Skip to main content

Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis Within Surgical Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gastrointestinal Operations and Technical Variations

Abstract

Risk is an omnipresent and recurring concern within any surgical application. Even within routine procedures with a high likelihood of success and a limited probability of complications, intra- and postoperative complications may arise that place patients at risk for substantial health consequences. Equally challenging includes the task of communicating such risks to patients, where even slight changes to how risk is conveyed can substantially alter a patient’s perspective and wishes for potential surgical procedures in various applications. As such, physicians must be mindful not only of the likelihood and consequences of risk inherent within surgical applications, but also how such risks are discussed with patients and their families when discussing surgical and non-surgical options to address set health concerns. This chapter seeks to provide an overview and introduction to risk for such physicians, and offer insight regarding how tools of decision analysis may facilitate surgical decision making and frame the likelihood and consequence of potential complications to occur during and after such procedures are undertaken. Additional comments will be centered on the impact that risk communication may have upon patient decision making when considering surgical options. While introductory in nature, this chapter may serve as a helpful outline of how to understand, derive, and communicate risks that remain an intrinsic piece of all medical decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Linkov I, Moberg E. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies. 2011. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khuri SF, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs surgical risk study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(4):315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein P. Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. New York: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown A. Chapter 12. The ugly history. In: The best of Wilmott 2. Chichester; Wiley; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ore O. Pascal and the invention of probability theory. Am Math Mon. 1960;67(5):409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Apostol T. Calculus, volume II, vol. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korenkov M, Troidl H, Sauerland S. Individualized surgery in the time of evidence-based medicine. Annals of surgery. 2014;259(5).

    Google Scholar 

  9. McKinlay J, Potter D, Feldman H. Nonmedical influences on medical decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(5):769–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landro L. A. U. R. A. New ways to calculate the risks of surgery. The Wall Street Journal. 2010;2. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703422904575039110166900210.

  11. Weiss S, Kulikowski C, Amarel S, Safir A. A model-based method for computer-aided medical decision-making. Elsevier B.V.; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cairo MS, Cornelis M, Baruchel A, Bosly A, Cheson B, Pui C. Ribera JM, Rule S, Younes A, Coiffer B. 2007 ASCO annual meeting proceedings part I. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18S)(June 20 Supplement):17006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pignone M, Ransohoff DF. Cross-Model Comparisons to Improve the Value of Modeling The Case of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Medical Decision Making. 2011;31(4):524–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korenkov M, Weiner RA. Laparoscopic gastric banding and individual bariatric surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:158–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Linkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trump, B.D., Pabon, N., Barber, M., Hartz, R., Linkov, F., Linkov, I. (2017). Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis Within Surgical Applications. In: Korenkov, M., Germer, CT., Lang, H. (eds) Gastrointestinal Operations and Technical Variations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49878-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49878-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49876-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49878-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics