Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 527))

Abstract

This paper presents the results from studying the effect of the use of computational tools on designers’ behavior in terms of using design patterns in the conceptual development stage of designing. The results are based on a protocol study in which architectural designers were asked to complete two architectural design tasks with similar complexity, one in a parametric design environment and one in a geometric modeling environment. To explore the development of design patterns during the design process, the technique of 2nd order Markov model was used. The results suggest that there were more design patterns adopted in the parametric design environment than in the geometric modeling environment. Also, there are more design patterns related to structure in the parametric design environment than in the geometric modeling environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, S.-C.: The role of design creativity in computer media. In: Architectural information management, 30th eCAADe conference, Helsinki, Finland (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, W.J.: Beyond Productivity: Information Technology. Innovation and Creativity, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Black, A.: Visible planning on paper and on screen. Behav. Info. Technol. 9(4), 283–296 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilda, Z., Demirkan, H.: An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Des. Stud. 24(1), 27–50 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fallman, D.: Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: 21th ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florida, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, M.J., Maher, M.L.: The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Des. Stud. 29(3), 222\xE2\x80\x93253 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gero, J., Tang, H.-H.: concurrent and retrospective protocols and computer-aided architectural design. In: 4th CAADRIA conference, Shanghai (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oxman, R.: Design media for the cognitive designer. Autom. Constr. 9(4), 337–346 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: The effect of computer mediation on collaborative designing, in between man and MACHINE? Integration, Intuition, Intelligence. In: Proceedings of 14th CAADRIA conference, Yunlin, Taiwan (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Woodbury, R.: Elements of Parametric Design. Routledge, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolarevic, B.: Architecture in the Digital Age: Design And Manufacturing. Spon Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gero, J.S.: Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag. 11(4), 26–36 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Using the FBS ontology to capture semantic design information in design protocol studies. In: McDonnell, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.) About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings, pp. 213–229. Taylor & Francis, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing? In: Digital Opportunities, 10th CAADRIA conference, New Delhi, India (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Des. Stud. 29(4), 315–337 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Studing software design cognition, In: Petre, M., Hoek, AVd (eds.) Software Designers in Action: A Human-Centric Look at Design Work. Chapman Hall, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Mass (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gero, J.S., Mc Neill, T.: An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Des. Stud. 19(1), 21–61 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Atman, C.J., et al.: A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Des. Stud. 20(2), 131–152 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suwa, M., Tversky, B.: What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Des. Stud. 18(4), 385–403 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akin, O.: Psychology of Architectural Design. Pion, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gero, J., Tang, H.-H.: The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process. Des. Stud. 22(3), 283–295 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J.: Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des. Stud. 16(2), 261–274 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuusela, H., Pallab, P.: A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am. J. Psychol. 113(3), 387–404 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ching, W.K., Ng, M.K.: Markov Chains: Models, Algorithms and Applications. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meyn, S.P., Tweedie, R.L.: Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Exploring quantitative methods to study design behavior in collaborative virtual workspaces. In: New Frontiers, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on CAADRIA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, H.: Understanding senior design students’ product conceptual design activities—a comparison between industrial and engineering design students. National University of Singapore, Singapore (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: Commonalities across designing: empirical results. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, College Station (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gero, J.S., Jiang, H., Vieira, S.: Exploring a multi-meeting engineering design project. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R.V. (eds.) ICoRD’13 conference, Springer, India (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, M.J.: The effects of tangible user interfaces on designers’ spatial cognition key centre of design computing and cognition. Faculty of Architecture, Doctor of Philosophy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nguyen, L., Shanks, G.: Using protocol analysis to explore the creative requirements engineering process. Information Systems Foundations Workshop, pp. 133–151. ANUE Press, Canberra (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pourmohamadi, M., Gero, J.S.: LINKOgrapher: An analysis tool to study design protocols based on FBS coding scheme. In: Culley, S., et al. (eds.) Design Theory and Methodology, pp. 294–303. Design Society, Glasgow (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fowler, M.: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gamma, E., et al.: Design patterns: abstraction and reuse of object-oriented design. In: Manfred, B., Ernst, D. (eds.) Software Pioneers, pp. 701–717. Springer, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Alexander, C.: The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Razzouk, R., Shute, V.: What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Rev. Educ. Res. 82(3), 330–348 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1161715. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongrong Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, R., Gero, J. (2015). Design Patterns from Empirical Studies in Computer-Aided Design. In: Celani, G., Sperling, D., Franco, J. (eds) Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. The Next City - New Technologies and the Future of the Built Environment. CAAD Futures 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 527. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47385-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47386-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics