Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 362))

Abstract

Consensus plays a key role in group decision making where the participants in a group want to achieve some predefined degree of accordance. In this paper, based on the 2-tuple linguistic model, a consensus reaching process for multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problem is introduced. Then a classical VIKOR method is extended based on the consensus process. Therefore, an intergraded MADGM approach combining the consensus process and VIKOR method is presented. Finally, a numerical example is illustrated to validate the practicality of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2014) The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context. Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-014-1576-8

  2. Alonso S, Pérez IJ et al (2013) A linguistic consensus model for web 2 communities. Appl Soft Comput 13:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F et al (2013) Challenges and open questions in soft consensus models. In: Proceeding of IFSA/NAFIPS, pp 944–949

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrerizo FJ, Moreno JM et al (2010) Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Comput 14:451–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiclana F, Tapia García JM et al (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong YC, Fan ZP, Yu S (2014) Consensus building in a local context for the AHP-GDM with the individual numerical scale and prioritization method. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2312974

  7. Dong YC, Li CC et al (2014) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decision and Negotiation. doi:10.1007/s10726-014-9387-5

  8. Dong YC, Xu YF, Yu S (2009) Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:1366–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu C, Yang SL (2012) An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval valued group consensus requirements. Eur J Oper Res 223:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ et al (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8:746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levrat E, Voisin A et al (1997) Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy techniques. Int J Intell Syst 12:891–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Massanet S, Riera JV et al (2014) A new linguistic computational model based on discrete fuzzy numbers for computing with words. Inf Sci 258:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Opricovic S (1998) Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  15. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 17:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Ope Res 156:445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Palomares I, Estrella FJ et al (2014) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fusion 20:252–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palomares I, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2014) A semi-supervised multi-agent system model to support consensus reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:762–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parreiras RO, Ekel P et al (2010) A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf Sci 180:1075–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parreiras RO, Ekel P, Morais DC (2012) Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis Negot 21:153–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park JH, Gwak MG, Kwun YC (2011) Uncertain linguistic harmonic mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Computing 93:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roselló L, Sánchez M et al (2014) Using consensus and distances between generalized multi-attribute linguistic assessments for group decision-making. Inf Fusion 17:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Srdjevic B, Srdjevic Z et al (2013) A two-phase algorithm for consensus building in AHP-group decision making. Appl Math Model 37:6670–6682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu ZB, Ahmad J, Xu JP (2014) A group decision making framework based on fuzzy VIKOR approach for machine tool selection with linguistic information. Technical report

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) Consensus reaching models of linguistic preference relations based on distance functions. Soft Comput 16:577–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu JP, Wu ZB, Zhang Y (2014) A consensus based method for multi-criteria group decision making under uncertain linguistic setting. Group Decis Negot 23:127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71301110) and the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education (Grant No. 13XJC630015) and also supported by Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20130181120059) and supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibin Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, Z., Xu, K., Zhong, L. (2015). A Consensus Based VIKOR Method Using the 2-Tuple Linguistic Model. In: Xu, J., Nickel, S., Machado, V., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 362. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47241-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47241-5_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47240-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47241-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics