Skip to main content

Quality of China’s New Urbanization and Ways for Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China’s New Urbanization

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to discuss the theoretical and analytical details of the urbanization quality of China’s urbanization. Ways to promote urbanization quality for New Urbanization development are also discussed. By first introducing the interrelated relationships among urbanization quality, speed and level, and three-dimensional indicator system is proposed to quantify urbanization quality. The three dimensions include the economic, social, and space domains. Detailed analytical approaches are outlined. The contemporary urbanization quality spatial distribution based on the quantification efforts is presented and discussed in detail as well. In the end, five specific improving strategies, namely balancing between urbanization rate and quality, abiding by local conditions, promoting intensive instead of extensive economic structure, integrating urban and rural development and focusing on multi-dimensional quality instead of quantity, are proposed and detailed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Regional water resources development and utilization rate refers to the ratio of used amount of water resources in the amount of available water resources within a watershed or region. It is an important indicator reflecting the degree of development and utilization of water resources. The international community generally believes that the development and utilization rate of a river should not exceed 40 % of its total amount of available water resources. China has six level 1 water zones in the North (Songhua River, Liaohe River, Haihe River, Yellow River, Huaihe River, and Yangtze River) and four in the South (Pearl River, Southeast Rivers, Southwest Rivers, and Northwest River). Based on China’s water resources development and utilization rate, the threshold values for Songhua River, Liaohe River, Haihe River, Yellow River, Huaihe River, Yangtze River, the Pearl River are set as 34, 38, 45, 36, 38, 31, 32, 35, 35, 35 %. Water resources development and utilization rate at different provincial units shall then be determined by the corresponding watersheds.

  2. 2.

    Based on minimum cropland per capita in 3 large areas of China calculated by Cai Yunlong et al. and according to the standard of food of 400 kg per capita, it is determined that during the period from 1980 to 1990 and the period from 1991 to 2008, the minimum cropland per capita in China are 1.54 and 1.28 mu (15 mu = 1 ha.) respectively; and the minimum cropland per capita in the east, the mid and the west of China are 0.84, 1.20 and 1.67 mu respectively.

References

  1. Chen Bochong, Hao Shouyi, Yang Xingxian. The Dynamic mechanism of the rapid development of urbanization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59(6): 1068–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang G H, Brada J C. 2006.The paradox of China’s growing under-urbanization. Economic Systems, (30): 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fang Chuanglin. 2010. The subhealthy urban development. People’s Tribune, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fang Chuanglin, Wang Deli. 2011. Comprehensive measures and improvement of Chinese urbanization development quality. Geographical Research, 30(11):1931–1946.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Yixing. 2005. The speed of urbanization is not the sooner the better. Scientific Decision-Making, (8): 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Chengliang, Yue Hongzhi, Li Ting. 2009. An empirical study on the efficiency of China’s economic growth and its factors: 1985–2007. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics,(9):52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sagar A D, Najam A. 1998.The human development index: a critical review. Ecological Economics, 25(3): 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Han Zenglin, Liu Tianbao. 2009. Analysis of the characteristics and spatial differenves of urbanization quality of cities at prefecture level and above in China. Geographical Research, 28(6): 1508–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The urban socio-economic survey team of national bureau of statistics. 2005. Annual report on urban development of China (2004).Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li Hong. 2007. Human development index: Leading the sustainable growth. On Economic Problems, (5): 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mu Huaizhong. 1997. Research on the appropriate level of social security. Economic Research Journal, (2): 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ye Yumin. 2001. Research on the quality of China’s urbanization. China Soft Science, (7):27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kong Fanwen, Xu Shiwei. 2006. China’s urbanization speed and quality issues.Shenyang: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan Xiaoling, Wang Xiao. 2008. Synthetic evaluation for urbanization quality of Shanxi province. Urban Studies, 15(2): 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng Yaping. 2006. Research into evaluation of the quality of China’s provincial wide urbanization level. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University, 16(6): 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanglin Fang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and Science Press Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fang, C., Yu, D. (2016). Quality of China’s New Urbanization and Ways for Improvement. In: China’s New Urbanization. Springer Geography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49448-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics