Abstract
Solid fuels are hard coal, lignite, and firewood. Their common properties are low energy densities resulting in high cost of transportation which in turn limits competition in solid fuel markets. Thanks to reduced costs of coal extraction, productivity increases in maritime transport, and reduced public subsidies, a global market for hard coal has nevertheless developed.
Due to coal’s high carbon content, coal combustion is the major source of global CO2 emissions, amounting to about three tons of CO2 per ton of hard coal. In addition, coal mining is associated with emission of methane (so-called pit gas ), another important greenhouse gas. Thus the economics of coal markets cannot be discussed without referring to international efforts designed to reduce global emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. In an attempt to achieve this aim, the European Union created a market for CO2 emission allowances (EU Directive 2003/87/EC). Depending on the effectiveness of this system, CO2 emissions may become sufficiently costly to increase the price of coal relative to that of other fuels, triggering its substitution by less harmful alternatives.
The issues addressed in this chapter are:
-
What are the factors determining the development of the market for hard coal?
-
What determines its price on the world market?
-
Is the market for coal competitive?
-
Is there a trend towards vertical integration as in the oil industry?
-
What are the perspectives of solid biofuels and in particular wood as a substitute for coal?
-
What determines the price of emission rights?
-
How do these prices depend on the design of the market for emissions?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Whereas extensive safety measures are used to protect miners in developed countries, developing and emerging countries regularly report major accidents in pits.
- 2.
Global methane emissions are much smaller than CO2 emissions, and their rate of decay in the atmosphere is higher as well. But one mole of methane has an impact on the climate that is 56 times (over a time horizon of 20 years) or 21 times (100 years) greater than that of one mole of CO2.
- 3.
More sophisticated models also take the complex physical and chemical exchange between atmosphere, oceans, and land surfaces into account.
- 4.
Speculative trade may dominate markets for emission rights, depending on the expectations of market participants. If an increase in the price of certificates is expected, speculators go long (i.e. purchase rights in excess of marginal abatement cost) and vice versa. If their expectations turn out to be right, speculators make a profit, otherwise they suffer a loss.
References
Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. (2000). Decomposing the cost of Kyoto. A global CGE analysis of multilateral policy impacts. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung ZEW.
BP. (2014). BP statistical review of world energy. Retrieved from www.bp.com/statisticalreview/
Bretschger, L. (2015). Greening economy, graying society. Zurich: CER-ETH Press.
Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2006). State and trends of the carbon market 2006. Washington: The World Bank.
EEA. (2015). SOER 2015–The European environment—State and outlook 2015. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
EU Commission. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Brussels. Official Journal of the European Union, L 275, 32–46.
Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe. (2005). Basisdaten Bioenergie Deutschland (Basic data on bioenergy in Germany). Gülzow. Retrieved from www.nachwachsende-rohstoffe.de/
Filippini, M. (2011). Short- and long-run time-of-use price elasticities in Swiss residential electricity demand. Energy Policy, 39(10), 5811–5817.
IEA. (2016). World energy outlook special report 2016: Energy and air pollution. Paris: International Energy Agency/OECD.
IPCC. (1990). Climate change: A key global issue. Overview and conclusions. Geneva, Nairobi: World Meteorological Organization, United Nations Environment Programme.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Geneva, Nairobi: World Meteorological Organization, United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/
Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). Managing the global commons. The economics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nordhaus, W., & Boyer, J. (2000). Warming the world: Economics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Umweltbundesamt. (2005). Emissionsfaktoren und Kohlenstoffgehalte (Emission Factors and Carbon Contents). Berlin: Deutsche Emissionshandelsstelle. Retrieved from www.dehst.de/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zweifel, P., Praktiknjo, A., Erdmann, G. (2017). Markets for Solid Fuels and CO2 Emissions. In: Energy Economics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53022-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53022-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53020-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53022-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)