Advertisement

The Recovery Obligation and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations: The Spanish Experience

  • Juan Salvador PastorizaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance book series (MPISTUD, volume 6)

Abstract

The obligation to recover illegal and incompatible State aid, even though it is a basic principle of the system for controlling State aid, is not absolute. For example, this obligation would be overridden in cases involving protection of the general principles of EU law, legitimate expectations or legal certainty. This chapter, after examining the EU’s practice in applying these principles, will look at two recent examples of State aid cases in Spain in relation to this issue, one of which concerned financial goodwill and the other, the Spanish tax lease. Finally, some observations will be made about the recent legislative developments in Spain with respect to the recovery of fiscal State aid.

Keywords

Advocate General Commission Decision Legal Certainty Legitimate Expectation Legal Uncertainty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barciela Pérez JA (2010) El principio de protección de la confianza legítima en el ámbito tributario: jurisprudencia del TJUE. Revista Quincena Fiscal 22:1–15Google Scholar
  2. Buendia Sierra JL (2015) State aid and tax rulings: an appropriate way to tackle aggressive tax planning? Tax Plan Int Eur Tax Serv 17(12):9–12Google Scholar
  3. Calvo Salinero R (2015) Sentencias del Tribunal General de la Unión Europea de 7 de noviembre de 2014 en los asuntos T-219/10 Autogrill c. Comisión y T-399/11 Santander y Santusa Holding c. Comisión. Anulación de las decisiones de la Comisión Europea que consideraban el artículo 12.5. TRLIS como ayuda de Estado. In: Práctica fiscal para abogados. Los casos más relevantes en 2014 de los grandes despachos. La LeyGoogle Scholar
  4. Council of the European Union (2015) Council Regulation (EU) No 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015, laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (L 248/1, 24.9.2015)Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (1998) Commission Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxations, OJEU C 384, of 10.12.1998Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (2002) Commission Decision of 8 May 2001 concerning State aid implemented by France in favour of the Bretagne Angleterre Irlande company. Brittany Ferries, OJEU L 12, of 15.1.2002Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2004) Commission Regulation (EC) 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC TreatyGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (2006) Commission Decision of 20 December 2006, in the aid scheme implemented by France under Article 39 CA of the General Tax Code – State aid C 46/2004 (ex NN 65/2004), OJEU of 30.4.2007 L 112Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2007a) Press Release IP/07/1469 of 10 October 2007 – State Aid: Commission opens formal investigation into Spain’s tax schemes for the acquisition of shares in foreign companiesGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2007b) Notice from the Commission towards an effective implementation of Commission decisions ordering Member States to recover unlawful and incompatible State aid (2007/C 272/05), OJ C 272, 15.11.2007Google Scholar
  11. European Commission (2009) Commission Notice on the enforcement of the State aid rules by the national courts of 9 April 2009, OJEU C 85, 09 April 2009Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2011) State aid – Spain – State aid SA.21233 (11/C) (ex NN/11, ex CP 137/06) – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements also known as the Spanish tax lease system – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJEU C 276 of 21.9.2011Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2012) Decision of 20.11.2012, State aid SA.34736 (2012/N) – Spain Early depreciation of assets acquired through a financial leasing, C (2012) 8252 finalGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2014a) Communication from the Commission. Draft Commission Notice on the notion of State aid pursuant to Article 107(1) TFEUGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2014b) Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty Text with EEA relevanceGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2014c) Commission Decision of 17 July 2013, on the aid scheme SA.21233 C/11 (ex NN/11, ex CP 137/06) implemented by Spain. Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements also known as the Spanish Tax Lease System, OJEU of 16.4.2014, L 114Google Scholar
  17. García Novoa C, López Gómez A (2014) Reflexiones sobre el Tax Lease. Paper presented in Jornada de la Asociación Española de Asesores Fiscales, Santiago de Compostela, 2014Google Scholar
  18. Moreno González S (2015) La recuperación de las ayudas de Estado de carácter tributario. Panorama actual y propuestas de futuro. Revista Quincena Fiscal (6):1–60Google Scholar
  19. Norwegian Minister Letter (2009) Letter from the Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry to the Commissioner Neelie Kroes of 13 Feb. 2009. http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/NHD/Vedlegg/Brev/kroes_090213.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2016
  20. Villar Ezcurra M (2014) State aid and tax lease regimes in the shipbuilding industry: lessons learned from a Spanish case. Eur Tax 54(10):439–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GarriguesMadridSpain
  2. 2.GarriguesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations