Educational Design for MOOCs: Design Considerations for Technology-Supported Learning at Large Scale

  • Stylianos Sergis
  • Demetrios G. SampsonEmail author
  • Lina Pelliccione
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent trend in the field of online learning. Their potential distinctive educational innovation is attributed mainly to their “Massiveness” and “Openness” dimensions. These two characteristics introduce new educational design considerations for accommodating the challenging demands of “Massiveness” and “Openness.” This is particularly pressing, since commonly recognized “shortcomings” of MOOCs, such as high participant drop-out rates and low levels of participant engagement and motivation, have been associated to the educational design of MOOCs. Within this context, this chapter discusses issues related with the educational design of MOOCs with emphasis to cultural and motivational issues, presents an analysis of existing educational design frameworks and/or guidelines for MOOCs and, finally, proposes an ADDIE-based educational design considerations framework (EDCF) for MOOCs, which incorporate the “Massiveness” and “Openness” requirements.


Massive open online courses xMOOC Educational design Design considerations Massiveness Openness ADDIE model 


  1. Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Cormier, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Proposal for a conceptual framework for educators to describe and design MOOCs. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  2. Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education. Retrieved from
  4. Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 687–698). Seoul: ACM.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 380–389.Google Scholar
  6. Balfour, S. P. (2013). Assessing writing in MOOCs: Automated essay scoring and calibrated peer review. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 40–48.Google Scholar
  7. Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3–49.Google Scholar
  8. Bentley, J., Tinney, M. V., & Chia, B. (2005). Intercultural internet-based learning: Know your audience and what they value. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blom, J., Verma, H., Li, N., Skevi, A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). MOOCs are more social than you believe. eLearning Papers, 33. Google Scholar
  10. Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. US: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, R. I., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheong, C., Cheong, F., & Filippou, J. (2013). Quick quiz: A Gamified approach for enhancing learning. In Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (p. 206).Google Scholar
  13. Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customer loyalty to online contents. CyberPsychology & behavior, 7(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, D. (2013). MOOCs: Taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Retrieved from
  15. Coffrin, C., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., & Kennedy, G. (2014). Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCS. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (pp. 83–92). Indianapolis: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39, 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 65–77.Google Scholar
  19. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. In Eighth IEEE International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (pp. 208–213). Compiegne: IEEE.Google Scholar
  21. Darr, C. W. (2012). Measuring student engagement: The development of a scale for formative use. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. de Freitas, S., & Griffiths, M. (2009). Massively multiplayer online role-play games for learning. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education (pp. 51–66). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  23. de Freitas, S., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeBoer, J., Ho, A. D., Stump, G. S., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “course” reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 763–772). Paris: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.Google Scholar
  27. Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(8), 328–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edmundson, A. (2007). The cultural adaptation process (CAP) model: Designing e-learning for another culture. In A. Edmundson (Ed.), Globalized e-learning cultural challenges (pp. 267–290). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: Analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (pp. 51–58). NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  33. Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley & P. J. Munoz-Merino (Eds.), Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities (pp. 98–111). International Publishing: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Gené, O.B., Núñez, M.M., & Blanco, Á.F. (2014). Gamification in MOOC: challenges, opportunities and proposals for advancing MOOC model. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 215–220).Google Scholar
  35. Guàrdia, L., Maina, M., & Sangrà, A. (2013). MOOC design principles. A pedagogical approach from the learner’s perspective. Journal eLearning Papers, 33. Google Scholar
  36. Grünewald, F., Meinel, C., Totschnig, M., & Willems, C. (2013). Designing ΜΟΟCs for the support of multiple learning styles. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma & A. Harrer (Eds). Scaling up learning for sustained impact (pp. 371–382). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics and Behavior, 15(3), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hew, K. F. (2015). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology (ahead-of-print).Google Scholar
  39. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Higbee, J. L., Schultz, J. L., & Goff, E. (2010). Pedagogy of inclusion: Integrated multicultural instructional design. Journal of college Reading and Learning, 41(1), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ho, A. D., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C., Whitehill, J., Northcutt, C., & Williams, J. J., et al. (2015). HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses. Retrieved from
  42. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hsu, S. H., Wen, M. H., & Wu, M. C. (2009). Exploring user experiences as predictors of MMORPG addiction. Computers & Education, 53(3), 990–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hung, K. H., Kinzer, C., & Chen, C. L. A. (2009). Motivational factors in educational MMORPGs: Some implications for education. In Z. Pan, A. D. Cheok, W. Müller, & M. Chang (Eds.), Transactions on Edutainment III (pp. 93–104). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  46. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Kauffman, Y., & Kauffman, D. (2015). MOOCs design and development: Using active learning pedagogy and instructional design model in MITx courses on the edX platform. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 22–27). AACE: Quebec.Google Scholar
  48. Kay, J., Reimann, P., Diebold, E., & Kummerfeld, B. (2013). MOOCs: So many learners, so much potential. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 3, 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170–179). Leuven: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the e-learning and digital cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kong, J. S. L., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2009). MMOG game-based collaborative learning: An exploratory study and its research potential. In Proceedings of Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS).Google Scholar
  52. Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 1–38.Google Scholar
  53. Koutropoulos, A., & Zaharias, P. (2015). Down the rabbit hole: An initial typology of issues around the development of MOOCs. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 2(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
  54. Klobas, J. E. (2014). Measuring the success of scaleable open online courses. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(3), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lackner, E., Kopp, M., Ebner, M. (2014). How to MOOC?—A pedagogical guideline for practitioners. In Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference “eLearning and Software for Education”. Bucharest.Google Scholar
  56. Lin, Y. L., & Lin, H. W. (2011). A study on the goal value for massively multiplayer online role-playing games players. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2153–2160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lisk, T. C., Kaplancali, U. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2012). Leadership in multiplayer online gaming environments. Simulation & Gaming, 43(1), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Literat, I. (2015). Implications of massive open online courses for higher education: Mitigating or reifying educational inequities?. Higher Education Research & Development, (ahead-of-print), 1–14.Google Scholar
  59. Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-H., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177–188.Google Scholar
  60. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013a). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227.Google Scholar
  61. Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S., & Adams, A. (2013b). The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers, 33.Google Scholar
  62. Luo, H., Robinson, A. C., & Park, J. Y. (2014). Peer grading in a MOOC: Reliability, validity, and perceived effects. Online Learning, 18(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  63. Macleod, H., Haywood, J., Woodgate, A., & Alkhatnai, M. (2015). Emerging patterns in MOOCs: Learners, course designs and directions. TechTrends, 59(1), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Maitland, C. F., & Bauer, J. M. (2001). National level culture and global diffusion: The case of the internet. In C. Ess & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Culture, technology, communication: Towards an intercultural global village (pp. 87–120). NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  65. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marrone, M., Mantai, L. & Luzia, K. (2013). MOOCs—What’s cultural inclusion got to do with it?. In H. Carter, M. Gosper & J. Hedberg (Eds.), Proceedings ascilite 2013 (pp. 541–545). Sydney: Ascilite.Google Scholar
  67. Mercado, S., Parboteeah, K. P., & Zhao, Y. (2004). On-line course design and delivery: Cross-national considerations. Strategic Change, 13(4), 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Valiente, J. A. R., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Inferring higher level learning information from low level data for the Khan Academy platform. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 112–116).Google Scholar
  69. Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014). Cultural translation in massive open online courses (MOOCs). eLearning Papers, 37.Google Scholar
  70. OECD (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The Emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved from
  71. Parrish, P., & Linder-Van Berschot, J. A. (2010). Cultural dimensions of learning: Addressing the challenges of multicultural instruction. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  72. Peterson, M. (2010). Massively multiplayer online role-playing games as arenas for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pundak, D., Sabag, N., & Trotskovsky, E. (2014). Accreditation of MOOCs. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(2), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Purser, E., Towndrow, A., & Aranguiz, A. (2013). Realising the potential of peer-to-peer learning: Taming a MOOC with social media. eLearning Papers, 33. Google Scholar
  75. Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Read, T., & Rodrigo, C. (2014). Toward a quality model for UNED MOOCs. eLearning Papers, 37.Google Scholar
  77. Reeder, K., Macfadyen, L. P., Chase, M., & Roche, J. (2004). Falling through the (cultural) gaps? Intercultural communication challenges in cyberspace. In F. Sudweeks & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication (CATaC) (pp. 123–134). Karlstad.Google Scholar
  78. Richter, T. (2011). Adaptability as a special demand on open educational resources: The cultural context of e-learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2.Google Scholar
  79. Rodriguez, O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1–13.Google Scholar
  80. Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis, 5(1), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rosewell, J., & Jansen, D. (2014). The OpenupEd quality label: Benchmarks for MOOCs. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 88–100.Google Scholar
  83. Rubens, W., Kalz, M., & Koper, R. (2014). Improving the learning design of massive open online courses. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4), 71–80.Google Scholar
  84. Powell, G. (1997). On being a culturally sensitive instructional designer and educator. Educational Technology, 37(2), 6–14.Google Scholar
  85. Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education. In R. McGreal, W. Kinuthia, S. Marshall & T. McNamara (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice (p. 5–15), Athabasca University.Google Scholar
  86. Spoelstra, H., Van Rosmalen, P., & Sloep, P. B. (2014). Toward project-based learning and team formation in open learning environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
  87. Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness + openness = new literacies of participation. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228–238.Google Scholar
  88. Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3).Google Scholar
  89. Suh, S., Kim, S. W., & Kim, N. J. (2010). Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary English education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26(5), 370–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Suznjevic, M., & Matijasevic, M. (2010). Why MMORPG players do what they do: Relating motivations to action categories. International Journal of Advanced Media and Communication, 4(4), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tan, C. T. (2013). MOOCs vs MMOGs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Managing the Asian Century (pp. 89–99). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tapanes, M. A., Smith, G. G., & White, J. A. (2009). Cultural diversity in online learning: A study of the perceived effects of dissonance in levels of individualism/collectivism and tolerance of ambiguity. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 472–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Thomas, M., Mitchell, M., & Joseph, R. (2002). A cultural embrace. TechTrends, 46(2), 40–45.Google Scholar
  95. Tuomi, I. (2006). Open Educational Resources: What they are and why do they matter. Retrieved from
  96. Tuomi, I. (2013). Open educational resources and the transformation of education. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rosé, C.P. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop. NevadaGoogle Scholar
  98. Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Young, P. A. (2008). The culture based model: Constructing a model of culture. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 107–118.Google Scholar
  100. Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014a). MOOCs—A review of the state-of-the-art. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Education Conference (pp. 9–20). Barcelona: ACM.Google Scholar
  101. Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2014b). What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference On Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 44–48). Athens: IEEE.Google Scholar
  102. Yuan, L. & Powell, S., (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. Retrieved from
  103. Van Hentenryck, P., & Coffrin, C. (2014). Teaching creative problem solving in a MOOC. Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 677–682). NY: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking, and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Voulgari, I., Komis, V., & Sampson, D.G. (2014). Player Motivations in Massively Multiplayer Online Games. In (ICALT). In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 238–239), Athens: IEEE.Google Scholar
  106. Voulgari, I., & Sampson, D.G. (2014). Massive open online courses (MOOCS) and massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs): Synergies and lessons to be learned. In D .G. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, J. M. Spector, & Isaias, P. (Eds.) Digital Systems for Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning (pp. 41–56). Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  107. Williams, D., Yee, N., & Caplan, S. E. (2008). Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(4), 993–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wu, M. L., Richards, K., & Saw, G. K. (2014). Examining a massive multiplayer online role-playing game as a digital game-based learning platform. Computers in the Schools, 31(1–2), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors, and perceptions in MOOCs. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 1882–1895). Vancouver: ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stylianos Sergis
    • 1
    • 3
  • Demetrios G. Sampson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lina Pelliccione
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology—HellasThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.School of EducationCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Digital SystemsUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations