Abstract
For a long time, urban rail transit operators have been subject to government safety issues at all levels. Moreover, with the increasing complexity of the subway car equipment, the failure rate increased accordingly. Therefore, the research of how to diagnose mechanical fault in an efficient, rapid, and accurate way is an important issue. This paper conscientiously sums up the world rail fault diagnosis technology at the present stage by summarizing and analyzing the daily employment of the equipment and the occurrence of fault. And we chose causal graph theory in this paper to establish the causal graph model of traction system which can graphically represent direct causal relationship between failures, and constrain no restriction in graphical topology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang Y et al (2013) Roller bearing safety region estimation and state identification based on LMD–PCA–LSSVM. Measurement 46(3):1315–1324 (in Chinese)
Gao K, Jianming L et al (2011) A hybrid security situation prediction model for information network based on support vector machine and particle swarm optimization. Power Syst Technol 35(4):176–182
Endsley MR, Sollenberger R, Stein E (2000) Situation awareness: a comparison of measures. In: Proceedings of the human performance, situation awareness and automation: user-centered design for the New Millennium
Qin Y, Zhang Z, Liu X, Li M, Kou L (2015) Dynamic risk assessment of metro station with interval type-2 fuzzy set and TOPSIS method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst (in Chinese)
Ran B, Boyce D (2012) Dynamic urban transportation network models: theory and implications for intelligent vehicle-highway systems. Springer Science & Business Media
Ha M, Wang C, Chen J (2013) The support vector machine based on intuitionist fuzzy number and kernel function. Soft Comput 17(4):635–641
Frank PM Analytical and qualitative model based fault diagnosis—a survey and some new results. Eur J Control 5(2):6–28
Butler SA, Fischbeck P (2001) Multi-attribute risk assessment. Technical Report CMD-CS-01-169, December 2001, 2–10 p
Sheyller O (2004) Scenario graphs and attack graphs. School of Computer Science, Camegie Mello University, Pittsburgh, USA, 15–34 p
Krsul IV (1998) Software vulnerability analysis. Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA, 5–20 p
Billinton R, Allan RN (1996) Reliability evaluation of power system. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, New York, pp 1–16
Billinton R, Wenyuan L (1994) Reliability assessment of electric power systems using monte carlo methods. Plenum Press, New York, pp 305–308
Deb S, Pattipati KR, Raghvavn V et al (1995) Multi-signal flow graphs: a novel approach for system testability analysis and fault diagnosis. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag 10(5):14–25
Zhang SZ, Zhang ZN, Yang NH et a1 (2004) An improved EM algorithm for Bayesian networks parameter learning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, Shanghai, China (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Qin, Y., Zhou, Y. (2016). Probabilistic Reasoning-Based Rail Train Electric Traction System Vulnerability Analysis. In: Jia, L., Liu, Z., Qin, Y., Ding, R., Diao, L. (eds) Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies for Rail Transportation. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 377. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49367-0_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49367-0_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49365-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49367-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)