of complex industrial processes based on self-organizing maps and watershed transformations. In: Computational intelligence for measurement systems and applications, 2008. CIMSA 2008. 2008 I.E. international conference on, S 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • General Electric Intelligent Platforms (2012) The Rise Of Big Data – Leveraging large time-series data sets to drive innovation, competitiveness and growth – capitalizing on the big data oppurtunity. – Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilani S, Windmann S, Pethig F, Kroll B, Niggemann O (2013) The importance of model-learning for the analysis of the energy consumption of production plant. In: 18th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). Cagliari, Italien

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröger C, Niedermann F, Mitschang B (2012) Data mining-driven manufacturing process optimization. In: Ao, SI, Gelman L, Hukins DWL, Hunter A, Korsuns- Ky AM (Hrsg) Proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2012 Bd III, WCE 2012, 4–6 July, 2012, London, Newswood, July 2012. – ISBN 978–988–19252–2–0, 1475–1481

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou ZS, Wang Z (2013) From model- based control to data-driven control: survey, classification and perspective. Inform Sci 235:3–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Isermann R (2004) Model-based fault detection and diagnosis – status and applications. In: 16th IFAC Symposium on automatic control in aerospace. St. Petersbug, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs A (2009) The pathologies of big data. Commun ACM 52(8):36–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1536616.1536632. doi: 10.1145/1536616.1536632. ISSN 0001–0782

  • Janusz M, Venkatasubramanian M (1991) Automatic generation of qualitative descriptions of process trends for fault detection and diagnosis. Engineering Applications of Artifical Intelligence 4(5):329–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasperneite J, Niggemann O (2012) Intelligente Assistenzsysteme zur Beherrschung der Systemkomplexität in der Automation. In: ATP edition – Automatisierungstechnische Praxis 9/2012, Oldenburg Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin J (2005) Fault tolerant control systems – an introductory overview. Acta Automat Sin 31(1):161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh E, Kasetty S (2003) On the need for time series data mining benchmarks: a survey and empirical demonstration. Data Min Knowl Disc 7(4):349–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Klar D, Huhn M, Gruhser J (2011) Symptom propagation and transformation analysis: a pragmatic model for system-level diagnosis of large automation systems. Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA), 2011 I.E. 16th conference on. Toulouse, Frankreich, S 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll B, Schaffranek D, Schriegel S, Niggemann O (2014) System modeling based on machine learning for anomaly detection and predictive maintenance in industrial plants. In 19th IEEE International conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). Barcelona, Spanien

    Google Scholar 

  • Krstajic M, Keim DA (2013) Visualization of streaming data: observing change and context in information visualization techniques. In: International conference on big data. Santa Clara, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier A, Vodenčarević A, Niggemann O, Just R, Jäger M (2011) Anomaly detection in production plants using timed automata. In: 8th International conference on informatics in control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), Noordwijkerhout, S 363–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier A, Tack T, Niggemann O (2012) Visual anomaly detection in production plants. In: 9th International conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics (ICINCO), Rome, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, Chui (2011) Brown: big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity/McKinsey Company, McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. – Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Markou M, Singh S (2003) Novelty detection: a review – Part 1. Department of Computer Science, PANN Research, University of Exeter, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurya MR, Rengaswamy R, Venkatasubramanian V (2007) Fault diagnosis using dynamic trend analysis: a review and recent developments. Eng Appl Artif Intel 20:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei L, Thole CA (2008) Data analysis for parallel car-crash simulation results and model optimization. In: Simul Modell Pract Theory 16(3):329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Niggemann O, Stein B, Vodenčarević A, Maier A, Kleine Büning H (2012) Learning behavior models for hybrid timed systems. In: Twenty-sixth conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-12). Toronto, S 1083–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter MK, Erraguntla M, Hogg GL, Beachkofski B (2006) Using simulation, data mining, and knowledge discovery techniques for optomized aircraft engine fleet management. In: Nicol D, Fujimoto R, Lawson, B, Liu J, Perrone F, Wie- Land F (Hrsg) Proceedings of the thirty-eighth winter simulation conference. Monterey, California: IEEE Press, S 1253–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang CK, Le CV (2013) Optimization of total energy consumption in flexible manufacturing systems using weighted P-timed petri nets and dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 11:1083–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi VR, Thyagarajan T (2011) Application of hybrid modeling techniques to a non linear hybrid system. In: Process automation, control and computing (PACC), 2011 international conference on. Coimbatore, Indien, S 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanowski CJ, Nagi R (2002) Data mining for design and manufacturing. Version. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=566052.566065. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, 2002. – ISBN 1–4020–0034–0, Kapitel Analyzing maintenance data using data mining methods, S 235–254

  • Schenato L, Sinopoli B, Franceschetti M, Poolla K, Sastry S (2007) Foundations of control and estimation over lossy networks. Proc IEEE 95:163–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Lipson H (2009) Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier B (2001) Security monitoring: network security for the 21st century. Comput Secur 20:491–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva AA, Bazzi AM, Gupta S (2013) Fault diagnosis in electric drives using machine learning approaches. In: Electric machines & drives conference (IEMDC). Chicago, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Skormin V, Gorodetski I, Popyack L (2002) Data mining technology for failure prognostic of avionics. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 38(2):388–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2002.1008974. – doi 10.1109/TAES.2002.1008974. – ISSN 0018–9251

  • Tack T, Maier A, Niggemann O (2013) Visuelle Anomalie-Erkennung in Produktionsanlagen. In: VDI Kongress AUTOMATION. Baden Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Thollard F, Dupont P, Higuera C (2000) Probabilistic DFA inference using Kullback‐Leibler divergence and minimality. In: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann, S 975–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Trépos R, MASSON V, Cordier M, Gascuelodoux C, Salmon-Monviola J (2012) Mining simulation data by rule induction to determine critical source areas of stream water pollution by herbicides. Comput Electron Agric 86(2012):75–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.01.006. – doi 10.1016/j.compag.2012.01.006. – ISSN 0168–1699

  • Verwer S (2010) Efficient identification of timed automata: Theory and practice. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwer S, Weerdt M, Witteveen C (2010) A likelihood-ratio test for identifying probabilistic deterministic real-time automata from positive data. In: Sempere J, García, P (Hrsg) Grammatical inference: theoretical results and applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodenčarević A, Kleine Büning H, Niggemann O, Maier A (2011a) Identifying behavior models for process plants. In: Proceeding of the 16th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation ETFA’2011. Toulouse, S 937–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodenčarević A, Kleine Büning H, Niggemann O, Maier A (2011b) Using behavior models for anomaly detection in hybrid systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on information, communication and automation technologies-ICAT 2011. Sarajevo, Bosnien und Herzegowina

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K (2007) Applying data mining to manufacturing: the nature and implications. J Intell Manuf 18(4):487–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0053-5. – doi 10.1007/s10845– 007–0053–5. – ISSN 0956–5515

  • Wang H, Chai T, Ding J, Brown M (2009) Data driven fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control: some advances and possible new directions. Acta Autom Sin 25(6):739–747

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M, Urbanski J (2013) „Big Data im Praxiseinsatz–Szenarien, Beispiele, Effekte.“

    Google Scholar 

  • White T (2009) Hadoop: the definitive guide. 1st. O’Reilly Media, 2009. – ISBN 0596521979, 9780596521974

    Google Scholar 

  • Windmann S, Jiao S, Niggemann O, Borcherding H (2013) A stochastic method for the detection of anomalous energy consumption in hybrid industrial systems. Indin 11:194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Sun S (2013) Real-time data driven monitoring and optimization method for IoT-based sensible production process. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC). Evry, Frankreich

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Jin X, Cao, Y und Wang J (2010) Data mining application on crash simulation data of occupant restraint system. In: Expert Syst Appl 37(8):5788–5794. – ISSN 0957–4174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer-Anwendungszentrum Industrial Automation, Lemgo, Deutschland

    Oliver Niggemann & Sören Volgmann

  2. Vanderbilt University und Institute for Software Integrated Systems, Nashville, TN, USA

    Gautam Biswas, John S. Kinnebrew & Hamed Khorasgani

  3. Institut für Industrielle Informationstechnik inIT, Lemgo, Deutschland

    Andreas Bunte

Authors
  1. Oliver Niggemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gautam Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John S. Kinnebrew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamed Khorasgani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sören Volgmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andreas Bunte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Niggemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Maschinenwesen, AIS, Technische Universität München Maschinenwesen, AIS, Garching, Germany

    Birgit Vogel-Heuser

  2. Universität Stuttgart, Germany

    Thomas Bauernhansl

  3. Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany

    Michael ten Hompel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niggemann, O., Biswas, G., Kinnebrew, J.S., Khorasgani, H., Volgmann, S., Bunte, A. (2017). Datenanalyse in der intelligenten Fabrik. In: Vogel-Heuser, B., Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M. (eds) Handbuch Industrie 4.0 Bd.2. Springer Reference Technik (). Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53248-5_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53248-5_73

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53247-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53248-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation