Skip to main content

Bony Defects in Revision ACL Surgery (ICL 19)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ESSKA Instructional Course Lecture Book

Abstract

Revision ACL reconstruction has been reported to have poorer outcomes compared to primary ACL reconstruction [1–3]. There are many potential reasons for this, including the status of the menisci and articular surfaces. However, if faced with a failed ACL reconstruction, the surgeon needs to understand why the reconstruction failed and what can be done to reduce the risk of failure of the revision procedure. Whatever the cause of failure of the primary procedure, the success of the revision ACL reconstruction relies on obeying all of the principles that one would apply for a successful outcome after a primary procedure. Amongst these is the prerequisite for optimal tunnel positioning in good-quality host bone. This instructional course lecture addresses the specific issue of how to deal with bony defects in revision ACL surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gifstad T, Drogset JO, Viset A, Grontvedt T, Hortemo GS. Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(9):2011–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiler A, Schmeling A, Stohr I, Kaab MJ, Wagner M. Primary versus single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1643–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright R, Spindler K, Huston L, Amendola A, Andrish J, Brophy R, Carey J, Cox C, Flanigan D, Jones M, Kaeding C, Marx R, Matava M, McCarty E, Parker R, Vidal A, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Dunn W. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes: MOON cohort. J Knee Surg. 2011;24(4):289–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BB, Mann BJ, Stuart MJ. Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):1979–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trojani C, Sbihi A, Djian P, Potel JF, Hulet C, Jouve F, Bussiere C, Ehkirch FP, Burdin G, Dubrana F, Beaufils P, Franceschi JP, Chassaing V, Colombet P, Neyret P. Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnussen RA, Debieux P, Benjamin B, Lustig S, Demey G, Servien E, Neyret P. A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(7):1298–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Quatman CE, Paterno MV, Wordeman SC, Kaeding CC. Longitudinal anterior knee laxity related to substantial tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament revision. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(8):1160–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas NP, Kankate R, Wandless F, Pandit H. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a 2-stage technique with bone grafting of the tibial tunnel. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(11):1701–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The MARS Group. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2301–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robert H, Es-Sayeh J. The role of periosteal flap in the prevention of femoral widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12(1):30–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shino K, Mae T, Nakamura N. Surgical technique: revision ACL reconstruction with a rectangular tunnel technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(3):843–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Usman MA, Kamei G, Adachi N, Deie M, Nakamae A, Ochi M. Revision single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with over-the-top route procedure. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1):71–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian A. Feller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 ESSKA

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feller, J.A., Williams, A., Eriksson, K., Siebold, R. (2016). Bony Defects in Revision ACL Surgery (ICL 19). In: Becker, R., Kerkhoffs, G., E. Gelber, P., Denti, M., Seil, R. (eds) ESSKA Instructional Course Lecture Book . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49114-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49114-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49113-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49114-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics