Abstract
For years, there was speculation as to how Vladimir V. Putin would hold on to power in Russia after his second term in office as state president expired in 2008. After all, the probability that this still very energetic, healthy politician, who at that time was just 56 years old, would play by the democratic rules and withdraw from the nerve centre of political power was generally regarded as being very low. From the numerous ways of retaining power, Putin opted in the autumn of 2007 to castle the presidential offices. He rejected a change in the constitution that would have enabled his re-election as state president, and on 1 October 2007 declared himself willing, as he was being celebrated as the “leader of the entire nation” to be a leading candidate for the “United Russia” (Yedinaya Rossiya) party, even though he did not become a party member. Thanks to the support from the president in the elections on 2 December 2007, which were neither free nor fair, the party achieved an overwhelming victory, with 64.3 % of the vote and more than two-thirds of the seats in the Duma. This victory, alongside the election of a “decent, capable and modern person” to the post of state president, was given by Putin as a precondition for his willingness to take over office as prime minister.
Speculation then arose as to whether Putin, with a constitution-changing two-thirds majority in the Duma, might extend the competencies of the prime minister at the cost of those previously held by the state president, an option that Putin decisively rejected, however. For several weeks, he left it unclear to Russia and the world which “decent” person he would recommend as his successor. The information political system in Russia, already characterised in the lecture of 5 July 2004 as being a “temporary, plebiscitary adoptive autocracy”, provides that the incumbent president effectively adopts his successor, even if they only then enter office by means of an “election”, which has deteriorated to a mere acclamation. For a long time, it remained unclear whom Putin wished to have as his successor. Shortly after the Duma elections, the decision was made in favour of his St. Petersburg acolyte, Dmitri Medvedev, who at that time was 42, and was First Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the board of directors at the powerful majority state-owned company Gazprom.
It remains unclear to this day what informal mechanisms were used to guarantee Putin’s supremacy over the state president Medvedev in the presidential system of power. At any rate, in May 2012, Putin castled again. He returned to office as state president and Medvedev went back to being prime minister without having set in motion the modernisation of the economy and the liberalisation of the political system that some observers had hoped for. It was far more the case that the autocratic elements in the system were further expanded.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sakwa (2010).
- 2.
Jahn (2012).
- 3.
- 4.
Freedom in the World (2014).
- 5.
Kynev (2012).
- 6.
This law was again sharpened in June 2012, see Melkojanz (2013).
- 7.
Gabowitsch (2013).
- 8.
- 9.
Schulze (2007, p. 293).
- 10.
Dubovitsky (2009).
- 11.
Russian Federation. Elections to the State Duma 4 December 2011. OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report, http://www.osce.org/odihr/86959?download=true.
- 12.
- 13.
Malek (2004).
- 14.
Gudkov and Zaslavsky (2011).
- 15.
Erler (2012, p. 21).
- 16.
Engelfried (2012).
- 17.
Putin (2007).
- 18.
In justifying the annexation of Crimea in March 2014, Putin also referred to the precedent of Kosovo, which he had formerly severely criticised.
- 19.
Schulze (2012, pp. 102–104).
- 20.
Shevcova (2007).
References
Dubovitsky N (2009) Okolonulya, supplement to “Russki Pioner”. Berlin Verlag, Berlin (German edition: Dubowizki, Natan 2010: Nahe Null)
Engelfried A (2012) Zar und Star. Vladimir Putins Medienimage. Osteuropa 62(5):47–67
Erler G (2012) Die Europäisierung Russlands: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. In: Erler G, Schulze PW (eds) Die Europäisierung Russlands. Moskau zwischen Modernisierungspartnerschaft und Großmachtrolle. Campus, Frankfurt a M, New York, pp. 9–32
Freedom in the World (2014) https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FIW%202014%20Scores%20-%20Countries%20and%20Territories.pdf (retrieved on 5.12.2014).
Gabowitsch M (2013) Putin kaputt!? Rußlands neue Protestkultur. Suhrkamp, Berlin
Gudkov L, Zaslavsky V (2011) Russland. Kein Weg aus dem postkommunistischen Übergang. Wagenbach, Berlin
Jahn E (2012) Putins Siege: Niederlagen der Demokratie in Rußland? In: Politische Streitfragen, Band 3. Internationale Politik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 125–142
Krawatzek F (2013) Komsomol, Naši und Informelle. Jugendmobilisierung in Russland. Osteuropa 63(11/12):137–149
Kynev A (2012) Kontrollverlust, manipulation, protest. Die Dumawahlen 2011 in Russland. Osteuropa 62(1):25–40
Lassila J (2012) The quest for an ideal youth in Putin’s Russia II. The search for distinctive conformism in the political communication of Nashi, 2005–2009. Ibidem, Stuttgart
Malek M (2004) Rußlands Kriege in Tschetschenien. “Wiederherstellung der verfassungsmäßigen Ordnung”, “Antiterror-Operation” oder Völkermord? Zeitschrift für Genozidforschung 5(1):101–129
Melkojanz G (2013) Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Staat in Russland: aus der Geschichte in die Moderne. Russland-Analysen 265:2–6, 25 October. http://www.laender-analysen.de/russland/pdf/RusslandAnalysen265.pdf
Minssen I (2012) The quest for an ideal youth in Putin’s Russia I. Back to our future! History, modernity and patriotism according to Nashi, 2005–2012. ibidem, Stuttgart
Mommsen M (2010) Oligarchie und Autokratie. Das hybride politische System Russlands. Osteuropa 60(8):25–46
Putin V (2007) The unipolar model is unacceptable in today’s world. http://www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Sicherheitskonferenz/2007-putin.html.
Ross C (2014) Das Paradox: Putins populäre Autokratie. Legitimitätsquellen in einem hybriden Regime. Osteuropa 64(8):99–112
Sakwa R (2010) The crisis of Russian democracy. The dual state, factionalism and the Medvedev succession. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York
Sapper M, Weichsel V (eds) (2012) Auge auf! Aufbruch und Regression in Rußland. Osteuropa 62(6–8):7–550
Schulze PW (2007) Souveräne Demokratie: Kampfbegriff oder Hilfskonstruktion für einen eigenständigen Entwicklungsweg?—die ideologische Offensive des Vladislav Surkov. In: Buhbe M, Gorzka G (eds) Russland heute. Rezentralisierung des Staates unter Putin. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 293–313
Schulze PW (2012) Genesis und Perspektiven des politischen Systems in Russland. In: Erler G, Schulze PW (eds) Die Europäisierung Russlands. Moskau zwischen Modernisierungspartnerschaft und Großmachtrolle. Campus, New York, Frankfurt a M, pp. 33–114
Shevcova L (2007) Russia. Lost in transition. The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies. Carnegie Endowment, Moskau
White S (ed) (2011) Understanding Russian politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY
Wischnewjskij B (2014) Unterschätzte Macht des knurrenden Magens. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 14 August, http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/putin-unter-druck-unterschaetzte-macht-des-knurrenden-magen-1.2086829
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jahn, E. (2015). The Castling of Presidential Functions by Vladimir Putin. In: International Politics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47685-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47685-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47684-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47685-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)