Skip to main content

The Castling of Presidential Functions by Vladimir Putin

  • Chapter
International Politics
  • 793 Accesses

Abstract

For years, there was speculation as to how Vladimir V. Putin would hold on to power in Russia after his second term in office as state president expired in 2008. After all, the probability that this still very energetic, healthy politician, who at that time was just 56 years old, would play by the democratic rules and withdraw from the nerve centre of political power was generally regarded as being very low. From the numerous ways of retaining power, Putin opted in the autumn of 2007 to castle the presidential offices. He rejected a change in the constitution that would have enabled his re-election as state president, and on 1 October 2007 declared himself willing, as he was being celebrated as the “leader of the entire nation” to be a leading candidate for the “United Russia” (Yedinaya Rossiya) party, even though he did not become a party member. Thanks to the support from the president in the elections on 2 December 2007, which were neither free nor fair, the party achieved an overwhelming victory, with 64.3 % of the vote and more than two-thirds of the seats in the Duma. This victory, alongside the election of a “decent, capable and modern person” to the post of state president, was given by Putin as a precondition for his willingness to take over office as prime minister.

Speculation then arose as to whether Putin, with a constitution-changing two-thirds majority in the Duma, might extend the competencies of the prime minister at the cost of those previously held by the state president, an option that Putin decisively rejected, however. For several weeks, he left it unclear to Russia and the world which “decent” person he would recommend as his successor. The information political system in Russia, already characterised in the lecture of 5 July 2004 as being a “temporary, plebiscitary adoptive autocracy”, provides that the incumbent president effectively adopts his successor, even if they only then enter office by means of an “election”, which has deteriorated to a mere acclamation. For a long time, it remained unclear whom Putin wished to have as his successor. Shortly after the Duma elections, the decision was made in favour of his St. Petersburg acolyte, Dmitri Medvedev, who at that time was 42, and was First Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the board of directors at the powerful majority state-owned company Gazprom.

It remains unclear to this day what informal mechanisms were used to guarantee Putin’s supremacy over the state president Medvedev in the presidential system of power. At any rate, in May 2012, Putin castled again. He returned to office as state president and Medvedev went back to being prime minister without having set in motion the modernisation of the economy and the liberalisation of the political system that some observers had hoped for. It was far more the case that the autocratic elements in the system were further expanded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sakwa (2010).

  2. 2.

    Jahn (2012).

  3. 3.

    Sapper and Weichsel (2012), White (2011).

  4. 4.

    Freedom in the World (2014).

  5. 5.

    Kynev (2012).

  6. 6.

    This law was again sharpened in June 2012, see Melkojanz (2013).

  7. 7.

    Gabowitsch (2013).

  8. 8.

    Krawatzek (2013), Minssen (2012), Lassila (2012).

  9. 9.

    Schulze (2007, p. 293).

  10. 10.

    Dubovitsky (2009).

  11. 11.

    Russian Federation. Elections to the State Duma 4 December 2011. OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report, http://www.osce.org/odihr/86959?download=true.

  12. 12.

    Wischnewjskij (2014), Ross (2014), Mommsen (2010).

  13. 13.

    Malek (2004).

  14. 14.

    Gudkov and Zaslavsky (2011).

  15. 15.

    Erler (2012, p. 21).

  16. 16.

    Engelfried (2012).

  17. 17.

    Putin (2007).

  18. 18.

    In justifying the annexation of Crimea in March 2014, Putin also referred to the precedent of Kosovo, which he had formerly severely criticised.

  19. 19.

    Schulze (2012, pp. 102–104).

  20. 20.

    Shevcova (2007).

References

  • Dubovitsky N (2009) Okolonulya, supplement to “Russki Pioner”. Berlin Verlag, Berlin (German edition: Dubowizki, Natan 2010: Nahe Null)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelfried A (2012) Zar und Star. Vladimir Putins Medienimage. Osteuropa 62(5):47–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Erler G (2012) Die Europäisierung Russlands: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. In: Erler G, Schulze PW (eds) Die Europäisierung Russlands. Moskau zwischen Modernisierungspartnerschaft und Großmachtrolle. Campus, Frankfurt a M, New York, pp. 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom in the World (2014) https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FIW%202014%20Scores%20-%20Countries%20and%20Territories.pdf (retrieved on 5.12.2014).

  • Gabowitsch M (2013) Putin kaputt!? Rußlands neue Protestkultur. Suhrkamp, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudkov L, Zaslavsky V (2011) Russland. Kein Weg aus dem postkommunistischen Übergang. Wagenbach, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn E (2012) Putins Siege: Niederlagen der Demokratie in Rußland? In: Politische Streitfragen, Band 3. Internationale Politik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Krawatzek F (2013) Komsomol, Naši und Informelle. Jugendmobilisierung in Russland. Osteuropa 63(11/12):137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynev A (2012) Kontrollverlust, manipulation, protest. Die Dumawahlen 2011 in Russland. Osteuropa 62(1):25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassila J (2012) The quest for an ideal youth in Putin’s Russia II. The search for distinctive conformism in the political communication of Nashi, 2005–2009. Ibidem, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek M (2004) Rußlands Kriege in Tschetschenien. “Wiederherstellung der verfassungsmäßigen Ordnung”, “Antiterror-Operation” oder Völkermord? Zeitschrift für Genozidforschung 5(1):101–129

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Melkojanz G (2013) Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Staat in Russland: aus der Geschichte in die Moderne. Russland-Analysen 265:2–6, 25 October. http://www.laender-analysen.de/russland/pdf/RusslandAnalysen265.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Minssen I (2012) The quest for an ideal youth in Putin’s Russia I. Back to our future! History, modernity and patriotism according to Nashi, 2005–2012. ibidem, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mommsen M (2010) Oligarchie und Autokratie. Das hybride politische System Russlands. Osteuropa 60(8):25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Putin V (2007) The unipolar model is unacceptable in today’s world. http://www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Sicherheitskonferenz/2007-putin.html.

  • Ross C (2014) Das Paradox: Putins populäre Autokratie. Legitimitätsquellen in einem hybriden Regime. Osteuropa 64(8):99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa R (2010) The crisis of Russian democracy. The dual state, factionalism and the Medvedev succession. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) (2012) Auge auf! Aufbruch und Regression in Rußland. Osteuropa 62(6–8):7–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze PW (2007) Souveräne Demokratie: Kampfbegriff oder Hilfskonstruktion für einen eigenständigen Entwicklungsweg?—die ideologische Offensive des Vladislav Surkov. In: Buhbe M, Gorzka G (eds) Russland heute. Rezentralisierung des Staates unter Putin. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 293–313

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze PW (2012) Genesis und Perspektiven des politischen Systems in Russland. In: Erler G, Schulze PW (eds) Die Europäisierung Russlands. Moskau zwischen Modernisierungspartnerschaft und Großmachtrolle. Campus, New York, Frankfurt a M, pp. 33–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevcova L (2007) Russia. Lost in transition. The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies. Carnegie Endowment, Moskau

    Google Scholar 

  • White S (ed) (2011) Understanding Russian politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischnewjskij B (2014) Unterschätzte Macht des knurrenden Magens. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 14 August, http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/putin-unter-druck-unterschaetzte-macht-des-knurrenden-magen-1.2086829

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, E. (2015). The Castling of Presidential Functions by Vladimir Putin. In: International Politics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47685-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics