Zusammenfassung
Neben den normalen Befunden, Normvarianten und unspezifischen Befunden gibt es eine Anzahl wichtiger Differenzialdiagnosen, die bei der medizinischen Beurteilung von Befunden möglicherweise missbrauchter Kinder zu berücksichtigen sind. Aufgrund der erheblichen psychosozialen und juristischen Implikationen einer falsch positiven Diagnose eines sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs ist die Kenntnis dermatologischer, infektiöser, systemischer und anderer Erkrankungen im Anogenitalbereich von großer Bedeutung. Dies gilt insbesondere angesichts der geringen Rate diagnostischer Befunde bei missbrauchten Kindern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Balevic S, Taylor M, Amaya M (2013) Penile and Scrotal Swelling Mimicking Child Abuse. Clin Pediatr 2013 52: 988–990
Banaschak S, Brinkmann B (1999) The role of clinical forensic medicine in cases of sexual child abuse. For Sci Int 99: 85–91
Bond GR, Dowd MD, Landsman I, Rimsza M (1995) Unintentional perianal injury in prepubescent girls: a multicenter, prospective report of 56 girls. Pediatrics 95: 628–631
Boos SC (1999) Accidental hymenal injury mimicking sexual trauma. Pediatrics 103: 1287–1289
Boos SC, Rosas AJ, Boyle C, McCann J (2003) Anogenital injuries in child pedestrians run over by low-speed motor vehicles: Four cases with findings that mimic child sexual abuse. Pediatrics;112:e77-e84
Frasier L (2011) Medical conditions that mimic sexual abuse. In: Kaplan R, Adams JA, Starling SP, Giardino AP: Medical response to child sexual abuse. A resource for professionals working with children and families. STM Learning, St. Louis, S 145–166
Herrmann B, Crawford J (2002) Genital injuries in prepubertal girls from inline skating accidents. Pediatrics 110: e 16 pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/2/e16
Herrmann B, Veit S, Neises M (1998) Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Wichtige Differentialdiagnose zu sexuellem Mißbrauch von Kindern. Päd Prax 55: 319–324
Hornor G (2009) Common Conditions That Mimic Findings of Sexual Abuse. J Paediatr Health Care 23: 283–288
Isaac R, Lyn M, Triggs N (2007) Lichen Sclerosus in the differential diagnosis of suspected child abuse cases. Pediatr Emerg Care 23: 482–485
Kellogg ND, Frasier L (2009) Conditions mistaken for child sexual abuse. In: Reece RM, Christian CW (eds) Child abuse: Medical diagnosis and management, 3rd edn. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, pp 389–426
Mallants C, Casteels K (2008) Practical approach to childhood masturbation – A review. Eur J Pediatr 167: 1111–1117
Mogielnicki NP, Schwartzman JD, Elliott JA (2000) Perineal group A streptococcal disease in a pediatric population. Pediatrics 106: 274–281
Sugar NF, Feldman KW (2007) Perineal impalements in children: Distinguishing accidents from abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 23: 605-616
Vunda A, Vandertuin L, Gervaix A (2011) Urethral prolapse: An overlooked diagnosis of urogenital bleeding in pre-menarcheal girls. J Pediatr 158: 682–683
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herrmann, B., Dettmeyer, R., Banaschak, S., Thyen, U. (2016). Differenzialdiagnosen zu Befunden nach sexuellem Missbrauch eines Kindes. In: Kindesmisshandlung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48844-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48844-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48843-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48844-7
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)