Advertisement

Shoes

  • Sherry H. Yu
  • Apra Sood
  • James S. TaylorEmail author
Chapter
  • 851 Downloads

Abstract

Shoe allergy is fairly common and should be considered in all patients with chronic foot eczema. The main components of shoes include uppers/straps, soles, insoles, and heel and toe counters (stiff elements maintaining shape), all attached with adhesives. Allergy to rubber, leather, or adhesive as well as dyes and textiles found in shoes may cause allergic contact dermatitis of the feet, especially in patients with hyperhidrosis or personal history of atopy. The differential diagnosis of foot dermatitis is broad and includes psoriasis, tinea pedis, atopic eczema, irritant dermatitis, allergy to topical medicaments or nylon stockings, and in children, juvenile plantar dermatitis. Shoe allergy may appear superimposed on other dermatoses with patients sometimes having more than one diagnosis (e.g., both atopic and contact dermatitis) and more than one allergen (e.g., shoe component plus a topical medicament). Patch testing to the standard series, expanded shoe series, and physical pieces of the patient’s shoes is important for proper diagnosis. Prognosis in shoe allergy is good with allergen avoidance and substitution of hypoallergenic shoes or shoe components.

Keywords

Shoe allergy Foot dermatitis Hypoallergenic shoes Patch testing Occlusive footwear Leather tanning Shoe dyes Para-tertiary-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (PTBPF-R) Thiurams Potassium dichromate Colophony Mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) Dimethylfumarate P-phenylenediamine (PPDA) 

References

  1. 1.
    Goossens A, Taylor JS. Shoes. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP, editors. Contact dermatitis. 5th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Warshaw EM, Schram SE, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler Jr JF, Maibach HI, Marks Jr JG, Mathias CG, Pratt MD, Rietschel RL, Sassevile D, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS, Zug KA. Shoe allergens: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001–2004. Dermatitis. 2007;18(4):191–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darling MI, Horn HM, McCormack SKA, Schofield OMV. Sole dermatitis in children, patch testing revisited. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29(3):254–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nardella A, Taveirne M, Drieghe J, Degreef H, Goossens A. The relation between the localization of foot dermatitis and causative allergens in shoes: a 13-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(4):201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chowdhuri S, Ghosh S. Epidemio-allergological study in 155 cases of footwear dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73(5):319–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strauss RM, Wilkinson SM. Shoe dermatitis due to colophonium used as leather tanning or finishing agent in Portuguese shoes. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;47(1):59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freeman S. Shoe dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:247–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Landeck L, Uter W, John SM. Patch test characteristics of patients referred for suspected contact allergy of the feet- retrospective 10-year cross-sectional study of the IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(5):271–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nedorost S. Clinical patterns of hand and foot dermatitis: emphasis on rubber and chromate allergens. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(3):281–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thyssen JP, Strandesen M, Poulsen PB, Menné T, Johansen JD. Chromium in leather footwear-risk assessment of chromium allergy and dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(5):279–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lyon CC, Tucker SC, Gäfvert E, Karlberg AT, Beck MH. Contact dermatitis from modified rosin footwear. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:102–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Jellesen MS, Møller P, Sloth JJ, Zachariae C, Menné T. Consumer leather exposure: an unrecognized cause of cobalt sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(5):276–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thyssen JP, Jellesen MS, Møller P, Menné T, Johansen JD. Allergic chromium dermatitis from wearing ‘chromium-free’ footwear. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70(3):185–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lefranc A, Flesch F, Cochet A, Daoudi J, Crinier R, French Dimethylfumarate Working Group. Epidemiological description of an outbreak of dermatitis related to dimethylfumarate, France 2008. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2008;66(4):217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hartmann K, Hunzelmann N. Allergic contact dermatitis from cinnamon as an odour-neutralizing agent in shoe insoles. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50(4):253–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matthys E, Zahir A, Ehrlich A. Shoe allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2014;25(4):163–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holden CR, Gawkrodger DJ. 10 years’ experience of patch testing with a shoe series in 230 patients: which allergens are important. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(1):37–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyCase Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Dermatology-Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations