Abstract
This paper presents the results from studying the effect of the use of computational tools on designers’ behavior in terms of using design patterns in the conceptual development stage of designing. The results are based on a protocol study in which architectural designers were asked to complete two architectural design tasks with similar complexity, one in a parametric design environment and one in a geometric modeling environment. To explore the development of design patterns during the design process, the technique of 2nd order Markov model was used. The results suggest that there were more design patterns adopted in the parametric design environment than in the geometric modeling environment. Also, there are more design patterns related to structure in the parametric design environment than in the geometric modeling environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)
Chen, S.-C.: The role of design creativity in computer media. In: Architectural information management, 30th eCAADe conference, Helsinki, Finland (2001)
Mitchell, W.J.: Beyond Productivity: Information Technology. Innovation and Creativity, Washington, DC (2003)
Black, A.: Visible planning on paper and on screen. Behav. Info. Technol. 9(4), 283–296 (1990)
Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)
Bilda, Z., Demirkan, H.: An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Des. Stud. 24(1), 27–50 (2003)
Fallman, D.: Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: 21th ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florida, USA (2003)
Kim, M.J., Maher, M.L.: The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Des. Stud. 29(3), 222\xE2\x80\x93253 (2008)
Gero, J., Tang, H.-H.: concurrent and retrospective protocols and computer-aided architectural design. In: 4th CAADRIA conference, Shanghai (1999)
Oxman, R.: Design media for the cognitive designer. Autom. Constr. 9(4), 337–346 (2000)
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: The effect of computer mediation on collaborative designing, in between man and MACHINE? Integration, Intuition, Intelligence. In: Proceedings of 14th CAADRIA conference, Yunlin, Taiwan (2009)
Woodbury, R.: Elements of Parametric Design. Routledge, New York (2010)
Kolarevic, B.: Architecture in the Digital Age: Design And Manufacturing. Spon Press, New York (2003)
Gero, J.S.: Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag. 11(4), 26–36 (1990)
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Using the FBS ontology to capture semantic design information in design protocol studies. In: McDonnell, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.) About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings, pp. 213–229. Taylor & Francis, New York (2009)
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing? In: Digital Opportunities, 10th CAADRIA conference, New Delhi, India (2005)
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Des. Stud. 29(4), 315–337 (2008)
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Studing software design cognition, In: Petre, M., Hoek, AVd (eds.) Software Designers in Action: A Human-Centric Look at Design Work. Chapman Hall, London (2009)
Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Mass (1993)
Gero, J.S., Mc Neill, T.: An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Des. Stud. 19(1), 21–61 (1998)
Atman, C.J., et al.: A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Des. Stud. 20(2), 131–152 (1999)
Suwa, M., Tversky, B.: What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Des. Stud. 18(4), 385–403 (1997)
Akin, O.: Psychology of Architectural Design. Pion, London (1986)
Gero, J., Tang, H.-H.: The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process. Des. Stud. 22(3), 283–295 (2001)
Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J.: Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des. Stud. 16(2), 261–274 (1995)
Kuusela, H., Pallab, P.: A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am. J. Psychol. 113(3), 387–404 (2000)
Ching, W.K., Ng, M.K.: Markov Chains: Models, Algorithms and Applications. Springer, New York (2006)
Meyn, S.P., Tweedie, R.L.: Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Exploring quantitative methods to study design behavior in collaborative virtual workspaces. In: New Frontiers, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on CAADRIA (2010)
Jiang, H.: Understanding senior design students’ product conceptual design activities—a comparison between industrial and engineering design students. National University of Singapore, Singapore (2012)
Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: Commonalities across designing: empirical results. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, College Station (2014)
Gero, J.S., Jiang, H., Vieira, S.: Exploring a multi-meeting engineering design project. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R.V. (eds.) ICoRD’13 conference, Springer, India (2013)
Kim, M.J.: The effects of tangible user interfaces on designers’ spatial cognition key centre of design computing and cognition. Faculty of Architecture, Doctor of Philosophy (2006)
Nguyen, L., Shanks, G.: Using protocol analysis to explore the creative requirements engineering process. Information Systems Foundations Workshop, pp. 133–151. ANUE Press, Canberra (2006)
Pourmohamadi, M., Gero, J.S.: LINKOgrapher: An analysis tool to study design protocols based on FBS coding scheme. In: Culley, S., et al. (eds.) Design Theory and Methodology, pp. 294–303. Design Society, Glasgow (2011)
Fowler, M.: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Gamma, E., et al.: Design patterns: abstraction and reuse of object-oriented design. In: Manfred, B., Ernst, D. (eds.) Software Pioneers, pp. 701–717. Springer, New York (2002)
Alexander, C.: The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)
Razzouk, R., Shute, V.: What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Rev. Educ. Res. 82(3), 330–348 (2012)
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1161715. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yu, R., Gero, J. (2015). Design Patterns from Empirical Studies in Computer-Aided Design. In: Celani, G., Sperling, D., Franco, J. (eds) Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. The Next City - New Technologies and the Future of the Built Environment. CAAD Futures 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 527. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47385-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47386-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)