Skip to main content

Land-Use-Oriented Conservation of Ecosystem Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1697 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

Ecosystem services suffer from both the human intervention, such as land-use zoning change, and the natural intervention, such as climate change. In this chapter, we first conducted land-use zoning for conserving ecosystem services in the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin (HRB). Under the background of climate change, regulation services of ecosystem could be strengthened under proper land-use zoning policy to mitigate climate change. We conducted a case study in the middle reaches of the HRB to assess the ecosystem service conservation zoning under the change of land use associated with climate variations. The results show the spatial impact of land-use zoning on ecosystem services in the study area which are significant reference for the spatial optimization of land-use zoning in preserving the key ecosystem services to mitigate climate change. The research contributes to the growing literature in finely characterizing the ecosystem service zones altered by land-use change to alleviate the impact of climate change, as there is no such systematic ecosystem zoning method before. Further, we introduced ecosystem-based adaptation measures for climate change in Qinghai Province. The change of land surface can exert significant influence on the future climate change. We analyzed the effects of herdsmen’s adaptation to climate change on the livestock breeding, income, and land surface dynamics with a land surface parameterization scheme. The empirical analysis was first carried out on the impacts of the adaptation measures of herdsmen on their income in the context of the climate change with the positive mathematical programming (PMP) model on the basis of the household survey data in the Three-River Source Region, an ecologically fragile area in Qinghai Province, China. Then, the land surface parameterization process is analyzed based on the agent-based model (ABM), which involves the herdsmen’s adaptation measures on climate change, and it also provides reference for the land surface change projection. The result shows that the climate change adaptation measures will have a positive effect on increasing the amount of herdsman’s livestock and income as well as future land surface dynamics. Some suggestions on the land-use management were finally proposed, which can provide significant reference information for the land-use planning. Finally, we introduced how to build resilience to climate change for conserving ecosystem servers. The ecosystem resilience plays a key role in maintaining a steady flow of ecosystem services and enables quick and flexible responses to climate change, and maintaining or restoring the ecosystem resilience of forests is a necessary societal adaptation to climate change; however, there is a great lack of spatially explicit ecosystem resilience assessments. Drawing on principles of the ecosystem resilience highlighted in the literature, we built on the theory of dissipative structures to develop a conceptual model of the ecosystem resilience of forests. A hierarchical indicator system was designed with the influencing factors of the forest ecosystem resilience, including the stand conditions and the ecological memory, which were further disaggregated into specific indicators. Furthermore, indicator weights were determined with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the coefficient of variation method. Based on the remote sensing data, forest inventory data, so forth, the resilience index of forests was calculated. The result suggests that there is a significant spatial heterogeneity of the ecosystem resilience of forests, indicating it is feasible to generate large-scale ecosystem resilience maps with this assessment model, and the results can provide a scientific basis for the conservation of forests, which is of great significance to the climate change mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93(3–4):335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev Stud 3(3):179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batisse M (1985) Action plan for biosphere reserves. Environ Conserv 12(01):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Hoey AS, Choat JH (2003) Limited functional redundancy in high diversity systems: resilience and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Ecol Lett 6(4):281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. AMBIO J Hum Environ 32(6):389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E, Cumming G, Peterson G (2005) A systems model approach to determining resilience surrogates for case studies. Ecosystems 8(8):945–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Jolly D (2002) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conserv Ecol 5(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Bricker SB, Dauer DM, Demetriades NT, Ferreira JG, Forbes AT, Hutchings P, Jia X, Kenchington R, Marques JC (2008) Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Mar Pollut Bull 56(9):1519–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bounoua L, DeFries R, Collatz GJ, Sellers P, Khan H (2002) Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Clim Change 52(1–2):29–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand F (2009) Critical natural capital revisited: ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecol Econ 68(3):605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Muller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Ind 21:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Press M, Huntly N, Levin S (2001) Alternate states of ecosystems: evidence and some implications. In: Ecology: achievement and challenge: the 41st symposium of the British ecological society sponsored by the ecological society of America held at Orlando, Florida, USA, 10–13 April 2000, Blackwell Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001b) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2012) Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 45:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D (1997). Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Ecological Society of America, Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin K, Dellink R, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, van Buuren A, Graveland J, De Groot R, Kuikman P, Reinhard S, Roetter R (2009) Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Change 95(1–2):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehring CA, Lind MS (2007) Residential land-use controls and land values: zoning and covenant interactions. Land Econ 83(4):445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Huang J, Huang Q, Rozelle S, Gibson J (2011a) Do roads lead to grassland degradation or restoration? A case study in Inner Mongolia, China. Environ Dev Econ 16(06):751–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Huang J, Uchida E, Rozelle S, Gibson J (2011b) Pressure cookers or pressure valves: do roads lead to deforestation in China? J Environ Econ Manage 61(1):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Jiang QO, Su H, Wu F (2010a) Trace forest conversions in Northeast China with a 1-km area percentage data model. J Appl Remote Sens 4(1):041893–041893–041813

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Li Z, Huang J, Shi Q, Li Y (2013a) A revisit to the impacts of land use changes on the human wellbeing via altering the ecosystem provisioning services. Adv Meteorol 2013:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Zhao C, Yan H (2013) Systematic modeling of impacts of land use and land cover changes on regional climate: a review. Adv Meteorology 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Yin F, Uchida E, Rozelle S (2010b) A complementary measurement of changes in China’s forestry area using remote sensing data. IJLS 3:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong S, Zhou C, Wang H (2002) Ecological crisis and countermeasures of the Three Rivers Headstream Regions. J Nat Res 17(6):713–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Dublin HT, Sinclair AR, McGlade J (1990) Elephants and fire as causes of multiple stable states in the Serengeti-Mara woodlands. J Anim Ecol 1147–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81(6):1667–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein H, Sousa R (2007) Warning systems for natural threats. Georisk 1(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Q, Zhang L, Hong H, Zhang L, Bristow F (2008) Ecological function zoning for environmental planning at different levels. Environ Dev Sustain 10(1):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddema JJ, Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Mearns LO, Buja LE, Meehl GA, Washington WM (2005) The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science 310(5754):1674–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fezzi C, Bateman I, Askew T, Munday P, Pascual U, Sen A, Harwood A (2014) Valuing provisioning ecosystem services in agriculture: the impact of climate change on food production in the United Kingdom. Environ Res Econ 57(2):197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 31(5):437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, MacMahon JA (2000) Messages from a mountain. Science 288(5469):1183–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16(3):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs MT (2009) Resilience: what is it and what does it mean for marine policymakers? Marine Policy 33(2):322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies C, Pierce R (1999) Secondary poisoning of mammalian predators during possum and rodent control operations at Trounson Kauri Park, Northland, New Zealand. New Zealand J Ecology 23(2):183–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling SN (2013) The likelihood and potential impact of future change in the large-scale climate-earth system on ecosystem services. Environ Sci Policy 27, Supplement 1(0):S15–S31

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckelei T, Britz W, Zhang Y (2012) Positive mathematical programming approaches–recent developments in literature and applied modelling. Bio-based Appl Econ 1(1):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Howitt RE (1995) Positive mathematical programming. Am J Agric Econ 77(2):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (1995) Stochastic space-time weather models from ground-based data. Agric For Meteorol 73(3–4):237–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Agenda 6(07):338

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo LR, Gotts NM, Polhill JG (2004) Case-based reasoning, social dilemmas, and a new equilibrium concept. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 7(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C, White PS (2002) Scale, the dynamic stability of forest ecosystems, and the persistence of biodiversity. Silva Fennica 36(1):393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan SJ, Hayes SE, Yoskowitz D, Smith LM, Summers JK, Russell M, Benson WH (2010) Accounting for natural resources and environmental sustainability: linking ecosystem services to human well-being. Environ Sci Technol 44(5):1530–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47(4):325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak AB, Zeb A, Bibi N (2008) Impact of germination time and type of illumination on carotenoidcontent, protein solubility and in vitro protein digestibility of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) sprouts. Food Chem 109(4):797–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu M, Zhuang D, Zhang Z, Deng X (2003) Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 46(4):373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Zhang Z, Xu X, Kuang W, Zhou W, Zhang S, Li R, Yan C, Yu D, Wu S, Jiang N (2010) Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. J Geog Sci 20(4):483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319(5863):607–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R (1955) Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36(3):533–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TJ, Ogden J (2002) The seed ecology of Ascarina lucida: a rare New Zealand tree adapted to disturbance. NZ J Bot 40(3):397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JC, De Ruiter PC, Hunt HW (1993) Influence of productivity on the stability of real and model ecosystems. Sc New York Washington 261:906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols G, Prigogine I (1989) Exploring complexity: an introduction. WH Freeman [PJ]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyström M, Folke C (2001) Spatial resilience of coral reefs. Ecosystems 4(5):406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polhill JG, Sutherland L-A, Gotts NM (2010) Using qualitative evidence to enhance an agent-based modelling system for studying land use change. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 13(2):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Prato T (2012) Increasing resilience of natural protected areas to future climate change: a fuzzy adaptive management approach. Ecol Model 242:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price DT, McKenney DW, Nalder IA, Hutchinson MF, Kesteven JL (2000) A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data. Agric For Meteorol 101(2–3):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney RC, Bayley SE (2010) Quantifying a stress gradient: an objective approach to variable selection, standardization and weighting in ecosystem assessment. Ecol Ind 10(6):1174–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset V, Oertli B (2011) Freshwater biodiversity under climate warming pressure: identifying the winners and losers in temperate standing waterbodies. Biol Conserv 144(9):2311–2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands G, Purkis S, Riegl B, Metsamaa L, Bruckner A, Renaud P (2012) Satellite imaging coral reef resilience at regional scale. A case-study from Saudi Arabia. Mar Pollut Bull 64(6):1222–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough VL, Burnside WR (2010) Complexity and sustainability: perspectives from the ancient Maya and the modern Balinese. Am Antiq 75(2):327–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ (2000) Combining field experiments and individual-based modeling to identify the dynamically relevant organizational scale in a field system. Oikos 89(3):471–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw MR, Pendleton L, Cameron DR, Morris B, Bachelet D, Klausmeyer K, MacKenzie J, Conklin D, Bratman G, Lenihan J, Haunreiter E, Daly C, Roehrdanz P (2011) The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services. Clim Change 109(1):465–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Q, Zhan J, Wu F, Deng X, Xu L (2012) Simulation on water flow and water quality in Wuliangsuhai Lake using a 2-D hydrodynamic model. J Food Agric Environ 10(2):973–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Shitikov VK, Vykhristyuk LA, Pautova VN, Zinchenko TD (2007) Comprehensive ecological zoning of the Kuibyshev Reservoir. Water Resour 34(4):450–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha MK, York AM, Boone CG, Zhang S (2012) Land fragmentation due to rapid urbanization in the phoenix metropolitan area: analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers. Appl Geogr 32(2):522–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Burton I, Klein RJ, Wandel J (2000) An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim Change 45(1):223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. Sustain Dev 8(9):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Skinner MW (2002) Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 7(1):85–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithers J, Smit B (1997) Human adaptation to climatic variability and change. Glob Environ Change 7(2):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland-Munro JK, Allison HE, Moore SA (2010) Using resilience concepts to investigate the impacts of protected area tourism on communities. Ann Tourism Res 37(2):499–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. In: A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, Montreal. Technical Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 6(1):18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Zhang X, Yan X (2013) Modeling the climatic effects of urbanization in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan area. Theoret Appl Climatol 113(3–4):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S-H, Huang S-L, Budd WW (2012) Integrated ecosystem model for simulating land use allocation. Ecol Model 227:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe MDB, Ortega E (2014) Dynamic emergy accounting of water and carbon ecosystem services: a model to simulate the impacts of land-use change. Ecol Model 271:113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD, Wade TG, Riitters KH (2013) Empirical analysis of the influence of forest extent on annual and seasonal surface temperatures for the continental United States. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22(5):620–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfslehner B, Vacik H, Lexer MJ (2005) Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manage 207(1):157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Zhan J, Yan H, Shi C, Huang J (2013) Land cover mapping based on multisource spatial data mining approach for climate simulation: a case study in the farming-pastoral ecotone of North China. Adv Meteorol 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye J, Yang X, Jiang D (2010) The grid scale effect analysis on town leveled population statistical data spatialization. J Geo-Inf Sci 12(1):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan J, Shi N, He S, Lin Y (2010) Factors and mechanism driving the land-use conversion in Jiangxi Province. J Geog Sci 20(4):525–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou K, Huang J, Deng X, van der Werf W, Zhang W, Lu Y, Wu K, Wu F (2014) Effects of land use and insecticides on natural enemies of aphids in cotton: first evidence from smallholder agriculture in the North China Plain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirlewagen D, Raben G, Weise M (2007) Zoning of forest health conditions based on a set of soil, topographic and vegetation parameters. For Ecol Manage 248(1):43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyan Zhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhan, J., Yan, H., Shi, C., Liu, Y., Wu, F., Wang, G. (2015). Land-Use-Oriented Conservation of Ecosystem Services. In: Zhan, J. (eds) Impacts of Land-use Change on Ecosystem Services. Springer Geography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48008-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics