Skip to main content
  • 2649 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die ersten erfolgreichen Dialysen wurden bei Erwachsenen in den 1940er Jahren, bei Kindern in den 1950er Jahren durchgeführt. Der technische Aufwand war enorm und die Realisierbarkeit anfänglich auf wenige Monate beschränkt. Mit modernen Dialyseverfahren sind erfolgreiche Peritonealdialysebehandlungen über mehr als 10 Jahre keine Seltenheit, mit der Hämodialyse wurden Patienten in Einzelfällen über mehr als 40 Jahre behandelt. Dennoch ist in aller Regel angesichts der besseren Langzeitprognose und der höheren Lebensqualität primär eine Nierentransplantation anzustreben. Für die vielen Jahrzehnte Lebenserwartung pädiatrischer Patienten mit CKD5 und angesichts des gravierenden Mangels an Spenderorganen haben jedoch beide Dialyseverfahren einen wesentlichen Stellenwert und erhebliche prognostische Bedeutung. In der Intensivmedizin ist die Akutdialyse in allen Altersklassen unverzichtbar und oft lebensrettend. Bei der Auswahl der Dialyse muss die zu Grunde liegende Erkrankung, die Art der Vergiftung und das Ausmaß der Überwässerung berücksichtigt werden. Wasserlösliche Toxine benötigen grundsätzlich andere Dialyseformen als eiweißgebundene Substanzen und Antikörper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bachli EB, Schuepbach RA, Maggiorini M et al. (2007) Artificial liver support with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system: activation of coagulation and bleeding complications. Liver Int 27: 475–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport A (2003) Anticoagulation options for pediatric hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 7: 168-176

    Google Scholar 

  • Devuyst O, Rippe B (2014) Water transport across the peritoneal membrane. Kidney Int 85: 750–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Dheu C, Terzic J, Menouer S, Fischbach M (2009) Importance of the curve shape for interpretation of blood volume monitor changes during haemodiafiltration. Pediatr Nephrol 24: 1419–1423

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach M, Issad B, Dubois V, Taamma R (2011) The beneficial influence on the effectiveness of automated peritoneal dialysis of varying the dwell time (short/long) and fill volume (small/large): a randomized controlled trial. Perit Dial Int 31: 450–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach M, Terzic J, Laugel V et al. (2003) Measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure: a useful tool for the improvement of dialysis dose prescription. Pediatr Nephrol 18: 976–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach M, Terzic J, Menouer S et al. (2010) Daily on line haemodiafiltration promotes catch-up growth in children on chronic dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25: 867–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg A, Davenport A (2011) Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments in outpatient hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 57: 123–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary DF, Piva E, Tyrrell J et al. (2005) Home nocturnal hemodialysis in children. J Pediatr 147: 383–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes WN, Watson AR, Callaghan N et al. for the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group (2012) Vascular access: choice and complications in European paediatric haemodialysis units. Pediatr Nephrol 27: 999–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothi DK, Harvey E, Piva E et al. (2006) Calcium and phosphate balance in adolescents on home nocturnal haemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 835–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Leebmann J, Roeseler E, Julius U et al; Pro(a)LiFe Study Group (20113) Lipoprotein apheresis in patients with maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy, lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia, and progressive cardiovascular disease: prospective observational multicenter study. Circulation 128: 2567–1576

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcelli D, Usvyat LA, Kotanko P et al; MONitoring Dialysis Outcomes (MONDO) Consortium (2015) Body Composition and Survival in Dialysis Patients: Results from an International Cohort Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1192–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern BZ, Wuhl E, Nair KS, Warady BA, Schaefer F (2006) Anthropometric prediction of total body water in children who are on pediatric peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • National Kidney Foundation (2006) KDOQI clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 48 (Suppl1): S1–S322

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) 2011 Annual Report (http://www.naprtcs.org)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh J, Wunsch R, Turzer M et al. (2002) Advanced coronary and carotid arteriopathy in young adults with childhood-onset chronic renal failure. Circulation 106: 100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglialonga F, Schmitt CP, Shroff R et al. (2015) Indications, technique, and outcome of therapeutic apheresis in European pediatric nephrology units. Pediat Nephrol 30: 103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Pešić I, Müller GA, Baumann C et al. (2013) Cellulose membranes are more effective in holding back vital proteins and exhibit less interaction with plasma proteins during hemodialysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1834: 754–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippe B, Stelin G, Haraldsson B (1991) Computer simulations of peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD. Kidney Int 40: 315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren BI, Rippe B (2003) Blood flow limitation in vivo of small solute transfer during peritoneal dialysis in rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 1599–1604

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer F (2007) The PET-iatrics of peritoneal solute transport: is short also good for the young ones? Perit Dial Int 27: 413–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer F, Klaus G, Mehls O, Mid-European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group (1999) Peritoneal transport properties and dialysis dose affect growth and nutritional status in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1786–1792

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer B, Schaefer F, Engelmann G et al. (2011) Comparison of Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) dialysis with combined plasma exchange and haemodialysis in children with acute liver failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26: 3633–3639

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer B, Ujszaszi A, Schaefer S et al. (2014) Safety and efficacy of tandem hemodialysis and plasma exchange in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 1563–1570

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CP, Dötschmann R, Daschner M et al. (1999) Residual peritoneal volume and body size in children on peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 15: 287–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CP, Haraldsson B, Doetschmann R et al. (2002) Effects of pH-neutral, bicarbonate-buffered dialysis fluid on peritoneal transport kinetics in children. Kidney Int 61: 1527–1536

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CP, Zaloszyc A, Schaefer B, Fischbach M (2011) Peritoneal dialysis tailored to pediatric needs. Int J Nephrol 2011: 940267. doi: 10.4061/2011/940267

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A et al. (2013) Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice-evidence-based approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the sixth special issue. J Clin Apher 28: 145–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Shroff R, Stefanidis CJ, Askiti V et al; European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group (2013) Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in children on chronic PD: a survey from the European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28: 1908–1914

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons JM, Chua AN, Somers MJ et al. (2007) Demographic characteristics of pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy: a report of the prospective pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy registry. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 732–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumfart J, Puttkamer CV, Wagner S, Querfeld U, Müller D (2014) Hemodiafiltration in a pediatric nocturnal dialysis program. Pediatr Nephrol 29: 1411–1416

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylan C, Schlune A, Meissner T, Azukaitis K, Udink ten Kate FEA, Weber LT (2016) Disease control via intensified lipoprotein apheresis in three siblings with familiar hypercholesterolemia. Epub ahead of print, J Clin Lipidol, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2016.08.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Warady BA, Alexander SR, Hossli S et al. (1996) Peritoneal membrane transport function in children receiving long-term dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 2385–2391

    Google Scholar 

  • Warady BA, Bakkaloglu S, Newland J et al. (2012) Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update. Perit Dial Int 32 (Suppl 2): S32–S86

    Google Scholar 

  • Warady BA, Feneberg R, Verrina E et al. (2007) Peritonitis in children who receive long-term peritoneal dialysis: a prospective evaluation of therapeutic guidelines. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2172–2179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalosycz A, Fischbach M, Schaefer B et al. (2016) Body composition monitoring-derived urea distribution volume in children on chronic hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 31: 991–999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitt, C. (2017). Dialyse. In: Dötsch, J., Weber, L. (eds) Nierenerkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48789-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48789-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48788-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48789-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics