Skip to main content

Shaping, Disinfection, and Obturation for Molars

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Guidebook to Molar Endodontics

Abstract

Shaping the canal system to promote disinfection and obturation is the cornerstone of molar endodontics. Clinical outcomes, both long and short term, hinge on the technical quality and attention to detail invested into this step. This chapter summarizes currently understood best practices, independent from specific instruments or technologies. A historically proved lead principle here, as in medicine in general, is “do not harm.”

Building on other chapters in this book, the rationale and literature supporting the must-haves and must-dos, techniques to fulfill the objectives for pertinent steps of shaping, cleaning, and filling during root canal treatment are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011;44:583–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spångberg LS. A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:825–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karabucak B, Bunes A, Chehoud C, Kohli MR, Setzer F. Prevalence of apical periodontitis in endodontically treated premolars and molars with untreated canal: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Endod. 2016;42:538–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pettiette MT, Delano EO, Trope M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod. 2001;27:124–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16:498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuttler S, McLean A, Dorn S, Fischzang A. The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:903–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leeb J. Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J Endod. 1983;9:463–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stabholz A, Rotstein I, Torabinejad M. Effect of preflaring on tactile detection of the apical constriction. J Endod. 1995;21:92–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters OA, Morgental RD, Schulze KA, Paqué F, Kooper PMP, Vier-Pelisser FV. Determining cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments used in lateral action. Int Endod J. 2014;47:505–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Izu KH, Thomas SJ, Zhang P, Izu AE, Michalek S. Effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite in preventing inoculation of periapical tissues with contaminated patency files. J Endod. 2004;30:92–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Souza R. The importance of apical patency and cleaning of the apical foramen on root canal preparation. Brazil Dent J. 2006;17:6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arias A, Azabal M, Hidalgo JJ, la Macorra de JC. Relationship between postendodontic pain, tooth diagnostic factors, and apical patency. J Endod. 2009;35:189–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu WC, Gyamfi J, Niu LN, Schoeffel GJ, Liu SY, Santarcangelo F, et al. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents involving facial ecchymosis - a review. J Dent. 2013;41:935–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cailleteau JG, Mullaney TP. Prevalence of teaching apical patency and various instrumentation and obturation techniques in United States dental schools. J Endod. 1997;23:394–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flanders DH. Endodontic patency. How to get it. How to keep it. Why it is so important? N Y State Dent J. 2002;68:30–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchanan LS. Management of the curved root canal. J Cal Dent Assoc. 1989;17:18–25. –7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez JAG, Duran-Sindreu F, Matos MA, Carabaño TG, Bellido MM, Castro SM, et al. Apical transportation created using three different patency instruments. Int Endod J. 2010;43:560–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vera J, Hernàndez EM, Romero M, Arias A, van der Sluis LWM. Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant penetration into the apical two millimeters of large root canals: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2012;38:1340–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vera J, Arias A, Romero M. Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant penetration into the apical third of root canals when using passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2011;37:1276–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vera J, Arias A, Romero M. Dynamic movement of intracanal gas bubbles during cleaning and shaping procedures: the effect of maintaining apical patency on their presence in the middle and cervical thirds of human root canals—an in vivo study. J Endod. 2012;38:200–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005;10:77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. West J. Endodontic update 2006. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18:280–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Association of Endodontists. Glossary of Endodontic Terms 2015 [accessed 2/27/2016]. Available from: http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/aae/endodonticglossary2015/.

  24. Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J. 1998;31:394–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu MK, Wesslink PR, Walton RE. Apical terminus location of root canal treatment procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE. Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2005;31:271–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nair PNR. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J. 2006;39:249–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Siqueira JF. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001;34:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu MK, Dummer PMH, Wesselink PR. Consequences of and strategies to deal with residual post-treatment root canal infection. Int Endod J. 2006;39:343–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Friedman S. Management of post-treatment endodontic disease: a current concept of case selection. Aus Endod J. 2000;26:104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Elayouti A, Weigner R, Löst C. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length. J Endod. 2002;28:116–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan BT, Messer HH. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size. J Endod. 2002;28:658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Patiño PV, Biedma BM, Liébana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod. 2005;31:114–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Location of contact areas on rotary Profile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 1999;32:108–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paque F, Balmer M, Attin T, Peters OA. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2010;36:703–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod. 2009;35:938–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonessio N, Arias A, Lomiento G, Peters OA. Effect of root canal treatment procedures with a novel rotary nickel titanium instrument (TRUShape) on stress in mandibular molars: a comparative finite element analysis. Odontology. 2016. epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival. Int Endod J. 2011;44:610–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Landys Boren D, Jonasson P, Kvist T. Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth at a public dental specialist clinic. J Endod. 2015;41:176–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Di Fiore PM. A dozen ways to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal Systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30:559–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54:323–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Boutsioukis C, Kishen A. Fluid dynamics of syringe-based irrigation to optimise anti-biofilm efficacy in root-canal disinfection. Roots. 2012;4:22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Basrani B, Haapasalo M. Update on endodontic irrigating solutions. Endod Topics. 2012;27(1):74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zehnder M. Root canal Iirrigants. J Endod. 2006;32:389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenfeld EF, James GA, Burch BS. Vital pulp tissue response to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1978;4:140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Svec TA, Harrison JW. Chemomechanical removal of pulpal and dentinal debris with sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide vs normal saline solution. J Endod. 1977;3:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod. 2005;31:863–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Boessler C, Peters OA, Zehnder M. Impact of lubricant parameters on rotary instrument torque and force. J Endod. 2007;33:280–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jungbluth H, Peters CI, Peters OA, Sener B, Zehnder M. Physicochemical and pulp tissue dissolution properties of some household bleach brands compared with a dental sodium hypochlorite solution. J Endod. 2012;38:372–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RNS, Fillery E, Manzur A. Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod. 2007;33:966–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Retamozo B, Shabahang S, Johnson N, Aprecio RM, Torabinejad M. Minimum contact time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite required to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2010;36:520–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gu L-S, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35:791–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J. 2009;42:144–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2005;31:166–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, DiVito E. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod. 2011;37:1008–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G. Effectiveness of the erbium: YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:273–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Peters OA, Paque F. Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2011;37:53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Haapasalo M, Wang Z, Shen Y, Curtis A, Patel P, Kakpour M. Tissue dissolution by a novel multisonic ultracleaning system and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2014;40:1178–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Clark-Holke D, Drake D, Walton R, Rivera E. Bacterial penetration through canals of endodontically treated teeth in the presence or absence of the smear layer. J Dent. 2003;31:275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:658–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Delivanis PD, Mattison GD, Mendel RW. The survivability of F43 strain of Streptococcus sanguis in root canals filled with gutta-percha and Procosol cement. J Endod. 1983;9:407–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6:142–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Oper Dent. 2008;33:526–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Okşan T, Aktener BO, Şen BH. The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinai tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 1993;26:301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wennberg A, Ørstavik D. Adhesion of root canal sealers to bovine dentine and gutta-percha. Int Endod J. 1990;23:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J. 2003;36:810–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Paqué F, Luder HU, Sener B, Zehnder M. Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod. 1987;13:147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Grawehr M, Sener B, Waltimo T, Zehnder M. Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Int Endod J. 2003;36:411–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Peters OA, Boessler C, Zehnder M. Effect of liquid and paste-type lubricants on torque values during simulated rotary root canal instrumentation. Int Endod J. 2005;38:223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Li GH, Niu LN, Zhang W, Olsen M, De-Deus G, Eid AA, et al. Ability of new obturation materials to improve the seal of the root canal system: a review. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1050–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ricucci D, Rocas IN, Alves FR, Loghin S, Siqueira Jr JF. Apically extruded sealers: fate and influence on treatment outcome. J Endod. 2016;42:243–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Wolcott JF, Hicks ML, Himel VT. Evaluation of pigmented intraorifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1999;25:589–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yamauchi S, Shipper G, Buttke T, Yamauchi M, Trope M. Effect of orifice plugs on periapical inflammation in dogs. J Endod. 2006;32:524–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod. 2010;36:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ruddle C. Shaping for success…everything old is new again. Dent Today. 2006;25:120–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ove A. Peters DMD, MS, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, O.A., Arias, A. (2017). Shaping, Disinfection, and Obturation for Molars. In: Peters, O. (eds) The Guidebook to Molar Endodontics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52901-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52901-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52899-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52901-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics