Abstract
The three common physical examinations that are used to aid in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are the anterior drawer test, Lachman’s test, and the pivot shift test. The anterior drawer test is the oldest and easiest maneuver to learn; however, various limitations contribute to a relatively low accuracy of this examination. The poor sensitivity of the anterior drawer test is improved when anesthesia is used and for patients with chronic, rather than acute, ACL injuries. Lachman’s test has the highest sensitivity of all three tests and is useful for ruling out complete ACL ruptures with a negative test result. The specificity of Lachman’s test is high, but the pivot shift test has the highest specificity of all three physical examinations. Thus a positive pivot shift test is most accurate in diagnosing an ACL insufficiency. Studies, particularly those before the year 2000, indicate that a negative pivot shift test does not provide useful information for exclusion, and improved results of the test performed with anesthesia indicate that these false-negative results are partially caused by muscle guarding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(5):267–288
Donaldson WF 3rd, Warren RF, Wickiewicz T (1985) A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations. Initial versus examination under anesthesia. Am J Sports Med 13(1):5–10
Draper DO, Schulthies SS (1995) Examiner proficiency in performing the anterior drawer and Lachman tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 22:263–266
Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop 147:45–50
Kim SJ, Kim HK (1995) Reliability of the anterior drawer test, the pivot shift test, and the Lachman test. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:237–242
Lange T, Freiberg A, Dröge P, Lützner J, Schmitt J, Kopkow C (2015) The reliability of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture – a systematic review. Man Ther 20(3):402–411
Leblanc MC, Kowalczuk M, Andruszkiewicz N, Simunovic N, Farrokhyar F, Turnbull TL, Debski RE, Ayeni OR (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3563-2
Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J (2003) Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(4):592–603
Mitsou A, Vallianatos P (1988) Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign. Injury 19:427–428
Mulligan EP, Harwell JL, Robertson WJ (2011) Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the Lachman test performed in a prone position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41(10):749–757
Paessler HH, Michel D (1992) How new is the Lachman test? Am J Sports Med 20:95–98
Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1992) Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Little, Brown and Co, Boston
Scholten RJ, Opstelten W, van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Deville WL, Bouter LM (2003) Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 52:689–694
Strobel M, Stedtfeld HW, Feagin JA, Telger TC (1990) Diagnostic evaluation of the knee. Springer, New York
Swain MS, Henschke N, Kamper SJ, Downie AS, Koes BW, Maher CG (2014) Accuracy of clinical tests in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Ther 22:25
Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V (1976) Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 4:84–93
van Eck CF, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM (2013) Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1895–1903
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 ISAKOS
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ayeni, O.R., de SA, D., Kay, J., Karlsson, J. (2017). Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examinations for ACL Injury. In: Nakamura, N., Zaffagnini, S., Marx, R., Musahl, V. (eds) Controversies in the Technical Aspects of ACL Reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52742-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52742-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52740-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52742-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)