Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soll/Ist-Vergleich

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Web-basierte Anwendungen Virtueller Techniken

  • 6345 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Ziel des Anwendungsszenarios ist eine präzise Digitalisierung und die Erforschung effizienter Verfahren zur Integration dieser Umgebungsdaten in Mixed Reality Anwendungen. Einsatzgebiete für die Erfassung großer Messvolumina liegen im Bereich der Fabrik-, Produktions- und Montageplanung, bei denen ein realistisches digitales Abbild der vorhandenen Arbeitsumgebung eine wichtige zusätzliche Informationsquelle darstellt. Für kleine Messvolumina liegen die Einsatzbereiche in der Produktabsicherung entlang des gesamten Produktlebenszyklus. Das Anwendungsszenario „Soll/Ist-Vergleich“ zeigt das Potential der Referenzarchitektur, weil hier zahlreiche existierende Technologien und ARVIDA-Entwicklungsergebnisse unterschiedlicher Partner über die Referenzarchitektur integriert wurden. Das Teilprojekt betrachtet zum einen die Umfelderkennung und Umfelderfassung in kleinen und großen Messvolumina, zum anderen wurden projektionsbasierte AR-Lösungen realisiert, durch die Verfahren für den Soll/Ist-Abgleich realisiert werden konnten.

Abstract

The goal of these application scenarios is a precise digitalisation and the research of efficient methods for the integration of environment data in mixed reality applications. Application areas for the registration of large measurement volumes can be found in the domains of factory, production and assembly planning, where a realistic digital image of the existent working environment plays an additional important role. For small volumes there are many applications in the field of product validation along the product life cycle. The scenarios described in this „target-performance comparison“ show very well the potential of the reference architecture because here the developed technologies are combined in many ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Laserscanlinie auf einer gewissen Höhe.

  2. 2.

    Im CAD-Modell definierte digitale Punkte werden am korrespondierenden realen Bauteil vermessen.

  3. 3.

    Web Services bezeichnet Software, die die Interaktion zwischen zwei Systemen über ein Netzwerk ermöglicht.

Literatur

  1. Scheer F, Specht R, Hildebrand A, Geißel O, Hein S (2008) VR/AR in der prototypischen Prozessoptimierung für die thermische Absicherung von Fahrzeugen. Proceedings of the 7th Paderborner Workshop Augmented & Virtual Reality in der Produktentstehung 2008

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scheer F, Müller S (2012) Indoor tracking for large area industrial mixed reality. Proceedings of the Joint Virtual Reality Conference (JVRC) of the 18th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments (EGVE), 9th EuroVR Conference, and the 22nd International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scheer F, Marschner M (2010) Approximating distance fields in image space. Proceedings of the Joint Virtual Reality Conference (JVRC) of the 7th Euro VR (Intuition) Conference, 16th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments (EGVE) and the Virtual Efficiency Congress (VEC)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scheer F, Keutel M (2010) Screen space ambient occlusion for virtual and mixed reality factory planning. J WSCG 18:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kasik D, Brüderlin B, Heyer M, Pfützner S (2007) Visibility-guided rendering to accelerate 3d graphics hardware performance. In: SIGGRAPH ’07: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 courses. ACM, New York, S 7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nießner M, Zollhöfer M, Izadi S, Stamminger M (2013) Real-time 3d reconstruction at scale using Voxel Hashing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32(6):169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newcombe RA, Izadi S, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Kim D, Davison AJ, Kohli P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Fitzgibbon A (2011) KinectFusion: real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: Proceedings of 10th IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, S 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wientapper F, Wuest H, Rojtberg P, Fellner DW (2013) A camera-based calibration for automotive augmented reality head-up-displays, In: IEEE Computer Society Visualization and Graphics Technical Committee (VGTC): 12th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2013: ISMAR 2013. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, S 189–197

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jung Y, Drevensek T, Behr J, Wagner S (2012) Declarative 3D approaches for distributed web-based scientific visualization services; Dec3D: Declarative 3D for the Web Architecture. http://ceurws.org/Vol-869/. Zugegriffen: 23. März 2017

  10. Cui Y, Schuon S, Thrun S, Stricker S, Theobalt C (2013) Algorithms for 3D shape scanning with a depth camera. IEEE T Pattern Anal (PAMI)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newcombe R, Izadi S, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Kim D, Davison AJ, Kohi P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Fitzgibbon A (2011) Kinectfusion: real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Basel, 10. Aufl., S 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steinbrücker F, Kerl C, Cremers D (2013) Large-scale multi-resolution surface reconstruction from RGB-D sequences. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Sydney, S 3264–3271

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai RY, Lenz RK (1989) A new technique for fully autonomous and efficient 3D robotics hand/eye calibration. In: IEEE T Robotic Autom ICRA, 5. Aufl., S 345–358

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wasenmüller O, Meyer M, Stricker D (2016) CoRBS: comprehensive RGB-D benchmark for slam using kinect v2. In: IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Lake Placid, S 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wasenmüller O, Meyer M, Stricker D (2016) Augmented reality 3D discrepancy check. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Merida, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wasenmüller O, Stricker D (2016) Comparison of kinect v1 and v2 depth images in terms of accuracy and precision. In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ACCV Workshop), Taipeh, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM E57 Committee on 3D Imaging Systems. http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/COMMITTEE/E57.htm. Zugegriffen: März 2017

  18. Garland M, Heckbert PS (1997) Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH ’97, New York, S 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lévy B, Petitjean S, Ray N, Maillot J (2002) Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH‘02, New York, S 362–371

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horn B (1987) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. JOSA A 4(4):629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pustka D (2004) Handling error in ubiquitous tracking setups. TU München Master Thesis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Daimler Protics GmbH, Ulm, Deutschland

    Oliver Adams & Axel Hildebrand

  2. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft/ IGD, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Ulrich Bockholt

  3. ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems GmbH, Kiel, Deutschland

    Leiv Jonescheit

  4. Sick AG, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Roland Krzikalla

  5. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft/ IGD, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Manuel Olbrich

  6. TU München, München, Deutschland

    Frieder Pankratz

  7. Siemens AG, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Matthias Roth

  8. Daimler Protics GmbH, Ulm, Deutschland

    Fabian Scheer

  9. EXTEND3D GmbH, München, Deutschland

    Björn Schwerdtfeger

  10. ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems GmbH, Kiel, Deutschland

    Ingo Staack

  11. 3DInteractive GmbH, Ilmenau, Deutschland

    Sebastian Pfützner

  12. DFKI GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland

    Oliver Wasenmüller

Authors
  1. Oliver Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulrich Bockholt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Axel Hildebrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leiv Jonescheit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roland Krzikalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Manuel Olbrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frieder Pankratz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sebastian Pfützner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Matthias Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fabian Scheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Björn Schwerdtfeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ingo Staack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Oliver Wasenmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Adams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg, Germany

    Werner Schreiber

  2. ART GmbH, Weilheim in OB, Germany

    Konrad Zürl

  3. Virtualtechnologies, Gifhorn, Germany

    Peter Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adams, O. et al. (2017). Soll/Ist-Vergleich . In: Schreiber, W., Zürl, K., Zimmermann, P. (eds) Web-basierte Anwendungen Virtueller Techniken. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52956-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52956-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52955-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52956-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation