Investigations on Mesoscale Structure in Gas–Solid Fluidization and Heterogeneous Drag Model pp 33-53 | Cite as
Analysis on the EMMS Theory
Chapter
First Online:
- 378 Downloads
Abstract
In order to develop an accurate Energy Minimum Multiscale (EMMS) drag model, it is necessary to clarify the effects of mesoscale structure on drag force and identify the key parameter that are decisive to drag. This chapter aims to give the research results of this aspect in three sections.
Keywords
Cluster Size Drag Reduction Solid Concentration Cluster Density Drag Model
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
- 1.Li F (2009) Investigations on the turbulent gas–solid two-phase interactions in fluidized desulfurization process. Doctoral dissertation, Tsinghua University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 2.Li F, Chen C, Wang J, Qi H (2011) QL-EMMS drag model and its revision for fluidized dense gas–solid two-phase flow. J Eng Thermophys 1:75–79Google Scholar
- 3.Li J (1987) Multiscale model for two-phase flow and energy minimum method. Doctoral, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 4.Matsen JM (1982) Mechanisms of choking and entrainment. Powder Technol 32(1):21–33MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Li JH, Cheng C, Zhang Z et al (1999) The EMMS model-its application, development and updated concepts. Chem Eng Sci 54(22):5409–5425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Xu GW, Li JH (1998) Analytical solution of the energy-minimization multi-scale model for gas–solid two-phase flow. Chem Eng Sci 53(7):1349–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wang W, Li JH (2007) Simulation of gas–solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach—extension of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level. Chem Eng Sci 62(1–2):208–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bin Zou, Hongzhong Li, Yashen Xia, Kwauk Mooson (1993) Statistic model for cluster size distribution in fast fluidized bed. Eng Chem Metall 14(1):36–42Google Scholar
- 9.Gu WK, Chen JC (1998) A model for solid concentration in circulating fluidized beds. In: Fluidization IX, Durango, Colorado, 1998, pp 501–508Google Scholar
- 10.Gu WK (1999) Diameter of catalyst clusters in FCC. AIChE Symp Ser 95(321):42–47Google Scholar
- 11.Harris AT, Davidson JF, Thorpe RB (2002) The prediction of particle cluster properties in the near wall region of a vertical riser. Powder Technol 127(2):128–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Subbarao D (2010) A model for cluster size in risers. Powder Technol 199(1):48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Qi HY (1997) Euler/Euler Simulation der Fluiddynamik Zirkulierender Wirbelschichten. Aachen, Germany: Verlag Mainz, Wissenschaftsverlag. ISBN 3-89653-224-3Google Scholar
- 14.Horio M, Kuroki H (1994) Three-dimensional flow visualization of dilute dispersed solids in bubbling and circulating fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 49(15):2413–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.O’Brien TJ, Syamlal M (1993) Particle cluster effects in the numerical simulation of a circulating fluidized bed. In: Avidan AA (ed) Preprint volume for CFB-IV. AIChE, New York, pp 430–435Google Scholar
- 16.Naren PR, Lali AM, Ranade VV (2007) Evaluating EMMS model for simulating high solid flux risers. Chem Eng Res Des 85(A8):1188–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Manyele SV, Parssinen JH, Zhu JX (2002) Characterizing particle aggregates in a high-density and high-flux CFB riser. Chem Eng J 88(1–3):151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Yang TY, Leu LP (2009) Multiresolution analysis on identification and dynamics of clusters in a circulating fluidized bed. AIChE J 55(3):612–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016