Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unpacking the Digital Backpack for the Adult Learner – A Universal Design for Learning Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology in Education. Technology-Mediated Proactive Learning (ICTE 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 559))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2632 Accesses

Abstract

Technology is able to overlap curriculum with learning by providing network resources, connectivity and organization. Learners can choose to move away from tangible learning resources and house them within network or cloud-based applications. The connectivity is a key advantage that provides learners easy access. The technology also allows the learner to organise and accomplish their learning tasks more efficiently. A learner’s digital backpack in the practice of pedagogy is an example of such a concept. A digital backpack is exactly what it sounds like: a virtual bag with an array of digital tools, resources, and instructional materials selected to engage and support learners. This article presents the digital backpack for adult learners. The backpack is anchored on the design concepts and principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL), an instructional design framework that supports diverse means of knowledge representation to develop learner’s knowledge and understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Center of Applied Special Technology CAST. Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rose, D.H., Meyer, A., Hitchcock, C.: The Universally Designed Classroom: Accessible Curriculum and Digital Technologies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoagland, C., Aplyn, E., Rice, M.: The digital backpack: issues in the development and implementation of a digital portfolio. In: Montgomerie, C., Viteli, J. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001, pp. 759–761. AACE, Chesapeake (2001). http://www.editlib.org/p/8237. Accessed 17 August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amirian, S.: Digital backpacks: facilitating faculty implementation of technologies for teaching and learning. Comput. Sch. 24, 5–14 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Millea, J., Green, I., Putland, G.: Emerging technologies: A framework for thinking. Australian Capital Territory Department of Education and Training (2005). Accessed 1 October 2005

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oblinger, D., Oblinger, J.: Is it age or IT: first steps toward understanding the net generation. Educ. Net Gener. 2(1–2), 20 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rose, D., Dalton, B.: Learning to read in the digital age. Mind Brain Educ. 3(2), 74–83 (2009). Accessed http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=1751-2271&site=1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basham, J.D., Meyer, H., Perry, E.: The design and application of the digital backpack. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 42(4), 339–359 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Center of Applied Special Technology (CAST). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 1.0. Wakefield, MA: Author (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rose, D. H., Gravel, J.W.: Curricular Opportunities in the Digital Age. Students at the Centre Series: Nellie Mae Educational Foundation (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., Jackson, R.: Providing new access to the general curriculum universal design for learning. Counc. Except. Educ. 35(2), 8–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rose, D.H., Meyer, A.: Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rose, D.H., Meyer, A.: A Practical Reader in Universal Design for Learning. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, S., Kuh, G.D.: Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Res. High. Educ. 43(5), 555–575 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eagleton, M.: Universal design for learning. Research Starters (2008). www.ebscohost.com/uploads/thisTopic-dbTopic-1073.pdf Accessed 17 August 2015

  17. Finn, D.: Principles of adult learning: an ESL context. J. Adult Educ. 40, 34–39 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marschall, S., Davis, C.: A Conceptual framework for teaching critical reading to adult college students. Adult Learn. 23(2), 63–68 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chong, S.N., Cheah, H.M.: Demographic trends: impact on schools. New Horiz. Educ. 58(1), 1–15 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singapore Department of Statistics: Latest Key Indicators (2013). http://www.singstat.gov.sg. Accessed 22 August 2015

  21. Chong, S., Loh, W.M., Babu, M: The Millennial Learner: a new generation of adult learners in higher education. Adv. Sch. Teach. Learn. 2(2) (2015). http://tlc.unisim.edu.sg/research/AdvSoTL-3/pdf/chong_loh_babu.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2015

  22. Gopinathan, S., Lee, M.H.: Challenging and co-opting globalisation: Singapore’s strategies in higher education. J. High. Educ. Policy Manage. 33(3), 287–299 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MOE (Ministry of Education): Report of the Committee on University Education. Pathways Beyond 2015 (CUEP). Singapore (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. SIM (2014). http://www.unisim.edu.sg/about-unisim/Overview/Pages/Facts-Figures.aspx. Accessed 17 August 2015

  25. Reay, D.: Class, authenticity and the transition to higher education for mature students. Sociol. Rev. 50(3), 398–418 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Merriam, S.B., Brockett, R.G.: The Profession and Practice of Adult Education: An Introduction. Wiley, San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moore, K.: The three-part harmony of adult learning, critical thinking, and decision making. J. Adult Educ. 39(1), 1–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clemente, K.A.: Experiences of Adult Students in Multi-Generational Community College Classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cranton, P.: Teaching for transformation. New Dir. Adult Continuing Educ. 2002(93), 63–72 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bash, L.: Adult Learners in the Academy. Anker Publishing Company Inc., Bolton (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Knowles, M.S.: The Modern Practice of Adult Education, vol. 41. Association Press, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Knowles, M.S.: The Adult Learn. A Negl. Species. American Society for Training and Development, Madison (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Knowles, M.S.: Andragogy in Action. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samaroo, S., Cooper, E., Green, T.: Pedandragogy: A way forward to self-engaged learning. New Horiz. Adult Educ. Hum. Res. Dev. 25(3), 76–90 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Henschke, J.A.: Considerations regarding the future of andragogy. Adult Learn. 22(1), 34–37 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Halx, M.D.: Re-conceptualizing college and university teaching through the lens of adult education: regarding undergraduates as adults. Teach. High. Educ. 15(5), 519–530 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor, B., Kroth, M.: Andragogy’s transition into the future: Meta-analysis of andragogy and its search for a measurable instrument. J. Adult Educ. 38(1), 1–11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cercone, K.: Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE J. 16(2), 137–159 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Edyburn, D.L.: Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learn. Disabil. Q. 33(1), 33–41 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sims, R.: Beyond instructional design: making learning design a reality. J. Learn. Des. 1(2), 1–7 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7(2), 95–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Matzen, N.J., Edmunds, J.A.: Technology as a catalyst for change: the role of professional development. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 39(4), 417–443 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SIM University, 535A Clementi Road, Singapore, 599490, Singapore

    Sylvia Chong

Authors
  1. Sylvia Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Chong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. HKU School of Professional and Continuing Education, pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Jeanne Lam

  2. Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong

    Kwan Keung Ng

  3. The Open University of Hong Kong, Homantin, Hong Kong

    Simon K.S. Cheung

  4. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Tai Po, Hong Kong

    Tak Lam Wong

  5. The Open University of Hong Kong, Homantin, Hong Kong

    Kam Cheong Li

  6. Caritas Institute of Higher Education, Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong

    Fu Lee Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chong, S. (2015). Unpacking the Digital Backpack for the Adult Learner – A Universal Design for Learning Approach. In: Lam, J., Ng, K., Cheung, S., Wong, T., Li, K., Wang, F. (eds) Technology in Education. Technology-Mediated Proactive Learning. ICTE 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 559. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48977-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48978-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation