Skip to main content

A Harmony Search-Based Hybrid Intelligent Optimization Model for Order Planning with Learning Effects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision-making Models for Production and Retail Operations
  • 956 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses a multi-objective multi-site order planning (MMOP) problem in make-to-order manufacturing with the consideration of various real-world features such as production uncertainties and learning effects. The mathematical model for this order planning problem is presented with the objectives of minimizing the total tardiness of all orders, the total throughput time of all orders, and the total idle time of all production departments, respectively. A novel harmony search-based hybrid intelligent optimization (HSHIO) approach, integrating a harmony search-based Pareto optimization (HSPO) process and a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) process, is presented to handle this problem. Extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach based on industrial data. Results demonstrate that (1) the proposed approach can handle the problem investigated effectively; and (2) the HSPO process can generate the optimization performance superior to those generated by a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II)-based process and an industrial method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aburdene, M. F. (1988). Computer simulation of dynamical systems. Dubuque, IOWA, Wm: C. Brown Publishers.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., Banker, R., Menon, N., & Romero, J. (2011). Implementing enterprise resource planning systems: Organizational performance and the duration of the implementation. Information Technology and Management, 12(3), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J., & Uzsoy, R. (1995). Scheduling and order release in a single-stage production system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14(4), 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axsater, S. (2005). Planning order releases for an assembly system with random operation times. OR Spectrum, 27(2–3), 459–470.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beheshti, H., & Beheshti, C. (2010). Improving productivity and firm performance with enterprise resource planning. Enterprise Information Systems, 4(4), 445–472.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaret, B., Oguz, C., & Salman, F. (2012). A tabu search algorithm for order acceptance and scheduling. Computers & Operations Research, 39(6), 1197–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Pundoor, G. (2006). Order assignment and scheduling in a supply chain. Operations Research, 54(3), 555–572.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., & Prodhon, C. (2007). Supply planning under uncertainties in MRP environments: A state of the art. Annual Reviews In Control, 31(2), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiben, A. E., Raue, P. E., & Ruttkay, Z. (1994). Genetic algorithms with multi-parent recombination. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature—Ppsn Iii—International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Proceedings, 866, 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, N., & Carmo-Silva, S. (2011). Order release in a workload controlled flow-shop with sequence-dependent set-up times. International Journal of Production Research, 49(8), 2443–2454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C. M., & Fleming, P. J. (1996). On the performance assessment and comparison of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1141, 584–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geem, Z., Kim, J., & Loganathan, G. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, F., & Rogers, K. J. (2009). Order release and dispatching in a sequence dependent job shop. In Proceedings of PICMET 09—Technology Management in the Age of Fundamental Change, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordani, S., Lujak, M., & Martinelli, F. (2013). A distributed multi-agent production planning and scheduling framework for mobile robots. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search. Boston, MA, USA, Addison-Wesley: Optimization and Machine Learning.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guinet, A. (2001). Multi-site planning: A transshipment problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 74(1–3), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z. X., Wong, W. K., Leung, S. Y. S., Fan, J. T., & Chan, S. F. (2008). A genetic-algorithm-based optimization model for solving the flexible assembly line balancing problem with work sharing and workstation revisiting. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C—Applications and Reviews, 38(2), 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z. X., Wong, W. K., Li, Z., & Ren, P. (2013). Modeling and pareto optimization of multi-objective order scheduling problems in production planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64(4), 972–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z. X., Yang, C., Wang, W., & Yang, J. (2015). Harmony search-based multi-objective optimization model for multi-site order planning with multiple uncertainties and learning effects. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 83, 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janiak, A., & Rudek, R. (2009). Experience-based approach to scheduling problems with the learning effect. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A—Systems and Humans, 39(2), 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Z., Gao, L., Wang, L., Ge, Y., & Li, S. (2009). On an adaptive harmony search algorithm. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control, 5(9), 2551–2560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, C., & Lan, T. (2005). A combinatorial manufacturing resource planning model for long-term CNC machining industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(9–10), 1157–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Geem, Z., Lee, S., & Bae, K. (2005). The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization. Engineering Optimization, 37(7), 663–684.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, J., Li, H., & Pinedo, M. (2005). Order scheduling in an environment with dedicated resources in parallel. Journal of Scheduling, 8(5), 355–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, S., Tsang, S., Ng, W., & Wu, Y. (2007). A robust optimization model for multi-site production planning problem in an uncertain environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 224–238.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Loukil, T., Teghem, J., & Fortemps, P. (2007). A multi-objective production scheduling case study solved by simulated annealing. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(3), 709–722.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luh, G., & Chueh, C. (2009). A multi-modal immune algorithm for the job-shop scheduling problem. Information Sciences, 179(10), 1516–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi, M., Fesanghary, M., & Damangir, E. (2007). An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 188(2), 1567–1579.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Q., Suganthan, P., Tasgetiren, M., & Liang, J. (2010). A self-adaptive global best harmony search algorithm for continuous optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 216(3), 830–848.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, J. A., Pankaj, P., & Gonzalez, S. P. (2013). Decision making using a fuzzy induced linguistic ordered weighted averaging approach for evaluating risk in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology: doi:10.1007/s00170-00013-05311-00174, (in press).

  • Sadeghian, R. (2011). Continuous materials requirements planning (CMRP) approach when order type is lot for lot and safety stock is zero and its applications. Applied Soft Computing, 11(8), 5621–5629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakalli, U., Baykoc, O., & Birgoren, B. (2010). A possibilistic aggregate production planning model for brass casting industry. Production Planning & Control, 21(3), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakhlevich, N., Sotskov, Y., & Werner, F. (2000). Complexity of mixed shop scheduling problems: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 120(2), 343–351.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, K., Park, J., & Kim, Y. (2011). Multi-objective FMS process planning with various flexibilities using a symbiotic evolutionary algorithm. Computers & Operations Research, 38(3), 702–712.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stoop, P., & Wiers, V. (1996). The complexity of scheduling in practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(10), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, H., & Coit, D. (2008). Multi-objective scheduling problems: Determination of pruned Pareto sets. IIE Transactions, 40(5), 552–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timpe, C., & Kallrath, J. (2000). Optimal planning in large multi-site production networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(2), 422–435.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Huang, Y. (2010). Self-adaptive harmony search algorithm for optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2826–2837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., & Liang, T. (2005). Aggregate production planning with multiple fuzzy goals. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(5–6), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wazed, M., Ahmed, S., & Nukman, Y. (2010). A review of manufacturing resources planning models under different uncertainties: State-of-the-art and future directions. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Gen, M. (2010). Process planning and scheduling in distributed manufacturing system using multiobjective genetic algorithm. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical on Electronic Engineering, 5(1), 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L. (1999). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoxia Guo .

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 8.10, 8.11 and 8.12.

Table 8.10 Workload (standard man days) of each production process of each order (experiment 1)
Table 8.11 Workload (standard man days) of each production process of each order (experiment 2)
Table 8.12 Workload (standard man days) of each production process of each order (experiment 3)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guo, Z. (2016). A Harmony Search-Based Hybrid Intelligent Optimization Model for Order Planning with Learning Effects. In: Intelligent Decision-making Models for Production and Retail Operations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52681-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52681-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52679-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52681-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics