Abstract
The laparoscopic approach for pyloromyotomy is gaining in popularity, mainly as a result of its cosmetic advantage, ease of operation, and good outcome [1, 2]. It requires very basic, inexpensive instrumentation, which probably helps make it cost-effective compared with open surgery [3]. Whatever the reasons for the increasing popularity of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, the approach may be embarked upon safely by those with suitable skills and resources, and is taught easily.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S, Reblock K, Gaines BA, Pastor A, et al. Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:390–8.
Sola JE, Neville HL. Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1631–7.
Carrington EV, Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Drake DP, Curry JI, Kiely EM, et al. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy. J Surg Res. 2012;178:315–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McHoney, M. (2017). Pyloric Stenosis. In: McHoney, M., Kiely, E., Mushtaq, I. (eds) Color Atlas of Pediatric Anatomy, Laparoscopy, and Thoracoscopy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53085-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53085-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53083-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53085-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)