Skip to main content

Kashmir: Flashpoint for a Nuclear War or Even a Third World War?

  • Chapter
World Political Challenges

Abstract

The former principality of Jammu and Kashmir, usually referred to simply as Kashmir, has become one of the most dangerous centres of conflict in world politics since the founding of the states of Pakistan and India in 1947. Different parts of Kashmir are currently occupied by India, Pakistan and the People’s Republic of China. The population of Kashmir consists mainly of Muslims, although in some parts of the country with their own long history of independence, they are outnumbered by Hindus and Buddhists. The Kashmir conflict is embedded in the wider conflict over the incomplete creation of nations and states on the Indian subcontinent, which during the east-west conflict even threatened at times to escalate into a nuclear world war between Pakistan and the USA on the one side and India and the USSR on the other. Since May 1998, India and Pakistan have faced each other as atomic powers in their own right.

Until now, there have been three wars between India and Pakistan over the state affiliation of Jammu and Kashmir: in 1947–49, 1965 and 1999. The Kashmir question was also thrown open by the Indo-Pakistani war over the independence of East Pakistan/Bangladesh in 1971. Finally, the Indo-Chinese border war of 1962 led to the secession of Aksai Chin from Jammu and Kashmir and the Chinese occupation of this almost uninhabited, strategically important high plateau. Even after these five wars, the “frozen conflict” between Pakistan and India repeatedly flickered after brief intervals in the form of armed disputes between terrorist groups and troops, as well as mass political demonstrations and acts of suppression by the police and military, and could unexpectedly again lead to a regional and under certain circumstances even a major nuclear war.

There are also political forces that are playing an important role in the conflict, alongside Pakistani and Indian maximum demands for the entire territory of Jammu and Kashmir, usually silently waiving claims to the Chinese occupied areas. These forces are demanding the independence of the entire country from both India and Pakistan, while at the same time, others are striving to achieve regional autonomy for Jammu and Ladakh within India or strengthen the regional autonomy of Azad Kashmir within Pakistan. Finally, the progress of the wars in Afghanistan, the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the increasing importance of the global and geopolitical competition between the USA and the People’s Republic of China have also significantly altered the power constellations within and around Kashmir. A concept for peace that could regulate the conflict and also resolve many border issues is feasible if it is supported by several local and regional referenda, but is unlikely in the coming decades to meet with the agreement of the decisive conflicting parties.

Lecture given on 22.10.2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rothermund (2002, p. 42, see also p. 89).

  2. 2.

    Ganguly (2008, p. 33 et seq).

  3. 3.

    Pakistan Nuclear Weapons, in: http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/pakistan/nuke.htm (retrieved on 11.7.2012).

  4. 4.

    Piper, Gerhard: Nuklearindustrie und Atomarsenal Indiens, in: http://www.bits.de/public/articles/ami/ami0202.htm (retrieved on 11.7.2012).

  5. 5.

    Status of World Nuclear Forces, in: http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/nuclearweapons/nukestatus.html (retrieved on 11.7.2012).

  6. 6.

    Ganguly (2008, p. 34).

  7. 7.

    Wagner (2009, p. 1).

  8. 8.

    This area data (Fischer 2006, p. 225) differs from the total areas for the individual territories together on page 9, probably due to the double calculations.

  9. 9.

    Ganguly (2008, p. 32, Note 3). Other authors give other figures, some over 600.

  10. 10.

    Golzio (2007, p. 20).

  11. 11.

    Maurer (2007, p. 95).

  12. 12.

    My own compilation according to several German and English Wikipedia articles on the territories (retrieved at the beginning of July 2012). However, very different figures are also given, e.g. by Schönheit (2011, p. 360).

  13. 13.

    Thus seven different recommendations for a resolution are presented by BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/south_asia/03/kashmir_future/html/7.stm (retrieved on 12.7.2012).

  14. 14.

    Rothermund (2002, p. 25).

  15. 15.

    http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unmogip/facts.shtml (retrieved on 9.7.2012).

  16. 16.

    Tariq et al. (2011, p. 33).

  17. 17.

    Roy (2011, p. 65).

  18. 18.

    Rothermund (2002, p. 43).

  19. 19.

    On the suggestion for a Siachen Peace Park see http://www.scribd.com/doc/17137450/Siachen-Peace-Park (retrieved on 9.7.2012).

  20. 20.

    Tariq et al. (2011, p. 1) gives a figure of 80,000 dead.

  21. 21.

    Kumar and Puri (2010, p. 281).

References

  • Fischer (2006) Der Fischer Weltalmanach 2007. Fischer, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly S (2008) Der indisch-pakistanische Konflikt. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Golzio K-H (2007) Der Konflikt um Kaschmir – seine Wurzeln, sein Ausbruch, seine Entwicklung. In: Conermann S (ed) Asien heute: Konflikte ohne Ende. EB-Verlag, Hamburg-Schenefeld

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Puri E (2010) Puri, Ellora: Jammu and Kashmir. Frameworks for a settlement. In: Kumar R (ed) Negotiating peace in deeply divided societies. Sage, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer P (2007) Buddhisten und Muslime in Ladakh. Eine friedliche Koexistenz. In: Conermann S (ed) Asien heute: Konflikte ohne Ende. EB-Verlag, Hamburg-Schenefeld

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothermund D (2002) Krisenherd Kaschmir. Der Konflikt der Atommächte Indien und Pakistan. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy A (2011) Azadi: the only thing Kashmiris want. In: Tariq A et al (eds) Kashmir: the case for freedom. Verso Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönheit R (2011) Kaschmir. In: Gornig G (ed) Krisengebiete der Welt. Völkerrechtliche und politische Aspekte. Peter Lang, Frankfurt et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tariq A et al (2011) Kashmir: the case of freedom. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C (2009) Jenseits von Kaschmir. Chancen einer Annäherung zwischen Indien und Pakistan. SWP-Aktuell

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, E. (2015). Kashmir: Flashpoint for a Nuclear War or Even a Third World War?. In: World Political Challenges. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47912-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics