Skip to main content

Abstract

There are a lot of methods and instruments trying to assess mental workload reliable and independent from specific use cases or situations. Each method has its own strengths and weaknesses depending on the situation and the on individual person. Attempting to improve each approach separately would indeed allow a further context of use, but do not lead to a global reliability growth. Within this work a new approach is suggested by combining various ocular parameters adapting the individual person. The results of this study show clearly the advantages in mental workload assessment of an individual adapted set of variables in contrast to one variable trying to fit a collectivity of people. This new preparation considering six physiological ocular variables in two different contexts of use can be one step further to a more reliable and global way to assess mental workload.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abe T, Nonomura T, Komada Y, Asoaka S, Sasai T, Ueno A, Inoue Y (2011) Detecting deteriorated vigilance using percentage of eyelid closure time during behavioural maintenance of wakefulness tests. Int J Psychophysiol 82:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Backs R, Walrath L (1992) Eye movement and pupillary response indices of mental workload during visual search of symbolic displays. Appl Ergon 23:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beatty J, Lucero-Wagoner B (2000) The Pupillary System. In: Cacioppo J, Tassinary L, Berntson G (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology. University Press, Cambridge, pp 142–162

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benedetto S, Pedrotty M, Minin L, Baccino T, Re A, Montanari R (2011) Driver workload and eye blink duration. Transp Res F 14:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berteau-Pavy D, Raber J, Piper B (2011) Contributions of age, but not sex, to mental rotation performance in a community sample. PEBL Tech Rep Ser 11(2)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brookhuis K, de Waard D (2010) Monitoring drivers’ mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accid Anal Prev 42:898–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardona G, Quevedo N (2014) Blinking and driving: the influence of saccades and cognitive workload. Curr Eye Res 39:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Demberg V (2013) Pupillometry: the index of cognitive activity in a dual-task study. In: Knauff M, Pauen M, Sebanz N, Wachsmuth I (eds) Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Austin TX, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Nocera F, Camilli F, Terenzi M (2007) A random glance on the flight deck: pilots’ scanning strategies and the real-time assessment of mental workload. J Cogn Eng Decis Making 1(3):271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donoho D (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41:613–627

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Donoho D, Johnstone I (1995) Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J Am Stat Assoc 90:1200–1224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gagnon J, Durantin G, Vachon F, Causse M, Tremblay S, Dehais F (2012) Anticipating human error before it happens: towards a psychophysiological modal for online prediction of mental workload. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 2012, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gawron V (2008) Human performance, workload, and situational awareness measures handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Gopher D, Donchin E (1986) Workload – an examination of the concept. In: Schieber F (ed) Handbook of perception and human performance. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halverson T, Estepp J, Christensen J, Monnin J (2012) Classifying workload with eye movements in a complex task. Proceedings of the human factors an ergonomics society annual meeting, 58, pp 168–172

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hart S, Staveland L (1988) Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P, Meshkanti N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 139–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentence-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman D, Beatty J (1967) Pupillary responses in a pitch-discrimination task. Percept Psychophys 2:101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kane M, Conway A, Miura T, Colfesh G (2007) Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: a question of construct validity. J Exp Psychol 33:615–622

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loewenfeld I (1993) The Pupil: anatomy, physiology and clinical applications, 1. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Manzey D (1998) Psychophysiologie mentaler Beanspruchung. In: Rösler F (ed) Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Hofgrefe, Göttingen, pp 799–864

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall S (2000) Patentnumber. 6,090,051. USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall S (2002) The index of cognitive activity: measuring cognitive workload. IEEE Human Factors Meeting, 7, Scottsdale

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marshall S (2007) Indentifying cognitive state from eye metrics. Aviat Space Environ Med 78:165–175

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall S, Pleydell-Pearce C, Dickson B (2003) Integrating psychophysiological measures of cognitive workload and eye-movements to detect strategy shifts. Proceedings of the international conference on system science, 36, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martins R, Carvalho J (2015) Eye blinking as an indicator of fatigue and mental load – a systematic review. In: Arezes P et al (eds) Occupational safety and hygiene III. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 237–259

    Google Scholar 

  27. Matthews G, Campbell S (1998) Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 42nd annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  28. Misiti M, Misiti Y, Oppenheim G, Poggi J (1996) Wavelet toolbox user’s guide. The MathWorks Inc., Natick

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parasuraman R, Rizzo M (2007) Neuroergonomics: the brain at work. University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robert G, Hockey J (1997) Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive – energetical framework. Biol Psychol 45:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rubio S, Díaz E, Martín J, Puente J (2004) Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods. Appl Psychol Int Rev 53:61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sardy S (2000) Minimax threshold for denoising complex signals with waveshrink. IEEE Trans Signal Process 48:102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Schleicher R, Galley S, Briest S, Galley L (2008) Blinks and saccades as indicators of fatigue in sleepiness warners: looking tired? Ergonomics 3:2–29

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schubert P, Kirchner M (2014) Ellipse area calculations and their applicability in posturography. Gait Posture 39:518–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwalm M (2009) Pupillometrie als Methode zur Erfassung mentaler Beanspruchungen im automotive Kontext. Doctoral dissertation, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  36. Steinhauer S, Siegle G, Condray R, Pless M (2004) Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. Int J Psychophysiol 52:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Straeter O (2005) Cognition and safety: an integrated approach to systems design and assessment. Ashgate, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  38. Watling C, Smith S (2013) In the blink of an eye: the circadian effects on ocular and subjective indices of driver sleepiness. In: Australasian road safety research, policing & education conference, 28–30. Brisbane, QLD

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wickens C (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 3(2):159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wickens C, Hollands J, Parasuraman R, Banbury S (2012) Engineering psychology & human performance. Pearson, München

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson G (2002) An analysis of mental workload in pilots during flight using multiple psychophysiological measures. Int J Aviat Psychol 12(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was conducted within the BMBF project AMIKA (Development of an adaptive and multi-modal interface for complex automation systems).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Schneider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schneider, M., Deml, B. (2016). An Integrated Approach of Mental Workload Assessment. In: Deml, B., Stock, P., Bruder, R., Schlick, C.M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48661-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48661-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48659-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48661-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics