Skip to main content

A Comparison Approach for Accuracy Feature of Requirements Prioritization Models

  • Conference paper
Book cover Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 349))

  • 4284 Accesses

Abstract

As the quality of software defined by the users satisfaction, in order to maximize the users satisfaction under constrains of budget, time and resource, the software engineer need to prioritize the requirements. Requirement prioritization involves identifying the core requirements used for project planning. This article proposes a method to compare the accuracy of requirement prioritization model. The subjects include customers, project leaders, users and the representatives of developer such as programmers and testers. They have to select a related list of requirements among two sets of requirements. Those pair lists of requirements have to be the same order from difference prioritizing models. Whereas, the subjects don’t realize those which requirements are belong to which practical model. The main objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of a proposed model with a reference model. The results show that the proposed approach provides precise measurement of accuracy for prioritizing model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hatton, S.: Choosing the Right Prioritization Method. In: Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 517–526 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carod, N., Cechich, A.: Requirements Prioritization Techniques. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 2nd edn., pp. 3283–3291. IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hasan, M.S., et al.: An Evaluation of Software Requirement Prioritization Techniques. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 83–94 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Firesmith, D.: Prioritizing Requirements. Journal of Object Technology, 35–47 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karlsson, L., Thelin, T., Regnell, B., Berander, P., Wohlin, C.: Pair-wise comparisons versus planning game partitioning–experiments on requirements prioritisation techniques. Journal of Empirical Software Engineering 12(1), 3–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perini, A., Ricca, F., Susi, A., Bazzanella, C.: An Empirical Study to Compare the Accuracy of AHP and CBRanking Techniques for Requirements Prioritization. In: Fifth International Workshops on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenjira Jaimunk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaimunk, J., Sureephong, P. (2015). A Comparison Approach for Accuracy Feature of Requirements Prioritization Models. In: Gen, M., Kim, K., Huang, X., Hiroshi, Y. (eds) Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47200-2_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47200-2_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47199-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47200-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics