Skip to main content

On Some Extensions of Syntactic Concept Lattices: Completeness and Finiteness Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Formal Grammar (FG 2015, FG 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9804))

Abstract

We provide some additional completeness results for the full Lambek calculus and syntactic concept lattices, where the underlying structure is extended to tuples of arbitrary finite and infinite size. Whereas this answers an open question for finite tuples, infinite tuples have not been considered yet. Nonetheless, they have a number of interesting properties which we establish in this paper, such as a particular class of languages which results in a finite lattice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Or words, respectively, depending on whether we think of our language as a set of words or a set of strings of words; we will choose the former option.

  2. 2.

    Whereas L and L1 are equally powerful in the sense of languages which are recognizable, [11] shows that \(\mathbf{FL }\) is considerably more powerful than L: whereas L only recognizes context-free languages by the classical result of [17], \(\mathbf{FL }\) can recognize any finite intersection of context-free languages. We only briefly mention this, because we have no space to make precise what it means for a calculus to recognize a class of languages.

References

  1. Buszkowski, W.: Completeness results for Lambek syntactic calculus. Math. Logic Q. 32(1–5), 13–28 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buszkowski, W.: Algebraic structures in categorial grammar. Theor. Comput. Sci. 1998(1–2), 5–24 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, A.: A learnable representation for syntax using residuated lattices. In: de Groote, P., Egg, M., Kallmeyer, L. (eds.) Formal Grammar. LNCS, vol. 5591, pp. 183–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, A.: Learning context free grammars with the syntactic concept lattice. In: Sempere, J.M., García, P. (eds.) ICGI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6339, pp. 38–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, A.: Logical grammars, logical theories. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, A.: The syntactic concept lattice: another algebraic theory of the context-free languages? J. Logic Comput. 25(5), 1203–1229 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Farulewski, M.: On finite models of the Lambek calculus. Studia Logica 80(1), 63–74 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Galatos, N., Jipsen, P., Kowalski, T., Ono, H.: Residuated Lattices: An Algebraic Glimpse at Substructural Logics. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, Z.S.: Structural Linguistics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kanazawa, M.: The Lambek calculus enriched with additional connectives. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 1, 141–171 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanazawa, M., Michaelis, J., Salvati, S., Yoshinaka, R.: Well-nestedness properly subsumes strict derivational minimalism. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LNCS, vol. 6736, pp. 112–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambek, J.: The mathematics of sentence structure. Am. Math. Monthly 65, 154–169 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambek, J.: On the calculus of syntactic types. In: Jakobson, R. (ed.) Structure of Language and its Mathematica Vl Aspects, pp. 166–178. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1961)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrill, G., Valentín, O., Fadda, M.: The displacement calculus. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 20(1), 1–48 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Okada, M., Terui, K.: The finite model property for various fragments of intuitionistic linear logic. J. Symb. Log. 64(2), 790–802 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pentus, M.: Lambek grammars are context free. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Los Alamitos, California, pp. 429–433. IEEE Computer Society Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sestier, A.: Contributions à une théorie ensembliste des classifications linguistiques. In: Actes du Ier Congrès de l’AFCAL, Grenoble, pp. 293–305 (1960) (Contributions to a set-theoretical theory of classifications)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wurm, C.: Completeness of full Lambek calculus for syntactic concept lattices. In: Morrill, G., Nederhof, M.-J. (eds.) Formal Grammar 2012 and 2013. LNCS, vol. 8036, pp. 126–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Wurm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wurm, C. (2016). On Some Extensions of Syntactic Concept Lattices: Completeness and Finiteness Results. In: Foret, A., Morrill, G., Muskens, R., Osswald, R., Pogodalla, S. (eds) Formal Grammar. FG FG 2015 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9804. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53042-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53042-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53041-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53042-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics