Skip to main content

Laparoskopische Sleeve-Gastrektomie

  • Chapter
Minimalinvasive Viszeralchirurgie
  • 2704 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die laparoskopische Sleeve-Gastrektomie ist die bariatrische Operation mit der aktuell am schnellsten ansteigenden Fallzahl weltweit. Die relativ kurze Operationszeit, ein vermeintlich technisch einfacher operativer Eingriff sowie die beeindruckenden Effekte im postoperativen Verlauf sind die treibende Kraft in der raschen Weiterentwicklung dieser Operationsmethode. Gerade in der Beliebtheit der operativen Methode liegt die Gefahr, die potentiellen frühen und späten postoperativen Komplikationen zu unterschätzen. Das Kapitel soll helfen, das tiefere Verständnis für die Methode und einen funktionierenden operativen Standard für das eigene Zentrum zu entwickeln.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Almongy G, Crookes PF, Anthone G (2004) Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg 14:492–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, Ballet T, Vilallonga R, Leman G (2016) Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(10):1778–1786

    Google Scholar 

  • Cal P, Deluca L, Jakob T, Fernández E (2016) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 27 versus 39 Fr bougie calibration: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 30(5):1812–1815

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Adipositas Gesellschaft (2014) Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie zur »Prävention und Therapie der Adipositas«, Version 2.0, AWMF-Register 050/001; http://www.adipositas-gesellschaft.de/fileadmin/PDF/Leitlinien/050-001l_S3_Adipositas_Praevention_Therapie_2014-11.pdf

  • Hawasli A, Jacquish B, Almahmeed T, Vavra J, Roberts N, Meguid A, Szpunar S (2015) Early effects of bougie size on sleeve gastrectomy outcome. Am J Surg 209(3):473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess DS, Hess DW (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg 8:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Iossa A, Abdelgawad M, Watkins BM, Silecchia G (2016) Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(6):757–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston D, Dachter J, Sue-Ling H, King R, Martin L (2003) The Magenstrasse and Mill operation fpr morbid obesity. Obes Surg 13: 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcz WK, Karcz-Socha I, Marjanovic G, Kuesters S, Goos M, Hopt UT, Szewczyk T, Baumann T, Grueneberger JM (2014) To band or not to band--early results of banded sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 24(4):660–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindel TL, Oleynikov D (2016) The Improvement of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Barrett’s after Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 26(4):718–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Kim A, Sanossian C, Francois F (2016) Impact of obesity treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 28;22(4):1627–1638

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA (1993) Biliopanreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg 3:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanovic G, Hopt UT (2011) Physiology of anastomotic healing. Chirurg 82(1):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Mion F, Tolone S, Garros A, Savarino E, Pelascini E, Robert M, Poncet G, Valette PJ, Marjoux S, Docimo L, Roman S (2016) High-resolution Impedance Manometry after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Increased Intragastric Pressure and Reflux are Frequent Events. Obes Surg 26(10):2449–2456

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, Saunders JK, Ude-Welcome A, Gagner M (2013) Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg 257(2):231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen B, Peters T, Devaux N, Kern B, Christoffel-Courtin C, Drewe J, von Flüe M, Beglinger C (2009) Improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 250(2):234–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan JP, Inabet WB, Gagner M, Pomp A (2003) Early experience with two stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg 13:861–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubino F (2016) Medical research: Time to think differently about diabetes. Nature 24;533(7604):459–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, Schauer PR, Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ, Del Prato S, Ji L, Sadikot SM, Herman WH, Amiel SA, Kaplan LM, Taroncher-Oldenburg G, Cummings DE; Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit (2016) Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Diabetes Care 39(6):861–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD, Aminian A, Pothier CE, Kim ES, Nissen SE, Kashyap SR; STAMPEDE Investigators (2014) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 22;370(21):2002–2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, Rizzello M, Casella G, Leonetti F, Basso N (2006) Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopanreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg 16:1138–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MC, Guo XH, Zhang YW, Zhang YL, Zhang HH, Zhang YC (2015) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for obese patients with Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Surg 81(2):166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Dai X, Xie H, Feng J, Li Z, Lu Q (2016) The efficacy of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 25:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, Jacobi C, Makarewicz W, Weigand G (2007) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg 17(10):1297–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner R, El-Sayes I, Manger T, Weiner S, Lippert H, Stroh C; Obesity Surgery Working Group, Competence Network Obesity (2014) Antidiabetic efficacy of obesity surgery in Germany: a quality assurance nationwide survey. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(2):322–327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marjanovic, G. (2017). Laparoskopische Sleeve-Gastrektomie. In: Keck, T., Germer, C. (eds) Minimalinvasive Viszeralchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53204-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53204-1_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53203-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53204-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics