Skip to main content

Breast Density Assessment Using Wavelet Features on Mammograms

  • Conference paper
Book cover Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2016

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Abstract

Breast density differs from almost entirely fatty to extremely dense tissue composition. In mammography screenings, physicians are often supported by computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems (CAD) whose detection rate is affected by the density of the breast. An automatic pre-assessment of breast density would enable a specific analysis adapted to each density class. Digital mammograms from the INbreast database [1] are decomposed into Haar-Wavelet components and several levels are used for classification. A random forest classifier is applied on the averaged Wavelet components for four class densities which yields an accuracy of 64.53% in CC-view and 51.22% in MLO-view. The 3-class problem with a combined class of medium densities yields an accuracy of 73.89% in CC-view and 67.80% in MLO-view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moreira IC, Amaral I, Domingues I, et al. INbreast: toward a dull-field digital mammographic database. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(2):236–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang J, Rangayyan RM, Xu J, et al. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009;13(2):236–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho WT, Lam PWT. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(2):133–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malich A, Fischer DR, Facius M, et al. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection. J Digit Imaging. 2005;18(3):227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density: measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heine JJ, Carston MJ, Scott CG, et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(11):3090–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADSR Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Am Coll Radiol; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haar A. On the theory of orthogonal function systems. Fundam Pap Wavelet Theory. 2006; p. 155–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, et al. The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 2009;11(1):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DSM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Int Med. 2015; p. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schebesch, F., Unberath, M., Andersen, I., Maier, A. (2016). Breast Density Assessment Using Wavelet Features on Mammograms. In: Tolxdorff, T., Deserno, T., Handels, H., Meinzer, HP. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2016. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49465-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics