Skip to main content
  • 2460 Accesses

Abstract

Every company has its very own enterprise architecture – even if its staff are not aware of this – and in times of technological change, it is particularly important to deal with this issue. The automotive industry has already entered such a phase. Even if most companies are now well aware of this: What can be done about it now? The significance that enterprise architecture has had until now in no way automatically secures companies a place in the mobility industry of the future, which is still in the process of formation. It is therefore high time for us to look at the architecture of our own companies in a critical light – because once we really see it right from its foundations, this is the best possible basis for adapting it to new challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Google’s Next Phase in Driverless Cars: No Steering Wheel or Brake Pedals” http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/28/technology/googles-next-phase-in-driverless-cars-no-brakes-or-steering-wheel.html. Accessed: 19 December 2014.

  2. 2.

    Toyota Business Report 2013 – “What is essential to building the better cars of the future?” has an unchanged approach in terms of pursuing the systematically best way of manufacturing cars [11].

  3. 3.

    We write AUTOmobile in order to emphasise ‘Auto’ – the German word for car.

  4. 4.

    We write AutoMOBILE to emphasise the mobility of travelling from one place to another.

  5. 5.

    The life cycle can also be defined in a more general way. This would begin with the extraction of the raw materials before the actual development and manufacture, and end with disposal after the sale and operation of the vehicle. Here, however, we will only concentrate on those sections of the vehicle life cycle which are part of the immediate core business of the automotive industry.

  6. 6.

    Strictly speaking, a motor vehicle is a vehicle which is powered by a motor and is not track-guided.

  7. 7.

    §9 section 2 of the German Motorised Vehicles Tax Act (KraftStG): http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kraftstg/__9.html. Accessed: 19 December 2014.

  8. 8.

    “Acriss – Industry standard vehicle matrix to define car models” http://www.acriss.org/car-codes.asp. Accessed: 19 December 2014.

  9. 9.

    “50 models in category check” http://www.autobild.de/artikel/kfz-versicherung-typklassen-2015-1288049.html. Accessed: 19 December 2014.

  10. 10.

    “Brand cannibalism in the automotive sector: Increasing number of models causes angst.” http://www.automobilwoche.de/article/20150224/AGENTURMELDUNGEN/302249990/1276/markenkannibalismus-in-der-autobranche-modelle-essen-seele-auf. Accessed: 24 February 2015.

  11. 11.

    By the year 2020, for example, Mercedes-Benz is to bring 12 additional unprecedented models to market. http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/mercedes-benz-confirms-12-all-new-models-2020. Accessed: 19 December 2014.

  12. 12.

    According to a study [13] from the year 2002, an average of two thirds of the parts of each vehicle came from suppliers rather than OEMs. Ten years later, a further study [23] showed that the proportion of work completed by OEMs and suppliers had changed even more, with the value-added share of OEMs dropping to 29 %.

  13. 13.

    “Google partners with auto suppliers on self-driving car” http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/14/us-autoshow-google-urmson-idUSKBN0KN29820150114. Accessed: 15 January 2015.

  14. 14.

    In data analysis, the data is collected during different phases before being examined, evaluated and presented in such a way that it can be used for decision-making within the company.

  15. 15.

    “Platform Industry 4.0” http://www.plattform-i40.de. Accessed: 19 December 2014.

  16. 16.

    Depending on the type of vehicle manufacturer, IT staff make up around 1–2 % of the company staff.

  17. 17.

    The actual use and benefit of frameworks in businesses is difficult to estimate, and can only be evaluated using surveys or frequencies of references in the literature [15].

References

  1. Ahlemann F, Stettiner E, Messerschmidt M, Legner C (2012) Strategic enterprise architecture management: challenges, best practices, and future developments. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach N, Brehm C, Buchholz W, Petry T (2012) Wertschöpfungsorientierte organisation: architekturen – prozesse – strukturen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. BMW Technology Guide: iDrive Touch Controller. http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/technology/technology_guide/articles/controller.html. Accessed 7 June 2015

  4. Böder J, Gröne B (2014) The architecture of SAP ERP: understand how successful software works. Tredition GmbH, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bullinger H-J, Spath D, Warnecke H-J, Westkämper E (Hrsg.) (2009) Handbuch unternehmensorganisation: strategien, planung, umsetzung, 3rd Aufl. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke C (2005) Automotive production systems and standardisation: from Ford to the case of Mercedes-Benz. Physica, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Commission of the European Communities (1999) Case No COMP/M.1406 – Hyundai / Kia: Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 merger procedure: Article 6(1)(b), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanschke I (2012) Enterprise architecture management – einfach und effektiv. Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  9. IBM Institute for Business Value (2014) The new hero of big data and analytics: the chief data officer. IBM Corporation, Somers, NY

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keller W (2012)IT-Unternehmensarchitektur – Von der Geschäftsstrategie zur optimalen IT-Unterstützung. Dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matthes D (2011) Enterprise architecture frameworks kompendium. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Mercer Management Consulting, Fraunhofer-Institut für Produktionstechnik und Automatisierung -IPA-, Fraunhofer-Institut für Materialfluss und Logistik -IML- (2004) Future automotive industry structure (FAST) 2015 – die neue arbeitsteilung in der automobilindustrie. Materialien zur automobilindustrie, vol 32. Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA), Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monk EF, Wagner BJ (2008) Concepts in enterprise resource planning, 3rd edn. Course Technology, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Obitz T, Babu KM (2009) Enterprise architecture expands its role in strategic business transformation. Infosys Technologies Limited, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Regan R (2014) Chief analytics officer: the ultimate big data job? Computerworld. http://www.computerworld.com/article/2688352/chief-analytics-officer-the-ultimate-big-data-job.html. Accessed 7 June 2015

  17. Perks C, Beveridge T (2003) Guide to enterprise IT architecture. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ross JW, Weill P, Robertson DC (2006) Enterprise architecture as strategy: creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sessions R (2007) A comparison of the top four enterprise-architecture methodologies. White paper, ObjectWatch. https://www.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb466232.aspx. Accessed 7 June 2015

  20. Statistisches Bundesamt (2013) Produzierendes Gewerbe: Betriebe, Tätige Personen und Umsatz des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes sowie des Bergbaus und der Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden nach Beschäftigtengrößenklassen. Fachserie 4 Reihe 4.1.2, published on 8 May 2014, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Open Group (2011) TOGAF®; Version 9.1. Van Haren Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weber J (2009) Automotive development processes: processes for successful customer oriented vehicle development. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Wyman O, Verband der Automobilindustrie (2012) FAST 2025 – Massiver Wandel in der automobilen Wertschöpfungsstruktur. http://www.oliverwyman.de/who-we-are/press-releases/2012/fast-2025-_-massiver-wandel-in-der-automobilen-wertschoepfungsst.html. Accessed 7 June 2015

  24. Zachman JA (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J. doi:10.1147/sj.263.0276

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wedeniwski, S. (2015). Introduction. In: The Mobility Revolution in the Automotive Industry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47788-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47788-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47787-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47788-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics