Advertisement

Dental Materials

  • Marléne IsakssonEmail author
Chapter
  • 872 Downloads

Abstract

Dental professionals and dental patients are exposed to the same sensitizers even if the exposure differs and also the outcome. Dental professionals suffer predominantly from irritant contact dermatitis and to a lesser degree from allergic contact dermatitis to (meth)acrylates and rubber products. Dental patients rarely have allergic contact stomatitis. The major sensitizers in dental professionals are methacrylates in dentin bonding agents, in dental composite resins, and in prostheses in addition to rubber chemicals, metals, fragrances, and disinfectants. In dental patients metal contact allergy dominates. The various sensitizers that may give lichenoid reactions in these patients are also discussed.

Keywords

Methacrylates Acrylates Contact allergy Allergic contact dermatitis Stomatitis Metals Dental materials 

References

  1. 1.
    Gawkrodger DJ. Investigation of reactions to dental materials. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153:479–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ. Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians. (I). Clinical picture and causative factors. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:125–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanerva L, Mikola H, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Jolanki R, Estlander T. Fingertip paresthesia and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylics in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:114–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Svedman C. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from methacrylates in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaaber S, Thulin H, Nielsen E. Skin sensitivity to denture base materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5:90–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wakkers-Garritsen BG, Timmer LH, Nater JP. Etiological factors in the denture sore mouth syndrome: an investigation of 24 patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:337–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Peluso AM. Contact and irritant stomatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1997;16:314–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Occupational skin allergy in the dental profession. Dermatol Clin. 1994;12:517–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jalili S, Bruze M, Isaksson M. Contact allergy to mercury in dental amalgam. Elective study, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isaksson M. Dental materials. In: Duus Johansen J, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P, editors. Contact dermatitis. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 763–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laeijendecker R, van Joost T. Oral manifestations of gold allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30:205–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E, Kanerva L, Hensten-Pettersen A. Nickel allergy in adolescents in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:148–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wataha JC, Hanks CT. Biological effects of palladium and risk of using palladium in dental casting alloys. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:309–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hindsén M, Spirén A, Bruze M. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:2–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schweitzer A. Erstfeststellung einer Titan-Allergie. Dermatosen. 1997;45:190.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jalili S, Bruze M, Isaksson M. 11 years of patch testing with titanium in the dental series. Abstract European Society of Contact Dermatitis meeting, Estoril; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Helton J, Storrs F. The burning mouth syndrome: lack of a role for contact urticaria and contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:201–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Virgili A, Corazza M, Trombelli L, Arcidiacono A. Burning mouth syndrome: the role of contact hypersensitivity. Acta Derm Venereol. 1996;76:488–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dutree Meulenberg RO, Kozel MM, van Joost T. Burning mouth syndrome: a possible etiological role for local contact hypersensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:935–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaaber S. Allergy to dental materials with special reference to the use of amalgam and polymethylmethacrylate. Int Dent J. 1990;40:359–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goon AT, Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Bruze M. Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:219–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goon ATJ, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Isaksson M. Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bruze M, Björkner B, Lepoittevin JP. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;32:156–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Sörensen O, Goh CL, Koh DS, et al. Correlation between stated and measured concentrations of acrylate and methacrylate allergens in patch-test preparations. Dermatitis. 2011;22:27–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Sörensen Ö, Goh CL, Koh DS, et al. Variation in allergen content over time of acrylates/methacrylates in patch test preparations. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:116–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Sörensen O, Isaksson M. Effect of air transport on acrylate/methacrylate allergens in syringes and IQ chambers. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:297–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Sundberg K, Hallander A, Bruze M. The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:292–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bruze M, Hedman H, Björkner B, Möller H. The development and course of test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:386–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kanerva L, Lauerma AI. Iatrogenic acrylate allergy complicating amalgam allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;38:58–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologySkåne University HospitalMalmö, SkåneSweden

Personalised recommendations