Analysis on the EMMS Theory

  • Cheng ChenEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


In order to develop an accurate Energy Minimum Multiscale (EMMS) drag model, it is necessary to clarify the effects of mesoscale structure on drag force and identify the key parameter that are decisive to drag. This chapter aims to give the research results of this aspect in three sections.


Cluster Size Drag Reduction Solid Concentration Cluster Density Drag Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Li F (2009) Investigations on the turbulent gas–solid two-phase interactions in fluidized desulfurization process. Doctoral dissertation, Tsinghua University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li F, Chen C, Wang J, Qi H (2011) QL-EMMS drag model and its revision for fluidized dense gas–solid two-phase flow. J Eng Thermophys 1:75–79Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li J (1987) Multiscale model for two-phase flow and energy minimum method. Doctoral, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsen JM (1982) Mechanisms of choking and entrainment. Powder Technol 32(1):21–33MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li JH, Cheng C, Zhang Z et al (1999) The EMMS model-its application, development and updated concepts. Chem Eng Sci 54(22):5409–5425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu GW, Li JH (1998) Analytical solution of the energy-minimization multi-scale model for gas–solid two-phase flow. Chem Eng Sci 53(7):1349–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang W, Li JH (2007) Simulation of gas–solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach—extension of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level. Chem Eng Sci 62(1–2):208–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bin Zou, Hongzhong Li, Yashen Xia, Kwauk Mooson (1993) Statistic model for cluster size distribution in fast fluidized bed. Eng Chem Metall 14(1):36–42Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gu WK, Chen JC (1998) A model for solid concentration in circulating fluidized beds. In: Fluidization IX, Durango, Colorado, 1998, pp 501–508Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gu WK (1999) Diameter of catalyst clusters in FCC. AIChE Symp Ser 95(321):42–47Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris AT, Davidson JF, Thorpe RB (2002) The prediction of particle cluster properties in the near wall region of a vertical riser. Powder Technol 127(2):128–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Subbarao D (2010) A model for cluster size in risers. Powder Technol 199(1):48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qi HY (1997) Euler/Euler Simulation der Fluiddynamik Zirkulierender Wirbelschichten. Aachen, Germany: Verlag Mainz, Wissenschaftsverlag. ISBN 3-89653-224-3Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horio M, Kuroki H (1994) Three-dimensional flow visualization of dilute dispersed solids in bubbling and circulating fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 49(15):2413–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Brien TJ, Syamlal M (1993) Particle cluster effects in the numerical simulation of a circulating fluidized bed. In: Avidan AA (ed) Preprint volume for CFB-IV. AIChE, New York, pp 430–435Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naren PR, Lali AM, Ranade VV (2007) Evaluating EMMS model for simulating high solid flux risers. Chem Eng Res Des 85(A8):1188–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manyele SV, Parssinen JH, Zhu JX (2002) Characterizing particle aggregates in a high-density and high-flux CFB riser. Chem Eng J 88(1–3):151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang TY, Leu LP (2009) Multiresolution analysis on identification and dynamics of clusters in a circulating fluidized bed. AIChE J 55(3):612–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations