Abstract
Revision ACL reconstruction has been reported to have poorer outcomes compared to primary ACL reconstruction [1–3]. There are many potential reasons for this, including the status of the menisci and articular surfaces. However, if faced with a failed ACL reconstruction, the surgeon needs to understand why the reconstruction failed and what can be done to reduce the risk of failure of the revision procedure. Whatever the cause of failure of the primary procedure, the success of the revision ACL reconstruction relies on obeying all of the principles that one would apply for a successful outcome after a primary procedure. Amongst these is the prerequisite for optimal tunnel positioning in good-quality host bone. This instructional course lecture addresses the specific issue of how to deal with bony defects in revision ACL surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gifstad T, Drogset JO, Viset A, Grontvedt T, Hortemo GS. Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(9):2011–8.
Weiler A, Schmeling A, Stohr I, Kaab MJ, Wagner M. Primary versus single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1643–52.
Wright R, Spindler K, Huston L, Amendola A, Andrish J, Brophy R, Carey J, Cox C, Flanigan D, Jones M, Kaeding C, Marx R, Matava M, McCarty E, Parker R, Vidal A, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Dunn W. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes: MOON cohort. J Knee Surg. 2011;24(4):289–94.
Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BB, Mann BJ, Stuart MJ. Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):1979–86.
Trojani C, Sbihi A, Djian P, Potel JF, Hulet C, Jouve F, Bussiere C, Ehkirch FP, Burdin G, Dubrana F, Beaufils P, Franceschi JP, Chassaing V, Colombet P, Neyret P. Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):196–201.
Magnussen RA, Debieux P, Benjamin B, Lustig S, Demey G, Servien E, Neyret P. A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(7):1298–306.
Quatman CE, Paterno MV, Wordeman SC, Kaeding CC. Longitudinal anterior knee laxity related to substantial tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament revision. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(8):1160–3.
Thomas NP, Kankate R, Wandless F, Pandit H. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a 2-stage technique with bone grafting of the tibial tunnel. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(11):1701–9.
The MARS Group. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2301–10.
Robert H, Es-Sayeh J. The role of periosteal flap in the prevention of femoral widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12(1):30–5.
Shino K, Mae T, Nakamura N. Surgical technique: revision ACL reconstruction with a rectangular tunnel technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(3):843–52.
Usman MA, Kamei G, Adachi N, Deie M, Nakamae A, Ochi M. Revision single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with over-the-top route procedure. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1):71–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 ESSKA
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feller, J.A., Williams, A., Eriksson, K., Siebold, R. (2016). Bony Defects in Revision ACL Surgery (ICL 19). In: Becker, R., Kerkhoffs, G., E. Gelber, P., Denti, M., Seil, R. (eds) ESSKA Instructional Course Lecture Book . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49114-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49114-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49113-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49114-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)