Tax Legislation and the Notion of Fiscal Aid: A Review of 5 Years of European Jurisprudence

  • Wolfgang SchönEmail author
Part of the MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance book series (MPISTUD, volume 6)


State aid discipline under Art. 107, 108 TFEU has established itself as a major constraint to the tax sovereignty of national legislators. By analyzing a great number of CJEU judgments delivered during the last 5 years, this article lays out both the conceptual and the political issues which arise when tax benefits are subject to control under European competition law. This affects the concepts of “advantage”, “selectivity” and “discrimination” as well as special cases like “negative state aid”, “indirect selectivity” or “de-facto selectivity”. The author proposes to apply Art. 107 par. 1 TFEU only if a tax provision deviates beneficially from a “normal” or “benchmark” treatment and rejects the trend to interpret Art. 107 par. 1 TFEU as a general ban on discrimination. Moreover, this article pleads for a limited reading of “selectivity” which is only given when a tax advantage confers a financial benefit on certain branches of the economy or certain individualized enterprises.


Advocate General France Telecom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Afonso M (2013) Recovery of fiscal aid. In: Micheau C, Rust A (eds) State aid and tax law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 57–68Google Scholar
  2. Azizi J (2013) Foreword. In: Micheau C, Rust A (eds) State aid and tax law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp xv–xviiGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon K (2013) European Union law of state aid, 2nd edn. Oxford University press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Baeten N, Gam L (2013) Tax measures and the private investor test: the Court of Justice endorses a level playing field. Eur State Aid Law Q 12(3):546–550Google Scholar
  5. Bartosch A (2010) Materielle Selektivität und Europäische Beihilfenkontrolle: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag zum derzeitigen Stand der Gemeinschaftsrechtsprechung. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 21:12–17Google Scholar
  6. Biondi A (2013) State aid is falling down, falling down: an analysis of the case law on the notion of aid. Common Mark Law Rev 50(6):1719–1743Google Scholar
  7. Cordewener A (2012) Asymmetrical tax burden and EU state aid control. EC Tax Rev 21(6):288–292Google Scholar
  8. Cornella S (2015) The market economy investor principle to evaluate state aid. Maastricht J 22:553–575Google Scholar
  9. De la Blétière R (2015) Les décisions individuelles à la lumière des aides d’Etat: coup de projecteur sur un risqué méconnu. Revue de Droit Fiscal 27:51–57Google Scholar
  10. De Weerth J (2012) Tax legislation within the scope of EU-state aid law: an overview of critical issues arising from the German reorganization clause. Intertax 40(6/7):414–420Google Scholar
  11. Debroux M (2012) State aid and tax measures: the lessons of the EdF case. Competition Law Insight 11(8):6–7Google Scholar
  12. Dubout E, Maitrot de la Motte A (2012) Normalité, séléctivité et légitimité des régimes fiscaux dans l’Union européenne: les paradis fiscaux au purgatoire des aides d’État. Revue de Droit Fiscal 5:55–62Google Scholar
  13. Engelen F (2012) State aid and restrictions on free movement: two sides of the same coin? Eur Tax 52(5):204–209Google Scholar
  14. Engelen F, Gunn A (2013) State aid: towards a theoretical assessment framework. In: Micheau C, Rust A (eds) State aid and tax law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 137–151Google Scholar
  15. Englisch J (2012) Steuerliche Sonderbelastung als verbotene Beihilfe – eine unionsrechtliche Achillesferse der Kernbrennstoffsteuer. Steuer und Wirtschaft 89(42):318–328Google Scholar
  16. Englisch J (2013) State aid and indirect taxation. In: Micheau C, Rust A (eds) State aid and tax law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 69–86Google Scholar
  17. European Commission (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU State Aid Modernisation, COM/2012/0209 finalGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission (2015) European Commission Press Release, Commission decides selective tax advantages for Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands are illegal under EU state aid rules, 21 October 2015, IP/15/5880Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (2016) Notice on the notion of State aid as referred to ini Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2016/C 262/01) OJ C 262, 19th July 2016, p 1–50Google Scholar
  20. Gunn A, Luts J (2015) Tax rulings, APAs and state aid: legal issues. EC Tax Rev 24(2):119–125Google Scholar
  21. Hackemann T, Sydow S (2013) Richtungsentscheidung des EuGH in der Rs. C-6/12 P Oy für die Voraussetzungen der Einstufung einer Sanierungsklausel als staatliche Beihilfe; Auswirkungen auf die suspendierte deutsche Sanierungsklausel des § 8c Abs.1a KStG. Internationales Steuerrecht Heft 20:757–800Google Scholar
  22. Heidenhain M (2010) Bemerkungen zum Tatbestand der Selektivität im europäischen Beihilfenrecht. In: Festschrift Maier-Reimer. Beck, München, pp 189–200Google Scholar
  23. Hey J (2015) EU-Beihilfen und Steuervergünstigungen - Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede. Steuer und Wirtschaft 4:331–334Google Scholar
  24. Honoré H (2009) Selectivity and taxation – reflections in the light of Case C-487/06 P, British Aggregates Association. Eur State Aid Law Q 8(4):527–537Google Scholar
  25. Ismer R, Karch A (2014) Das Referenzsystem bei der beihilferechtlichen Überprüfung nationaler Steuervergünstigungen. Internationales Steuerrecht 4:121–152Google Scholar
  26. Ismer R, Piotrowski S (2015) The selectivity of tax measures: a tale of two consistencies. Intertax 43(10):559–570Google Scholar
  27. Jaeger T (2012) Taking tax law seriously: the opinion of AG Mazák in EDF. Eur State Aid Law Q 11(1):1–3Google Scholar
  28. Kühling J (2013) Die beihilfenrechtliche Bewertung der Kernbrennstoffsteuer – Zeit für eine Ausdehnung der steuerlichen Kontrolle durch das Europarecht? Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht 24(4):113–123Google Scholar
  29. Lang M (2011) Das Gibraltar-Urteil des EuGH: Neue beihilferechtliche Vorgaben für das Steuerrecht? Österreichische Steuer-Zeitung volume (issue):593- last pageGoogle Scholar
  30. Lang M (2012) State aid and taxation: recent trends in the case law of the EC. Eur State Aid Law Q 11(2):411–421Google Scholar
  31. Lang M (2015) Tax rulings and state aid law. Br Tax Rev 3:391–395Google Scholar
  32. Leclercq L, du Pasquier J (2015a) Aides d’État à caractère fiscal: mieux comprendre pour mieux se defender: À propos des entreprises multinationals ayant bénéficié de rulings. Revue de Droit Fiscal (27):60–64Google Scholar
  33. Leclercq L, du Pasquier J (2015b) Incompatible State Aid: Should Enterprises Fear this Legislation. Tax Planning International European Tax Service volume (10):9–12Google Scholar
  34. López López H (2010) General thought on selectivity and consequences of a broad concept of state aid in tax matters. Eur State Aid Law Q 9(4):807–819Google Scholar
  35. Luja R (2012) (Re)shaping fiscal state aid: selected recent cases and their impact. Intertax 40(2):120–131Google Scholar
  36. Luja R (2015) Will the EU’s state aid regime survive BEPS? Br Tax Rev 3:379–389Google Scholar
  37. Lyal R (2015) Transfer pricing rules and state aid. Fordham Int Law J 38:1017–1043Google Scholar
  38. Martinez B (2015) Fiscal state aid: lights and shadows in the 2013 commission decision on the Spanish tax lease system. Eur Tax 55(2/3):69–77Google Scholar
  39. Metaxas A (2010) Selectivity of asymmetrical tax measures and distortion of competition in the telecoms sector. Eur State Aid Law Q 9(4):771–783Google Scholar
  40. Micheau C (2014) State aid, subsidy and tax incentives under EU and WTO Law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business/Kluwer Law International, Alphen Aan Den Rijn/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Micheau C (2015) Tax selectivity in European law of state aid: legal assessment and alternative approaches. Eur Law Rev 40:323–348Google Scholar
  42. Moscoso del Prado L, Arranz T (2013) A new step in material selectivity in tax measures. Eur State Aid Law Q 12(2):401–405Google Scholar
  43. Nicolaides P (2013) Taxes, the cost of capital and the private investor principle. Eur State Aid Law Q 12(2):243–245Google Scholar
  44. Nicolaides P (2015) State aid uncovered - critical analysis of developments in state aid 2014. Lexxion, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Nicolaides P, Metaxas A (2014) Asymmetric tax measures and EU state aid law. Eur State Aid Law Q 13(1):51–60fGoogle Scholar
  46. Nicolaides P, Rusu I (2012) The concept of selectivity: an ever wider scope. Eur State Aid Law Q 11(4):791–803Google Scholar
  47. Piernas López J (2015) The concept of state aid under EU law: from internal market to competition and beyond. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quigley C (2015) European state aid law and policy, 3rd edn. Hart Publishing, Oxford/PortlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Romariz C (2014) Revisiting material selectivity in EU state aid law – or “the ghost of yet-to-come”. Eur State Aid Law Q 13(1):39–50Google Scholar
  50. Rossi-Maccanico P (2012) Gibraltar: beyond the pillars of Hercules of selectivity. Eur State Aid Law Q 11(2):443–448Google Scholar
  51. Rossi-Maccanico P (2013) Fiscal aid review and tax competition. In: Micheau C, Rust A (eds) State aid and tax law. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 39–56Google Scholar
  52. Rossi-Maccanico P (2015) Fiscal state aids, tax base erosion and profit shifting. EC Tax Rev 24(2):63–77Google Scholar
  53. Schön W (2006) Special charges: a gap in European competition law. Eur State Aid Law Q 5(3):495–504Google Scholar
  54. Schön W (2012) State aid in the area of taxation. In: Hancher L, Ottervanger T, Slot PJ (eds) EU state aids, 4th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London, pp 321–362Google Scholar
  55. Soltesz U (2012) Die Rechtsprechung der Unionsgerichte zum Beihilferecht im Jahre 2012. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 22(4):134–140Google Scholar
  56. Temple Lang J (2012) The Gibraltar state aid and taxation judgment – A “methodological revolution”? Eur State Aid Law Q 11(4):805–812Google Scholar
  57. Temple Lang J (2015) Autogrill Espana and Banco Santander: the concept of “general” tax measures clarified for state aid. Eur Law Rev 40(5):763–768Google Scholar
  58. Tomat F (2012) The preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice on preferential taxation of cooperatives and state aid rules. Eur State Aid Law Q 11(2):462–476Google Scholar
  59. Truby J (2015) Aviation tax, free trade and state aid in the European Union: Ireland’s Riddled Air Travel Tax: Case T-473/12 Aer Lingus Ltd. v. Commission, and Case T-500/12 Ryanair Ltd. v. Commission. EC Tax Rev 24(4):232–235Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public FinanceMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations