Advertisement

CSR und lernende Organisation/Double-Loop-Learning

  • Michael RetschitzeggerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility book series (MRCOSORE)

Zusammenfassung

Wie stellen Organisationen sicher, dass sie nicht nur als umweltoffene Systeme in einer turbulenten, oft feindlichen Umwelt überleben, sondern über die Überlebensfähigkeit hinaus Fortschrittsfähigkeit unter Beweis stellen und die Fähigkeit zur Selbsttransformation aufbringen.

Literatur

  1. Anderson LM, Bateman TS (2000) Individual environmental initiative: championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations. Acad Manage J 43(4):548–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris C, Schön DA (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal P (2003) From issues to actions: the importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organ Sci 14(5):510–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J 43(4):717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berthoin Antal A, Dierkes M, Child J, Nonaka I (2001) Organizational learning and knowledge: reflections on the dynamics of the field and challenges for the future. In: Dierkes M, Berthoin Antal A, Child J, Nonaka I (Hrsg) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York, S 921–939Google Scholar
  6. Berthoin Antal A, Dierkes M, MacMillan K, Marz, L (2002) Corporate social reporting revisited. J Gen Manage 28(2):22–42Google Scholar
  7. Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence TB (2003) Resources, knowledge, and influenced: the organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. J Manage Stud 40(2):321–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hedberg B (1981) How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (Hrsg) Handbook of organizational design, vol 1. Adapting organizations to their environments. Oxford University Press, New York, S 3–27Google Scholar
  9. Kakabadse AP, Dainty P (1988) Police chief officers: a management development survey. J Manage Psychol 3(3):106–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Margerison CM, Kakabadse AP (1984) How American chief executives succeed: implications for developing high-potential employees. In: An American management association survey reportGoogle Scholar
  11. Nadler DA (1977) Feedback and organisation development: using data feedback methods. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  12. Nadler DA (1981) Managing organisational change: an integrating perspective. J Appl Behav Sci 17:191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation Organ Sci 5(1):14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pedler MJ, Boydell T, Burgoyne JG (1989) Towards the learning company. J Manage Educ Dev 20(1):1–8Google Scholar
  15. Preston LE, Rey F, Dierkes M (1981) Comparing corporate social performance: Germany, France, Canada, and the U.S. In: Sethi SP, Swanson CL (Hrsg) Private enterprise and public purpose. Wiley, New York, S 117–128Google Scholar
  16. Ramus CA, Steger U (2000) The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee eco-initiatives at leading-edge European companies. Acad Manage J 43(4):605–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reverdy T (2005) Management environmental et dynamique d’apprentissage. Revue Française Gestion 31(158):187–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sharma S (2000) Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manage J 43(4):681–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations