Skip to main content

From the West European Commemoration of Auschwitz to a Pan-European Commemoration of Auschwitz and the GULag Archipelago: An Inevitable Consequence of the Eastward Extension of the EU for Commemoration Policies

  • Chapter
German Domestic and Foreign Policy
  • 485 Accesses

Abstract

The numerous motives for the inter-state unification of western Europe after the Second World War included in particular the desire in relation to peace and security policy to end at all costs the age of wars between the nation states in Europe and the aggressive, intolerant nationalism, and to prevent a Third World War. For this reason, a closely associated European community of states was to be created in democratic, market economy-oriented western Europe. It was to remain open to all European states, particularly also those in the east, as soon as they had liberated themselves from communist rule.

The state-institutional integration in western Europe was to be underpinned by close economic and social integration and the encouragement through education of reconciliation between peoples, initially above all between Germans and French, and towards a European common consciousness. During the Cold War, the motivation to avoid war was supplemented by the motivation of anti-totalitarianism, in particular, anti-Nazism. It was not until the 1960s that the policy of mass murder of the Jews and other groups entered the general consciousness of the people as a particular characteristic of National Socialism. At the same time, policies relating to history, remembrance, memorials and commemoration were given greater significance and thus occasionally became the subject of dispute.

The murder of the Jews has officially been commemorated in Israel since 1959. In Germany, in 1996, 27 January became a national memorial day “for the victims of National Socialism”. The condemnation of the murder of the Jews and of policies of violence in general became a core element of the political identity of the Federal Republic of Germany and also of the European Union. In 2005, the United Nations declared this day a Holocaust memorial day.

The acceptance of post-communist countries into the EU brought with it demands to also commemorate the victims of the communist mass murders on an equal basis with those perpetrated under National Socialism. Finally, in April 2009, the European Parliament set 23 August as a memorial day for the victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. In this regard, a heated dispute broke out over the equal weight given to National Socialist and communist rule and of both mass murders. Conversely, it is certainly possible that the commemoration of the genocide of the Jews and Sinti and Roma can be linked as a historically singular, exterministic event to the commemoration of other wide-ranging acts of genocide and mass murder, since the commemoration of the murder of the Jews is also intended to guard against future genocide and mass murder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    François et al (2013), Becker (2013), Schmid (2009), Kühberger and Sedmak (2009).

  2. 2.

    “The debates that ensued after 1989 … also open up a problem area that had previously been neglected in the east and in the west for political and ideological reasons: the legal, moral and political context in which communism came to power following the overthrow of National Socialism” (Judt 1998).

  3. 3.

    Michael Stürmer wrote during the historians’ dispute “that in a faceless country, those who fill memory, coin the terms and interpret the past win the future” (Stürmer 1987, p. 36).

  4. 4.

    On the 50th anniversary of the pact, the Baltic people’s fronts organised a human chain from Tallinn to Vilnius (600 km) in which around two million people took part. This was an important step towards re-obtaining state independence.

  5. 5.

    Backes et al. (2009, p. 13); see also Geyer and Fitzpatrick (2009), Luks (2007), Jesse (1999).

  6. 6.

    Decision by the European Parliament on 2 April 2009 on the conscience of Europe and on totalitarianism, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2009-0213+0+DOC+XML+V0//DE. (All websites retrieved on 9.3.2015)

  7. 7.

    Declaration by the European Ministers of Education (18 October 2002), http://www.coe.int/t/e/cultural_co-operation/education/remembrance/Declaration.asp. In Germany, this was specified as being 27 January; see also Kübler (2012).

  8. 8.

    United Nations A/RES/60/7: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 1 November 2005, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/60/7.

  9. 9.

    Uhl (2009).

  10. 10.

    Bauer (2009).

  11. 11.

    See the contributions in Sapper and Weichsel (2008, 2009).

  12. 12.

    Koerfer (2009).

  13. 13.

    Birthler et al. (2009).

  14. 14.

    Rürup (2014), Eckel and Moisel (2008).

  15. 15.

    Thus for example in Ukraine, see Jilge (2008).

  16. 16.

    See the lecture “Commemoration of genocide as a contemporary political weapon. The example of the Ottoman genocide of the Armenians” in Jahn (2015).

  17. 17.

    I developed this term during the controversy surrounding the German historians’ dispute on the comparability of National Socialist and communist mass annihilation, see Jahn (1990, 2005).

  18. 18.

    Rummel (1994).

  19. 19.

    Schlögel (2008).

  20. 20.

    Schmid (2008).

  21. 21.

    On the questionable nature of linking the commemoration of the National Socialist and Ittihad acts of genocide, see Robel (2013).

  22. 22.

    See also Schönhoven (2007).

References

  • Backes U, Jaskułowski T, Polese A (eds) (2009) Totalitarismus und Transformation. Defizite der Demokratiekonsolidierung im Mittel- und Osteuropa. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer Y (2009) On comparisons between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. http://www.gedenkdienst.or.at/index.php?id=585

  • Becker M (2013) Geschichtspolitik in der‚ Berliner Republik’. Konzeptionen und Kontroversen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birthler M et al (2009) Das Jahr 1989 feiern, heißt auch, sich an 1939 zu erinnern! Eine Erklärung zum 70. Jahrestag des Hitler-Stalin-Pakts am 23. Osteuropa 59(9):175, also available under http://www.23august1939.de/

  • Eckel J, Moisel C (eds) (2008) Universalisierung des Holocaust? Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik in internationaler Perspektive. Wallstein, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • François É et al (eds) (2013) Geschichtspolitik in Europa seit 1989. Deutschland, Frankreich und Polen im internationalen Vergleich. Wallstein, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer M, Fitzpatrick S (eds) (2009) Beyond totalitarianism. Stalinism and Nazism compared. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn E (1990) Zur Phänomenologie der Massenvernichtung. Leviathan 18(1):31

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn E (2005) On the phenomenology of mass extermination in Europe. A comparative perspective on the Holodomor. In: Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) Sketches of Europe. Old lands, new worlds. Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, Berlin, p. 199

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn E (2015) International politics. Political issues under debate, Vol 1. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse E (ed) (1999) Totalitarismus im 20. Jahrhundert. Eine Bilanz der internationalen Forschung. Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, Bonn, Totalitarismus und Demokratie. Zeitschrift für internationale Diktatur- und Freiheitsforschung, Dresden/Göttingen since 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Jilge W (2008) Nationalukrainischer Befreiungskampf. Die Umwertung des Zweiten Weltkrieges in der Ukraine. In: Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) Geschichtspolitik und Gegenerinnerung. Krieg, Gewalt und Trauma im Osten Europas. Berliner Wiss.-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 182–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt T (1998) Europas Nachkriegsgeschichte neu denken. In: Judt T et al (eds) Vom Neuschreiben der Geschichte. Erinnerungspolitik nach 1945 und nach 1989. Transit 15:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerfer D (2009) Die deutsch-sowjetische Beutepartnerschaft, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 17 Sept 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Kübler E (2012) Europäische Erinnerungspolitik. Der Europarat und die Erinnerung an den Holocaust. Transcript, Bielefeld

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger C, Sedmak C (eds) (2009) Europäische Geschichtskultur – Europäische Geschichtspolitik. Vom Erfinden, Entdecken, Erarbeiten der Bedeutung von Erinnerung und Geschichte für das Verständnis und Selbstverständnis Europas. StudienVerlag, Innsbruck

    Google Scholar 

  • Luks L (2007) Zwei Gesichter des Totalitarismus. Bolschewismus und Nationalsozialismus im Vergleich, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel Y (2013) Verhandlungssache Genozid. Zur Dynamik geschichtspolitischer Deutungskämpfe. Wilhelm Fink, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel RJ (1994) Power, genocide and mass murder. J Peace Res 31(1):4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rürup R (2014) Der lange Schatten des Nationalsozialismus. Geschichte, Geschichtspolitik und Erinnerungskultur. Wallstein, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) (2008) Geschichtspolitik und Gegenerinnerung. Krieg, Gewalt und Trauma im Osten Europas. Osteuropa 58(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) (2009) Der Hitler-Stalin-Pakt. Der Krieg und die europäische Erinnerung. Osteuropa 59(7–8)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlögel K (2008) Orte und Schichten der Erinnerung. Annäherungen an das östliche Europa. In: Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) Geschichtspolitik und Gegenerinnerung. Krieg, Gewalt und Trauma im Osten Europas. Berliner Wiss.-Verlag, Berlin, p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid H (2008) Europäisierung des Auschwitzgedenkens? Zum Aufstieg des 27. Januar 1945 als ‘Holocaustgedenktag’ in Europa. In: Eckel J, Moisel C (eds) 2008: Universalisierung des Holocaust? Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik in internationaler Perspektive. Göttingen, Wallstein, pp. 174–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid H (ed) (2009) Geschichtspolitik und kollektives Gedächtnis. Erinnerungskulturen in Theorie und Praxis. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönhoven K (2007) Europa als Erinnerungsgemeinschaft. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn-Bad Godesberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Stürmer M (1987) Geschichte in geschichtslosem Land. In: Augstein R et al (eds) ‘Historikerstreit’. Die Dokumentation der Kontroverse um die Einzigartigkeit der nationalsozialistischen Judenvernichtung. Piper, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl H (2009) Antithese zum Holocaust-Gedenktag. http://science.orf.at/stories/1626347/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, E. (2015). From the West European Commemoration of Auschwitz to a Pan-European Commemoration of Auschwitz and the GULag Archipelago: An Inevitable Consequence of the Eastward Extension of the EU for Commemoration Policies. In: German Domestic and Foreign Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47929-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics