Skip to main content

Should Germany Be a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council? On the Efforts to Reform the United Nations

  • Chapter
  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

In 2005, to mark the 60th anniversary of the foundation of the United Nations, a concerted attempt was made to expand the UN Security Council, in which Germany has expressed its interest for over a decade. This attempt failed, and is highly unlikely to be successful in the near future. There is consensus only with regard to the fact that the number of members of the Security Council should be increased and the geographical distribution of the seats should be made more representative. There was already widespread agreement that India, Japan, Germany, Brazil and two African states should be accepted as permanent members of the Security Council, while three or four additional states should become non-permanent members. However, it remained unclear which African states should be given preference (South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt), and above all, whether and when the new permanent Security Council members should be given the right of veto, or even whether the old members should relinquish or limit their right of veto.

All governing parties of the united Germany are in favour of Germany being granted a permanent seat in the UN Security Council, without having or seeking much support for such a move among the population. However, observers from the academic and public spheres see this as being a re-nationalisation of German global policy, while others are in favour of a reduction to a single “European” seat in the Security Council.

Since any revision of the Charter is an extremely difficult task, the UN system has to date adapted in part to the new challenges primarily through a dynamic interpretation of the Charter and the foundation of numerous new sub-organs, separate organs and separate organisations. Here, there is also an opportunity for promising reform efforts in the foreseeable future. The legitimacy of decisions made by the Security Council can be considerably strengthened by creating new auxiliary organs in accordance with Art. 29, through more extensive recourse to regional agreements and organs in accordance with Articles 52 and 53, and through the stronger involvement of the General Assembly in accordance with Articles 10–12 of the UN Charter, as a result of which non-members of the Security Council can also be involved in its decision-making process. In a sub-organ of the Security Council for peacekeeping and peacebuilding operations, both the main funders and the states which provide the troops, police and civilian personnel can be granted rights to participate in the preparation of peace missions by the Security Council. As a global economic power, Germany has numerous unexploited opportunities to bring its great influence to bear on the policies of the UN, prevent and eliminate threats to freedom and thwart breaches of the peace and acts of aggression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the reforms of the UN Security Council see Schmitt (2013), Rittberger and Baumgärtner (2006), Pleuger (2012).

  2. 2.

    Resolution A/Res/48/26 of 3 December 1993 on the establishment of an “Open-ended Working Group to Consider all Aspects of the Question of Increase in the Membership of the Security Council, and Other Matters Related to the Security Council”, http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r026.htm.

  3. 3.

    Art. 108 of the UN Charter, cf. Simma et al. (2012).

  4. 4.

    Gareis (2006).

  5. 5.

    Thus in 1997, the president of the General Assembly, Ismail Razali, presented a proposal to establish five new permanent seats without the right of veto, and four non-permanent seats, cf. Fröhlich et al. (2005, p. 11).

  6. 6.

    In July 2005, there was informally almost a two-thirds majority in the UN General Assembly in favour of the reform proposals by the G 4 (Japan, Germany, India, Brazil) for an extension of the UN Security Council to 25 members (6 new permanent seats, of which two were to go to African states, initially without a right of veto, and 4 new non-permanent members from Latin America, Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe).

  7. 7.

    Samuel Huntington for example proposed that Japan, India, Africa, Latin America and the European Union should receive a permanent seat, which should be occupied according to the rotation principle. Great Britain and France should lose their seat, so that the Security Council would have nine permanent members (Huntington 2011, p. 317).

  8. 8.

    On the relationship between representation and efficiency see Müller (2006).

  9. 9.

    On the history of the League of Nations see Rittberger et al. (2013), Unser (2004, pp. 1–18), United Nations Library at Geneva, League of Nations Archives (1996), Northedge (1986), Pfeil (1976), Gill (1996).

  10. 10.

    On the history of the United Nations see Volger (2008), Gareis and Varwick (2012, 2014), Weiss and Daws (2007), von Schorlemer (2012, pp. 683–693).

  11. 11.

    To this extent, the annexation of Crimea by Russia in March 2014 is a grave breach of taboo in international politics since the end of the Second World War, the consequences of which cannot yet be foreseen.

  12. 12.

    On the development of types of peacekeeping operations see Blume (2011), MacQueen (2006), Journal of International Peacekeeping. Leiden: Nijhoff.

  13. 13.

    On the UN concept of peacebuilding see Mac Ginty (2013), Doyle and Sambanis (2006), Haupel (2005).

  14. 14.

    On the concept of the responsibility to protect see Gareis and Geiger (2009), Fröhlich (2006), Bellamy (2009).

  15. 15.

    Zum Versagen of the UN in Rwanda see Lanotte (2007), Dallaire (2005), Harding (1998).

  16. 16.

    Bosco (2014), Mendes (2010), Beigbeder (2011), Deitelhoff (2009).

  17. 17.

    The journals Vereinte Nationen and Friedenswarte are important channels in this debate.

References

  • Beigbeder Y (2011) International criminal tribunals. Justice and politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy AJ (2009) Responsibility to protect. The global effect to end mass atrocities. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume T (2011) Framing peace. Public information and security in UN peace operations. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco DL (2014) Rough justice. The international criminal court’s battle to fix the world. One prosecution at a time. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallaire RA (2005) Shake hands with the devil. The failure of humanity in Rwanda. Carroll & Graf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff N (2009) Isolated Hegemon. The creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC). In: Brem S, Stiles K (eds) Cooperating without America. Theories and case studies of non-hegemonic regimes. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MW, Sambanis N (2006) Making war and building peace. United Nations peace operations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich M (2006) ‘Responsibility to protect’—Zur Herausbildung einer neuen Norm der Sicherheit. In: Varwick J, Zimmermann A (eds) Die Reform der Vereinten Nationen. Duncker und Humblodt, Berlin, pp 167–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich M, Hüfner K, Märker A (2005) Reform des UN-Sicherheitsrats. Modelle, Kriterien und Kennziffern. Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen, Berlin. http://www.dgvn.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PUBLIKATIONEN/Blaue_Reihe/Blaue_Reihe_94__Schlussfassung_.pdf

  • Gareis S-B (2006) Reform vertagt. Deutschland muß weiter auf einen ständigen Sitz im UN-Sicherheitsrat warten. Vereinte Nationen 54(4):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gareis SB, Geiger G (eds) (2009) Internationaler Schutz der Menschenrechte. Stand und Perspektiven im 21. Jahrhundert. Barbara Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gareis SB, Varwick J (2012) The United Nations. An introduction. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Gareis SB, Varwick J (2014) Die Vereinten Nationen. Aufgaben, Instrumente und Reformen. Barbara Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill G (1996) The league of nations: from 1929 to 1946. Avery, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding L (ed) (1998) Ruanda - der Weg zum Völkermord. Vorgeschichte – Verlauf – Deutung. LIT, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupel M (2005) Friedenskonsolidierung im Zeitalter der ‘neuen Kriege’. Der Wandel der Gewaltökonomien als Herausforderung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP (2011) The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanotte O (2007) La France au Rwanda (1990-1994). Entre abstention impossible et engagement ambivalent. Lang, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty R (ed) (2013) The Routledge handbook of peacebuilding. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen N (2006) Peacekeeping and the international system. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes EP (2010) Peace and justice at the international criminal court. A court of Last Resort. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J (ed) (2006) Reforming the United Nations. The struggle for legitimacy and effectiveness. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Northedge F (1986) The league of nations. Its life and time, 1920-1946. Holmes & Meier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeil A (1976) Der Völkerbund. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleuger G (2012) Die Reform des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen. In: von Schorlemer S (ed) 2012: Praxishandbuch UNO: Die Vereinten Nationen im Lichte globaler Herausforderungen. Springer, Berlin, pp. 683–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger V, Baumgärtner H (2006) Die Reform des Sicherheitsrats – Stand und Perspektiven. In: Varwick J, Zimmermann A (eds) Die Reform der Vereinten Nationen. Duncker und Humblodt, Berlin, pp. 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger V, Zangl B, Kruck A (2013) Internationale Organisationen. Wiesbaden, Springer VS, pp. 49–81

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt EM (2013) Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Reform des UN-Sicherheitsrats. Vereinte Nationen 61(5):202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Simma B et al (eds) (2012) The charter of the United Nations. A commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Library at Geneva, League of Nations Archives (1996) The League of Nations 1920-1946. Organization and accomplishments. A retrospective of the first international organization for the establishment of world peace. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Unser G (2004) Die UNO. Aufgaben, Strukturen, Politik. C. H. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Volger H (2008) Geschichte der Vereinten Nationen. Oldenbourg, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schorlemer S (ed) (2012) Praxishandbuch UNO: Die Vereinten Nationen im Lichte globaler Herausforderungen. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss TG, Daws S (eds) (2007) The Oxford handbook on the United Nations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, E. (2015). Should Germany Be a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council? On the Efforts to Reform the United Nations. In: German Domestic and Foreign Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47929-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics