Advertisement

Telemedizin in der Schlaganfallbehandlung

  • Nicolas Völkel
  • Frank Kraus
  • Roman L. Haberl
  • Gordian J. HubertEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund der zunehmenden Zahl an zu erwartenden Schlaganfällen und dem Mangel an Expertinnen und Experten (besonders in den ländlichen Regionen) müssen innovative Wege gegangen werden, um eine flächendeckende Versorgung zu gewährleisten. Daher haben sich verschiedene Modelle von Tele-Stroke-Netzwerken in den vergangenen Jahren entwickelt. Einige Ansätze richten ihren Fokus ausschließlich auf die Thrombolyse, andere hingegen auf die Standardisierung der Therapie und effizientere Dienstgestaltung durch einen Zusammenschluss bereits etablierter Stroke Units. Darüber hinaus gibt es Modelle, welche das gesamte Spektrum der Schlaganfalltherapie in ländlichen Krankenhäusern aufbauen, die sogenannten Tele-Stroke Unit-Netzwerke. Solche Netzwerkstrukturen müssen an die geografischen Gegebenheiten und das jeweilige Gesundheitssystem angepasst werden. Am Beispiel des Telemedizinischen Projekts zur integrierten Schlaganfallversorgung (TEMPiS) in Süd-Ost-Bayern wird ein Tele-Stroke Unit-Netzwerk vorgestellt.

Literatur

  1. Agarwal S, Day DJ, Sibson L, Barry PJ, Collas D, Metcalf K, Cotter PE, Guyler P, O’Brien EW, O’Brien A, O’Kane D, Owusu-Agyei P, Phillips P, Shekhar R, Warburton EA (2014) Thrombolysis delivery by a regional telestroke network – experience from the U.K. national health service (The east of England telestroke project). J Am Heart Assoc 3(1):e000408Google Scholar
  2. Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Clauranau S, Kühn J, Vatankhah B, Schenkel J, Ickenstein GW, Haberl RL, Horn M, TEMPiS Group (2005) Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 36(2):287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U, Haberl RL, Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care Group (2006) Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the telemedic pilot project for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) in bavaria. Germany. Lancet Neurol 5(9):742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, can den Berg LA, Lingsam HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoom PJ, Wermer MJ, van Walderveen MA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostaven JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, MR CLEAN Investigators (2015) A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute Ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(1):11–20Google Scholar
  5. Bodechtel U, Puetz V (2013) Why telestroke networks? Rationale, implementation and results of the Stroke Eastern Saxony Network. J Neural Transm 120(Suppl. 1):43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, EXTEND-IA Investigators (2015) Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 372(24):1009–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CAST Collaborative Group (1997) CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 349(9066):1641–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Brott T, Cohen G, Davis S, Donna G, Grotta J, Howard G, Kaste M, Koga M, von Kummer R, Lansberg M, Lindley RI, Murray G, Olivot JM, Parsons M, Tilley B, Toni D, Toyoda K, Wahlgren N, Wardlaw J, Whiteley W, del Zoppo GJ, Baigent C, Sandercook P, Hacke W, Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists Collaborative Group (2014) Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 384(9958):1929–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei DF, Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA, Choe H, Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Lineras G, Mandzia JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD, ESCAPE Trial Investigators (2015) Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(11):1019–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Handschu R, Scibor M, Willaczek B, Nückel M, Heckmann JG, Asshoff D, Belohlavek D, Erbguth F, Schwab S, STENO Project (2008) Telemedicine in acute stroke: remote video-examination compared to simple telephone consultation. J Neurol 255(11):1792–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heuschmann PU, Busse O, Wagner M, Endres M, Villringer A, Röther J, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Berger K (2010) Schlaganfallhäufigkeit und Versorgung von Schlaganfallpatienten in Deutschland. Akt Neurol 37:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group (1997) The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 349(9065):1569–1581Google Scholar
  13. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miguel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, San Román L, Serena J, Abilleira S, Ribó M, Millán M, Urra X, Cardona P, López-Cancio E, Tomasello A, CastanaREVASCAT Trial Investigators (2015) Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(24):2296–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan K, Shuaib A, Whittaker T, Saggur M, Jeerakathil T, Butcher K, Crumley P (2010) Telestroke in Northern Alberta: a two year experience with remote hospitals. Can J Neurol Sci 37(6):808–813Google Scholar
  15. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, Brott TG, Toni D, Grotta JC, Albers GW, Kaste M, Marler JR, Hamilton SA, Tilley BC, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Hacke W, ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS and EPITHET rt-PA Study Group, Allen K, Mau J, Meier D, del Zoppo G, De Silva DA, Butcher KS, Parsons MW, Barber PA, Levi C, Bladin C, Byrnes G (2010) Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS and EPITHET trials. Lancet 375(9727):1695–1703Google Scholar
  16. Levine SR, Gorman M (1999) „Telestroke“: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke 30(2):464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meretoja A, Keshtkaran M, Saver JL, Tatlisumak T, Parsons MW, Kaste M, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Churilov L (2014) Stroke thrombolysis: save a minute, save a day. Stroke 45(4):1053–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Müller-Barna P, Schwamm LH, Haberl RL (2012) Telestroke increases use of acute stroke therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 25(1):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Müller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S, Bogdahn U, Wiedmann S, Heuschmann PU, Audebert HJ (2014) TeleStroke Units Serving as a Model of Care in Rural Areas. 10-Year Experience of the TeleMedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care. Stroke 45(9):2739–2744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Müller-Barna P, Boy S, Hubert G, Haberl RL (2015) Convincing quality of acute stroke care in TeleStroke Units. Eur Res Telemed 4:53-61Google Scholar
  21. RKI (2015) Gesundheit in Deutschland. Robert Koch-Institut, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Saver J (2006) Time is Brain – Quantified. Stroke 37(1):263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saver J, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle HP, Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, Baxter BW, Devlin TG, Lopes DK, Reddy VK, Reddy VK, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer OC, Jahan R, SWIFT PRIME Investigators (2015) Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous 56t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372(24):2285–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silva GS, Farrell S, Shandra E, Viswanathan A, Schwamm LH (2012) The status of telestroke in the United States: a survey of currently active stroke telemedicine programs. Stroke 43(8):2078–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration (2013) Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11(9):CD000197Google Scholar
  26. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp HB, Hacke W (2007) Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 6(3):215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Völkel
    • 1
  • Frank Kraus
    • 1
  • Roman L. Haberl
    • 1
  • Gordian J. Hubert
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Klinikum München-Herlaching, Abteilung für Neurologie und Neurologische IntensivmedizinMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations