Skip to main content

Solving the Problem of Selecting Suitable Objective Measures by Clustering Association Rules Through the Measures Themselves

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM 2016: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2016)

Abstract

Many objective measures (OMs) were proposed since they are frequently used to discover interesting association rules. Therefore, an important challenge is to decide which OM to use. For that, one can: (a) reduce the number of OMs to be chosen; (b) aggregate OMs’ values in only one importance value as a mean of not selecting a suitable OM. The problem with (a) is that many OMs can remain. Regarding (b), the problem is that the obtained values cannot be well understandable. This work proposes a process to solve the problem related to the identification of a suitable OM to direct the users towards the interesting patterns. The goal is to find the same interesting patterns, as if the most suitable OM had been used, also trying to reduce the exploration space to minimize the user’s effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Developed by Christian Borgelt: http://www.borgelt.net/apriori.html.

  2. 2.

    In fact, the cuts 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45 and 0.50 were tested to see the impact of them in the results. As all of them behaved similarly, being the analysis described in Sect. 5 basically the same to all of them, we decided to present here only the results obtained in the first and in the last cut.

  3. 3.

    http://www.r-project.org/.

References

  1. Tew, C., Giraud-Carrier, C., Tanner, K., Burton, S.: Behavior-based clustering and analysis of interestingness measures for association rule mining. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 28(4), 1004–1045 (2014)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Belohlavek, R., Grissa, D., Guillaume, S., Nguifo, E.M., Outrata, J.: Boolean factors as a means of clustering of interestingness measures of association rules. ann. math. artif. intell. 70(1–2), 151–184 (2014)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillaume, S., Grissa, D., Mephu Nguifo, E.: Categorization of Interestingness Measures for Knowledge Extraction. CoRR, vol. ArXiv e-prints (2012). abs/1206.6741

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huynh, X.-H., Guillet, F., Blanchard, J., Kuntz, P., Briand, H., Gras, R.: A graph-based clustering approach to evaluate interestingness measures: a tool and a comparative study. Qual. Measures Data Min. Stud. Comput. Intell. 43, 25–50 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouker, S., Saidi, R., Yahia, S.B., Nguifo, E.M.: Mining undominated association rules through interestingness measures. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 23(4), 22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen Le, T.T., Huynh, H.X., Guillet, F.: Finding the most interesting association rules by aggregating objective interestingness measures. In: Richards, D., Kang, B.-H. (eds.) PKAW 2008. LNCS, vol. 5465, pp. 40–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bong, K.K., Joest, M., Quix, C., Anwar, T., Manickam, S.: Selection and aggregation of interestingnes measures: a review. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. technol. 59(1), 146–166 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bong, K.K., Joest, M., Quix, C., Anwar, T.: Automated interestingness measure selection for exhibition recommender systems. In: Nguyen, N.T., Attachoo, B., Trawiński, B., Somboonviwat, K. (eds.) ACIIDS 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8397, pp. 221–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Djenouri, Y., Drias, H., Habbas, Z., Chemchem, A.: Organizing association rules with meta-rules using knowledge clustering. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Programming and Systems, pp. 109–115 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Carvalho, V.O., dos Santos, F.F., Rezende, S.O., de Padua, R.: PAR-COM: a new methodology for post-processing association rules. In: Zhang, R., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 102, pp. 66–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding Groups in Data: an Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegel, S., Castellan Jr, N.J.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank FAPESP and CAPES for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica Oliveira de Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Carvalho, V.O., de Padua, R., Rezende, S.O. (2016). Solving the Problem of Selecting Suitable Objective Measures by Clustering Association Rules Through the Measures Themselves. In: Freivalds, R., Engels, G., Catania, B. (eds) SOFSEM 2016: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9587. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49192-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49192-8_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49191-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49192-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics