Skip to main content

Abstract

Several thousands of synthetic or natural (mixtures of) fragrances are used mainly for perfuming cosmetic products, but partly also in household or technical products, topical medicines or toys. Routine patch testing uses fragrance mix I (seven synthetics and one natural extract), II (five synthetics – one, hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, presently also tested as single allergen at 5 % in petrolatum) and Myroxylon pereirae resin (Balsam of Peru). Around 16 % of consecutively patch-tested patients are positive to these markers. The patient’s history as well as clinical presentation may either be suggestive of fragrances as cause of contact dermatitis (e.g. fine fragrances, after shaves, deodorants) or less suggestive if, e.g. fragranced body lotions, hand creams, etc. have caused dermatitis. Patch testing of own products and, in case of diagnostic doubt, repeated open application testing are valuable tools to better diagnose or verify contact sensitisation to a fragrance compound. Secondary prevention relies on ingredient information (not only, but foremost, in cosmetics) as (1) basis for adequate patch testing and (2) later allergen avoidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Api AM, Basketter DA, et al. Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;52(1):3–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonefeld CM, Nielsen MM, et al. Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(6):336–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruze M, Svedman C, et al. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(3):131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(5):986–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frosch PJ, Geier J, et al. Patch testing with the patient’s own products. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP, editors. Contact dermatitis. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 1107–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in humans: experimental and quantitative aspects. In: Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP, editors. Contact dermatitis. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 241–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Karlberg A-T, Börje A, et al. Activation of non-sensitizing or low-sensitizing fragrance substances into potent sensitizers - prehaptens and prohaptens. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(6):323–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfützner W, Thomas P, et al. Systemic contact dermatitis elicited by oral intake of Balsam of Peru. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003;83(4):294–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salam TN, Fowler Jr JF. Balsam-related systemic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(3):377–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SCCS. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), opinion on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. Brussels: European Commission, DG SANCO; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schnuch A, Oppel E, et al. Experimental inhalation of fragrance allergens in predisposed subjects: effects on skin and airways. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(3):598–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uter W, Geier J, et al. Risk factors associated with sensitization to hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(2):72–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uter W, Johansen JD, et al. Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(4):196–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uter W, Schnuch A, et al. Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(6):392–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uter W, Yazar K, et al. Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. fragrances. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69:335–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Uter MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uter, W. (2016). Fragrances. In: Johansen, J., Lepoittevin, JP., Thyssen, J. (eds) Quick Guide to Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47714-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47714-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47713-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47714-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics