Using Linked Data to Blended Educational Materials With OER—A General Context of Synergy: Linked Data for Describe, Discovery and Retrieve OER and Human Beings Knowledge to Provide Context

  • Nelson PiedraEmail author
  • Janneth Chicaiza
  • Javiera Atenas
  • Jorge Lopez-Vargas
  • Edmundo Tovar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


The OER movement has challenged the traditional value chain by employing new methods to deliver high-quality educational content. Open Educational Resources (OER) provide a strategic opportunity to improve the quality of education as well as to facilitate knowledge sharing, and capacity building. OER not only play a crucial role in nonformal and informal learning but they are actual resources/tools that can help enrich any classroom environment and push student thinking and comprehension. One of the fundamental concepts of OER is “the ability to freely adapt and reuse existing pieces of knowledge”, and therefore be a way to create more economic and personalized learning. To facilitate combining, remixing, or adaptation of OER, a key condition is to improve the metadata interoperability between different collections of open material siloed, i.e., the OER data should be readable for both people and humans. The Linked Data design issues and semantic technologies enable the creation and reuse of data models, concepts, and properties that are then connected, consulted, and combined on the Web, as if they were simply part of a global database. This work shows the evolution of Open Educational Movement and the potential of use of linked data approach to improve the discoverability, reusability, and integration of these materials available in the Web and support the inclusion of OER in courses, from a general context of synergy: Linked Data for describe, discovery, and retrieve OER and Human Beings power to provide context. The authors focus on a type of openness: open of contents as regards alteration, i.e., freedom to reuse the educational material, to combine it with other academic materials, to adapt, and to share it further under an open license.


Open learning Linked data Linked OER data Open educational resources Reusability Semantic Web Interoperability Reuse Blended learning OER 



The work has been funded by the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), and partially by Regional Government of Madrid (eMadrid S2013/ICE-2715). The Scholarship partially funded by “Secretaría Nacional de Educación Superior, Ciencia y Tecnología e Innovación” of Ecuador (SENESCYT).


  1. Abeywardena, I. S. (2012). The re-use and adaptation of open educational: Resources (OER). An Exploration of Technologies Availables. Commonwealth of Learning.Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, M. (1998) World wide web—beyond the basics. Prentice Hall. Retrieved from
  3. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in US higher education, 2014. Pearson: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
  4. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from
  5. Berners-Lee, T. (1989) Information management: A proposal. Internal Project Proposal, CERN. Retrieved from
  6. Berners-Lee, T. (2006) Linked data: Design issues. W3C,
  7. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bizer, C., Cyganiak, R., & Heath, T. (2007). How to publish linked data on the web. Retrieved from
  9. Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cano, A., Varga, A., Rowe, M., Ciravegna, F., He, Y. (2013) Harnessing linked knowledge source for topic classification in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM Hypertext and Social Media Conference. Paris, France.Google Scholar
  11. Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 1–11.Google Scholar
  12. Chicaiza, J., Piedra, N., Lopez-Vargas, J.,& Tovar, E. (2014) Domain categorization of open educational resources based on linked data. International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web.Google Scholar
  13. Chicaiza, J., Piedra, N., Lopez-Vargas, J., & Tovar, E. (2015) Promotion of self-learning by means of open educational resources and semantic technologies. In Proceeding of 2015 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).Google Scholar
  14. COAR. (2015). COAR Roadmap. Future directions for repository interoperability. Comparison of TRAC Checklist and PLEDGE Policy List. Available at: 2015.
  15. CTOED. (2007). Cape town open education declaration: Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. Retrieved from
  16. Downes, S. (2011). Open educational resources: A definition. Retrieved from
  17. Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: Theory and technology. Morgan & Claypool, 1(1), 1–136.Google Scholar
  18. Hilton III, J. L., & Laman, C. (2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 27(3), 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ICESC. (1976). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. Retrieved from
  20. Lovett M., Meyer O., & Thille C. (2010). JIME-The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1), Art-13.Google Scholar
  21. MIT. (2001). MIT to make nearly all course materials available free on the World Wide Web. Retrieved from
  22. ODI. (2014a). Publisher’s guide to the open data rights statement vocabulary. Open Data Institute.
  23. ODI. (2014b). Re-user’s guide to the open data rights statement vocabulary. Open Data Institute.
  24. OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  25. OKF. (2012). Open Data Handbook Documentation. Release 1.0.0 Open Knowledge Foundation. Retrieved from
  26. Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., Lopez-Vargas, J., & Tovar, E. (2014a). An Architecture based on Linked Data technologies for the integration and reuse of OER in MOOCs context. Open Praxis, 6(2), 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piedra, N., López, J., Chicaiza, J., & Tovar, E. (2014b). Serendipity a platform to discover and visualize Open OER Data from OpenCourseWare repositories. Conference OpenCourseWare Consortium. 2014.
  28. Piedra, N., Tovar, E., Colomo-Palacios, R., López, J., & Chicaiza, J. (2014c). Consuming and producing linked open data: The case of Opencourseware. Emerald EarlyCite,. doi: 10.1108/PROG-07-2012-0045.Google Scholar
  29. Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., Lopez-Vargas, J., & Tovar, E. (2015a). Seeking open educational resources to compose massive open online courses in engineering education. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(5), 2015.Google Scholar
  30. Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., Quichimbo, P., Saquicela, V., Cadme, E., & López, J. et al. (2015b) Marco de Trabajo para la Integración de Recursos Digitales Basado en un Enfoque de Web Semántica. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas y Tecnologías de Información (RISTI). doi: 10.17013/risti.e3.55-70.
  31. Stallman, R. (1983). Initial announcement. GNU’s Not Unix! free software, free community. 1983.
  32. Syed, Z., Finin, T., & Joshi, A. (2008). Wikipedia as an ontology for describing documents. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tovar, E., Lopez-Vargas, J. A., Piedra, N. O, Chicaiza, J. A. (2013) Impact of open educational resources in higher education institutions in Spain and Latin America through social network analysis. 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, United States.Google Scholar
  34. UNESCO. (2000). The Dakar framework for action. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from
  35. UNESCO. (2002). UNESCO promotes new initiative for free educational resources on the internet. Retrieved June 29, 2010 from _edu_ress.shtml.
  36. UNESCO. (2012, June 20). 2012 Paris OER declaration. World OER Congress. Paris. Retrieved from
  37. United Nations. (1948, December 10). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). United Nations General Assembly, Paris. Retrieved from
  38. Vest, C. M. (2004). Why MIT decided to give away all its course materials via the internet. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(21). Retrieved from
  39. Villazón-Terrazas, B. (2011). A method for reusing and re-engineering non-ontological resources for building ontologies.Google Scholar
  40. White, D., & Manton. M. (2011) Open educational resources: The value of reuse in higher education. JISC-funded OER Impact Study, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Wiley, D. (2003). Learning objects: Difficulties and opportunities. Retrieved from
  42. Wiley, D. (2014). Defining the “Open” in Open Content. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nelson Piedra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Janneth Chicaiza
    • 1
  • Javiera Atenas
    • 2
  • Jorge Lopez-Vargas
    • 1
  • Edmundo Tovar
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad Técnica Particular de LojaLojaEcuador
  2. 2.School of Management, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Universidad Politécnica de MadridBoadilla del Monte, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations