Skip to main content

Laparoskopische Nabel- und Narbenhernienreparation (IPOM)

  • Chapter
Minimalinvasive Viszeralchirurgie

Zusammenfassung

Die laparoskopische Versorgung von Nabel- und Narbenhernien nimmt einen besonderen Stellenwert ein. Es ist nicht nur der zeitgemäße Trend von Seiten der Ärzte und Patienten, Minimalinvasivität zu fördern und zu fordern, für viele Patienten bedeutet der laparoskopische Eingriff eine entscheidende Reduzierung der Morbidität des Eingriffes. In diesem Kapitel nimmt daher neben der Darstellung der Operationstechnik auch die Patientenaufklärung bedeutenden Raum ein. Die abschließende Zusammenfassung der aktuellen Evidenz bietet dem Chirurgen einen Überblick über die wesentlichen Aspekte der laparoskopischen IPOM (intraperitoneale Onlay-Mesh)-Versorgung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Awaiz A, Rahman F, Hossain MB, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon B, Memon MA (2015) Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia 19:449–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger D (2010) Laparoskopische IPOM-Technik. Chirurg 81:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U et al. (2014) Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS) Part 1. Surg Endosc 28: 2–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelala E, Baraké H, Estievenart J et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience. Hernia 20(1):101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Helgstrand F, Westen M, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Strandfelt P, Bisgaard T (2015) Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 102:541–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristaudi A, Matthey-Gié ML, Demartines N, Christoforidis D (2014) Prospective assessment of trocar-specific morbidity in laparoscopy. World J Surg 38:3089–3096

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccurullo D, Baccari P, Agresta F, Vettoretto N, Piccoli M (2015) Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected]. Surg Endosc 29:2463–2484

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS et al (2007) An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60: 383–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz UA, Spor L, Germer CT (2011) Therapie der Netz(-Implantat)-Infektion. Chirurg 82:208–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz UA, Wiegering A, Germer CT (2014a) Eingriffsspezifische Komplikationen der Hernienchrirugie. Chirurg 85:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz UA, Winkler MS, Härtel RW et al (2014b) Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification. Hernia 18:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz UA, Wiegering A, Germer CT (2015) Indikationen zur laparoskopischen Versorgung großer Narbenhernien. Chirurg 86: 338–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz UA, Muysoms FE, Germer CT, Wiegering A (2016) Technische Prinzipien der Narbenhernienchirurgie. Chirurg 87:355–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin G, Turquier F (2013) Impact of the defect size, the mesh overlap and the fixation depth on ventral hernia repairs: a combined experimental and numerical approach. Hernia 17:647–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgstrand F (2016) National results after ventral hernia repair. Dan Med J 63. pii: B5258

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T (2013) Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216:217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokotovic D, Sjølander H, Gögenur I, Helgstrand F (2016a) Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe. Hernia 20:281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2016b) Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair. JAMA 316:1575–1582

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokotovic D, Gögenur I, Helgstrand F (2016c) Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement. Hernia doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y [Epub ahead of print]

  • Langbach O, Bukholm I, Benth JŠ, Røkke O (2016) Long-term quality of life and functionality after ventral hernia mesh repair. Surg Endosc 30:5023–5033

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauscher JC, Leonhardt M, Martus P, Zur Hausen G, Aschenbrenner K, Zurbuchen U, Thielemann H, Kohlert T, Schirren R, Simon T, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP, Kreis ME (2016) Beobachtung vs. Operation oligosymptomatischer Narbenhernien. Aktueller Stand der AWARE-Studie. Chirurg 87:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc KA (2004) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: complications-how to avoid and handle. Hernia 8:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc K (2016) Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 20:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercoli H, Tzedakis S, D’Urso A, Nedelcu M, Memeo R, Meyer N, Vix M, Perretta S, Mutter D (2016) Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2 [Epub ahead of print]

  • Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG et al (2012a) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16: 239–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Muysoms FE, Novik B, Kyle-Leinhase I et al (2012b) Mesh fixation alternatives in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 22:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Muysoms F, Vander Mijnsbrugge G et al (2013) Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with «double crown” versus «sutures and tackers” in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 17:603–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel PP, Love MW, Ewing JA, Warren JA, Cobb WS, Carbonell AM (2016) Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z. [Epub ahead of print]

  • von Rahden BH, Spor L, Germer CT et al (2012) Three-component intraperitoneal mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of anterior parasternal costodiaphragmatic hernias. J Am Coll Surg 214:e1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Ezra E, Österberg J, Montgomery A (2016) Quality of Life and Surgical Outcome 1 Year After Open and Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: PROLOVE: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 263:244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmaeckers EJ, Wassenaar EB, Raymakers JT et al (2010) Bulging of the mesh after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias. JSLS 14:541–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Silecchia G, Campanile FC, Sanchez L, Ceccarelli G, Antinori A, Ansaloni L, Olmi S, Ferrari GC,

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K (2016) Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature. Surg Today 46:764–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJ, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2016) Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg 103:1598–1607

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J et al (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegering A, Sinha B, Spor L et al (2014) Gentamicin for prevention of intraoperative mesh contamination: demonstration of high bactericide effect (in vitro) and low systemic bioavailability (in vivo). Hernia 18: 691–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler MS, Gerharz E, Dietz UA (2008) Overview and evolving strategies of ventral hernia repair. Urologe 47:740–747

    Google Scholar 

  • von Rahden BH, Spor L, Germer CT et al. (2012) Three-component intraperitoneal mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of anterior parasternal costodiaphragmatic hernias. J Am Coll Surg 214:e1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichen MS, Lujan HJ, Mata WN et al (2013) Closure versus non-closure of hernia defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh. Hernia 17:589–596

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dietz, U., Germer, CT., Wiegering, A. (2017). Laparoskopische Nabel- und Narbenhernienreparation (IPOM). In: Keck, T., Germer, C. (eds) Minimalinvasive Viszeralchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53204-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53204-1_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53203-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53204-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics