Synercube: A Scientific Theory for Shaping Efficient Organizational Relationship

  • Anatoly Zankovsky
  • Christiane von der Heiden


In terms of system approach, any organization is a set of elements and their interconnections, which function as an integral whole (Katz and Kahn 1966). In order to maintain this wholeness, organizations need resources (information, energy, funds, personnel, materials, equipment, etc.) that can be gotten from outside and are necessary for the organization’s activity. While functioning, an organization transforms resources into results (product, goods, services, information, etc.) that are brought back to the outside environment, returning a profit. In turn, the profit allows getting new resources and resuming the transformational cycle. Thus, each and every organization is an open system that is constantly interacting with the outside environment (s. Fig. 2.1).


Staff Member Leadership Style Corporate Culture Organizational Goal Organizational Leadership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



  1. Bass B (1960) Leadership, psychology and organizational behavior. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennis W, Nanus B (1985) Fuehrungskraefte: Die vier Schluesselstrategien erfolgreichen Fuehrens. Campus Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  3. Beugre C (1998) Managing fairness in organizations. Quorum Books, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake R, Adams McCanse A (1992) Das GRID Fuehrungsmodel. ECON Verlag GmbH, DuesseldorfGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake R, Mouton J (1964) The managerial grid. Gulf Publishing, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  6. Creusen U, Bock R, Thiele C (2013) Fuehrung ist dreidimensional. In: Crisand E, Raab G, Crisand N (eds) Arbeitshefte Fuehrungspsychologie, vol 69. Windmuehle Verlag, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  7. Durkheim E (1924) Sociologie et Philosophie. F. Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Durkheim E (1950) Leçons de sociologic. Presses universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Ermolayeva EP (2008) Psychology of social realization in occupation. IPRAS Publishing House, Moscow (Russian version)Google Scholar
  10. Fiedler F (1967) A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Filley A, House R, Kerr S (1976) Managerial process and organizational behavior, 2nd edn. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, ILGoogle Scholar
  12. Hersey P, Blanchard K (1993) Management of organization behavior utilizing human resources, 8th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz D, Kahn R (1966) The social psychology of organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Kehne T (2009) Laesst sich Verantwortung normen? Ueberlegungen zu Rolle und Funktion von Standards im Themenfeld Corporate Social Responsibility. In: AÔlaender M, Senge K (Publ) Corporate Social Responsibility im Einzelhandel. Metropolis, Marburg, pp 209–236Google Scholar
  15. Kupreychenko A (2008) Psychology of trust and distrust. IPRAS Publishing House, Moscow (Russian version)Google Scholar
  16. Lane C, Bachmann R (eds) (1998) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawler E (1992) The ultimate advantage: create the high involvement organization. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Likert R (1961) New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Locke E (1991) The essence of leadership. Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrial civilization. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Misumi J (1985) The behavioural science of leadership: an interdisciplinary Japanese research program. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  22. Mowday R, Porter L, Steers R (1982) Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Parygin B (1973) Management and leadership. LGPU, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  24. Reddin W (1970) Managerial effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Robbins S, Judge T (2009) Organizational behavior. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Roethlisberger F, Dickson W (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheppard B, Lewicki R, Minton J (1992) Organizational justice: the search for fairness in the workplace. Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Steiner I (1972) Group process and productivity. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Stogdill R (1974) Handbook of leadership: a survey of theory and research. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Yukl G (1994) Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  31. Zankovsky A (2011) Psychology of leadership: from behavioural model to value/cultural paradigm. IPRAS Publishing House, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhuravlev A (2005) Psychology of collective performance. IPRAS Publishing House, Moscow (Russian version)Google Scholar
  33. Zhuravlev A, Kupreychenko A (2003) Ethics in psychological regulation of business activity. IPRAS Publishing House, Moscow (Russian version)Google Scholar


  1. Bass B (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Org Dyn 18(3):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake R, Mouton J (1982) A comparative analysis of situationalism and 9.9 management by principle. Org Dyn 10(4):20–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell C, Hayes L, Long DT (2010) Leadership, trustworthiness, and ethical stewardship. J Bus Ethics 96:497–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conger J (1990) The dark side of leadership. Org Dyn 19(2):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleischman E, Harris E (1962) Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Pers Psychol 15(2):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hersey P, Blanchard К (1982) Leadership style: attitudes and behaviors. Train Dev J 36:50–52Google Scholar
  7. Hosmer LT (1995) Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Acad Manage Rev 20:379–403MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Ingham A, Levinger G, Graves J, Peckman V (1974) The Ringelmann effect: studies of group size and group performance. J Exp Soc Psychol 10:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kristof-Brown A, Zimmerman R, Johnson E (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. J Pers Psychol 58:281–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kravitz D, Martin B (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(5):936–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larson L, Hunt J, Osborn R (1976) The great Hi-Hi leader behavior myth: a lesson from Occam’s Razor. Acad Manage J 19(4):628–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewin K, Lippitt R (1938) An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: a preliminary note. Sociometry 1:292–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Misumi J, Shirakashi S (1966) An experimental study of the effects of supervisory behavior on productivity and moral in a hierarchical organization. Hum Relat 19:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moede W (1927) Die Richtlinien der Leistungs-Psychologie. Industrielle Psychotechnik 4:193–209Google Scholar
  15. Nystrom P (1978) Managers and the Hi-Hi leader myth. Acad Manage J 21(2):325–331MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Radoilska L (2008) Truthfulness and business. J Bus Ethics 79:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ringelmann M (1913) Recherches sur les moteurs animes: Travail de l’homme. Annales de l’Institut National Agronomique, 2e série-tome XII, 1–40Google Scholar
  18. Tannenbaum R, Schmidt W (1973) How to choose a leadership pattern. Harv Bus Rev 51:162–180Google Scholar
  19. Turker D (2009) How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. J Bus Ethics 89:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Vianen A, De Pater I, Van Dijk F (2007) Work value fit and turnover intention: some source or different source fit. J Manage Psychol 22(2):188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vroom V (1973) A new look at managerial decision making. Organ Dyn 1(4):66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vroom V, Jago A (1978) On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. J Appl Psychol 63:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Westerman J, Cyr L (2004) An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories. Int J Sel Assess 12(3):252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yammarino F, Bass B (1990) Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Hum Relat 43:975–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Master Thesis

  1. Schumacher S (2014) Leadership dimensions: an empirical integration. Master Thesis, University of Osnabrueck, OsnabrueckGoogle Scholar


  1. Misumi J (1972) An empirical study of political leadership. In: Bulletin of the Institute for Industry and Labour. Kyushu University, S. 57 (Japanese Version)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anatoly Zankovsky
    • 1
  • Christiane von der Heiden
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychologisches InstitutMoskauRussia
  2. 2.Synercube GmbHLeverkusenGermany

Personalised recommendations