Skip to main content

Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examinations for ACL Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Controversies in the Technical Aspects of ACL Reconstruction

Abstract

The three common physical examinations that are used to aid in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are the anterior drawer test, Lachman’s test, and the pivot shift test. The anterior drawer test is the oldest and easiest maneuver to learn; however, various limitations contribute to a relatively low accuracy of this examination. The poor sensitivity of the anterior drawer test is improved when anesthesia is used and for patients with chronic, rather than acute, ACL injuries. Lachman’s test has the highest sensitivity of all three tests and is useful for ruling out complete ACL ruptures with a negative test result. The specificity of Lachman’s test is high, but the pivot shift test has the highest specificity of all three physical examinations. Thus a positive pivot shift test is most accurate in diagnosing an ACL insufficiency. Studies, particularly those before the year 2000, indicate that a negative pivot shift test does not provide useful information for exclusion, and improved results of the test performed with anesthesia indicate that these false-negative results are partially caused by muscle guarding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(5):267–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donaldson WF 3rd, Warren RF, Wickiewicz T (1985) A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations. Initial versus examination under anesthesia. Am J Sports Med 13(1):5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Draper DO, Schulthies SS (1995) Examiner proficiency in performing the anterior drawer and Lachman tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 22:263–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop 147:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SJ, Kim HK (1995) Reliability of the anterior drawer test, the pivot shift test, and the Lachman test. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lange T, Freiberg A, Dröge P, Lützner J, Schmitt J, Kopkow C (2015) The reliability of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture – a systematic review. Man Ther 20(3):402–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leblanc MC, Kowalczuk M, Andruszkiewicz N, Simunovic N, Farrokhyar F, Turnbull TL, Debski RE, Ayeni OR (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3563-2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J (2003) Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(4):592–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitsou A, Vallianatos P (1988) Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a comparison between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign. Injury 19:427–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulligan EP, Harwell JL, Robertson WJ (2011) Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the Lachman test performed in a prone position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41(10):749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paessler HH, Michel D (1992) How new is the Lachman test? Am J Sports Med 20:95–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1992) Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Little, Brown and Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scholten RJ, Opstelten W, van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Deville WL, Bouter LM (2003) Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 52:689–694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strobel M, Stedtfeld HW, Feagin JA, Telger TC (1990) Diagnostic evaluation of the knee. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Swain MS, Henschke N, Kamper SJ, Downie AS, Koes BW, Maher CG (2014) Accuracy of clinical tests in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Ther 22:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V (1976) Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 4:84–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Eck CF, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM (2013) Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1895–1903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Karlsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ayeni, O.R., de SA, D., Kay, J., Karlsson, J. (2017). Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examinations for ACL Injury. In: Nakamura, N., Zaffagnini, S., Marx, R., Musahl, V. (eds) Controversies in the Technical Aspects of ACL Reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52742-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52742-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52740-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52742-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics