Zusammenfassung
Wie stellen Organisationen sicher, dass sie nicht nur als umweltoffene Systeme in einer turbulenten, oft feindlichen Umwelt überleben, sondern über die Überlebensfähigkeit hinaus Fortschrittsfähigkeit unter Beweis stellen und die Fähigkeit zur Selbsttransformation aufbringen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsLiteratur
Anderson LM, Bateman TS (2000) Individual environmental initiative: championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations. Acad Manage J 43(4):548–570
Argyris C, Schön DA (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Bansal P (2003) From issues to actions: the importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organ Sci 14(5):510–527
Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J 43(4):717–736
Berthoin Antal A, Dierkes M, Child J, Nonaka I (2001) Organizational learning and knowledge: reflections on the dynamics of the field and challenges for the future. In: Dierkes M, Berthoin Antal A, Child J, Nonaka I (Hrsg) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York, S 921–939
Berthoin Antal A, Dierkes M, MacMillan K, Marz, L (2002) Corporate social reporting revisited. J Gen Manage 28(2):22–42
Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence TB (2003) Resources, knowledge, and influenced: the organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. J Manage Stud 40(2):321–347
Hedberg B (1981) How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (Hrsg) Handbook of organizational design, vol 1. Adapting organizations to their environments. Oxford University Press, New York, S 3–27
Kakabadse AP, Dainty P (1988) Police chief officers: a management development survey. J Manage Psychol 3(3):106–108
Margerison CM, Kakabadse AP (1984) How American chief executives succeed: implications for developing high-potential employees. In: An American management association survey report
Nadler DA (1977) Feedback and organisation development: using data feedback methods. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Nadler DA (1981) Managing organisational change: an integrating perspective. J Appl Behav Sci 17:191–211
Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation Organ Sci 5(1):14–37
Pedler MJ, Boydell T, Burgoyne JG (1989) Towards the learning company. J Manage Educ Dev 20(1):1–8
Preston LE, Rey F, Dierkes M (1981) Comparing corporate social performance: Germany, France, Canada, and the U.S. In: Sethi SP, Swanson CL (Hrsg) Private enterprise and public purpose. Wiley, New York, S 117–128
Ramus CA, Steger U (2000) The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee eco-initiatives at leading-edge European companies. Acad Manage J 43(4):605–626
Reverdy T (2005) Management environmental et dynamique d’apprentissage. Revue Française Gestion 31(158):187–205
Sharma S (2000) Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manage J 43(4):681–697
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Retschitzegger, M. (2016). CSR und lernende Organisation/Double-Loop-Learning. In: Schram, B., Schmidpeter, R. (eds) CSR und Organisationsentwicklung. Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47700-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47700-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47699-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47700-7
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)