MOOCs in Taiwan: The Movement and Experiences

  • Stephen J.H. YangEmail author
  • Jeff C.H. Huang
  • Anna Y.Q. Huang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


This chapter will address the reason that MOOCs brought our interests (MOE, The Ministry of Education, Taiwan), and the purpose and core mission of MOOCs in Taiwan, as well as MOOCs mean to the future of education in Taiwan. Taiwan’s MOOCs movement has been developed in two directions, one is led by MOE’s MOOCs project, government-funding projects; the other is inspired by volunteers who come from various universities, K12 schools, and private sectors. Taiwan has very strong research activities of digital learning, and now it is the right time that MOOCs project may benefit from the achievements of previous digital learning activities. Taiwan’s MOOCs movement should cover from K12 to higher education to lifelong learning, and to enterprise learning as well. MOOCs will reform or even revolutionize Taiwan’s education by enabling Taiwan’s Chinese courses on the world’s landscape, and improving pedagogical methods and structures. When MOOCs evolve, the way of learning evolve too. MOOCs are one of the choices students can have. Face-to-face and other online learning will evolve along with MOOCs. For the residential education, it will be changed because of MOOCs. We expect to see more and more blended learning occur especially from campus courses, and more and more collaborative learning, and flipped classrooms. In fact, this pedagogical theory has been practiced in Taiwan from K-12 to higher education. We see more and more progress and look forward to improvements in Taiwan’s education.


MOOCs Flipped classroom Collaborative learning Self-paced learning Self-regulated learning 


  1. Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computer and Education, 80, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bali, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
  3. Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D., DeBoer, J., Stump, G., Ho, A., & Seaton, D. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research and Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.Google Scholar
  5. Cabiria, J. (2012). Connectivist learning environments: Massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 2012 World Congress in Computer Science Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (pp. 16–19).Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computer and Education, 86, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diver, P., & Martinez, I. (2015). MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: Opportunities and challenges. Distance Education, 36(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., & Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, 18(5), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu, H. (2013). MOOC migration. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 30(4), 10–11.Google Scholar
  11. Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009–2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19–38.Google Scholar
  13. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227.Google Scholar
  14. Loya, A., Gopal, A., Shukla, I., Jermann, P., & Tormey, R. (2015). Conscientious behaviour, flexibility and learning in massive open on-line courses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas, H. C. (2013). Can the current model of higher education survive MOOCs and online learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 48(5), 54–56.Google Scholar
  16. Mascolo, M. F. (2009). Beyond student-centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as guided participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  17. Mehaffy, G. L. (2012). Challenge and change. NAFSA: Association of International Educators, 47(5), 1–12.Google Scholar
  18. Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Kloos, C. D. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Reilly, U. M., & Veeramachaneni, K. (2015). Technology for mining the big data of MOOCs. Research and Practice in Assessment, 9(2), 29–37.Google Scholar
  20. Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  21. Rhoads, R. A., Berdan, J., & Toven-Lindsey, B. (2013). The open courseware movement in higher education: Unmasking power and raising questions about the movement’s democratic potential. Educational Theory, 63(1), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shen, C.-W., & Kuo, C.-J. (2015). Learning in massive open online courses: Evidence from social media mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 568–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spoelstra, H., van Rosmalen, P., Houtmans, T., & Sloep, P. (2015). Team formation instruments to enhance learner interactions in open learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tayeb, B., & Akila, S. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 604–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, L., & Gruzd, A. (2014). MOOCs-international information and education phenomenon? Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 40(5), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young, E. (2015). Educational privacy in the online classroom: FERPA, MOOCs, and the big data conundrum. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 28(2), 549–592.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J.H. Yang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeff C.H. Huang
    • 2
  • Anna Y.Q. Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Central UniversityJhongLi CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringHwa Hsia University of TechnologyZhonghe District, New Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations