Abstract
Successfully implementing projects accelerate organizational growth. Given the limited organizational resources available, project funding is a critical strategic decision to ensure the most appropriate projects are selected. Recent research suggests that a proposed project’s target benefits—those anticipated to be realized at project completion—are important to consider when making decisions for project funding. Yet, the literature provides few measures to appraise the quality of target benefits. Consequently, sub-optimal projects are funded due to estimations errors, optimism bias about the future (“planning fallacy”) and strategic misrepresentation of target benefits. This paper presents three studies to develop and validate a new “Quality of Target Benefits” (QTB) scale consisting of three dimensions: specificity, attainability, and comprehensiveness. This scale can be used practically—that is, to objectively appraise a proposed project’s target benefits and to support an informed funding decision. It can also be used theoretically—as an instrument to facilitate theory development in areas of decision making, organizational strategy implementation, and project performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ansar, A., Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A., Lunn, D.: Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy (2014) (forthcoming), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.069i
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(5), 732 (1991)
Ashurst, C., Doherty, N.F., Peppard, J.: Improving the impact of IT development projects: The benefits realization capability model. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 352–370 (2008)
Australian Department of Finance and Deregulation, “Assurance Review Process - Lessons Learned Benefits Realisation Management”. Australian Government (2012)
Breese, R.: Benefit realisation management: Panacea or false dawn? International Journal of Project Management 30, 341–351 (2012)
Brislin, R.W.: Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: Triandis, H.C., Berry, J.W. (eds.) Methodology, vol. 2. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, pp. 349–444. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1980)
Carr, C., Kolehmainen, K., Mitchell, F.: Strategic investment decision making practices: A contextual approach. Management Accounting Research 21(3), 167–184 (2010)
Cats-Baril, W., Thompson, R.: Managing Information Technology Projects in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review 55(6), 559–566 (1995)
Churchill, G.A.: A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16, 64–73 (1979)
Crosby, P.B.: Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. New American Library, New York (1979)
Doran, G.: There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review 70(11), 35–36 (1981)
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M.K.S., Buhl, S.L.: How (In)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? Journal of the American Planning Association 71(2), 131–146 (2005)
Flyvbjerg, B.: Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: problems, causes, cures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34, 578–597 (2007)
Flyvbjerg, B.: Quality control and due diligence in project management: Getting decisions right by taking the outside view. International Journal of Project Management 31, 760–774 (2013)
Gershon, P.: Review of Australian Government’s Use of Information and Communication Technology. Department of Finance and Deregulation, Australian Government, Parkes (2008)
Gimbert, X., Bisbe, J., Mendoza, X.: The role of performance measurement systems in strategy formulation processes. Long Range Planning 43(4), 477–497 (2010)
Grushka-Cockayne, Y., De Reyck, B., Degraeve, Z.: An integrated decision-making approach for improving European air traffic management. Management Science 54(8), 1395–1409 (2008)
Henderson, J., Ruikar, K.: Technology implementation strategies for construction organisations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 17(3), 309–327 (2010)
Hinkin, T.R.: A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods 1(1), 104–121 (1998)
Irani, Z., Love, P.: The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information System 17, 161–177 (2001)
Jenner, S.: Realising Benefits from Government ICT Investment—AFool’s Errand? Academic Publishing, Reading (2009)
Jørgensen, M., Halkjelsvik, T., Kitchenham, B.: How does project size affect cost estimation error? Statistical artifacts and methodological challenges. International Journal of Project Management 30(7), 839–849 (2012)
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow, 1st edn. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 263–291 (1979)
Kerlinger, F.N.: Foundations of behavioral research. CBS Publishing Limited, Japan (1986)
Lechner, C., Floyd, S.W.: Group influence activities and the performance of strategic initiatives. Strategic Management Journal 33(5), 478–495 (2012)
Li, S., Rao, S.S., Ragu-Nathan, T.S., Ragu-Nathan, B.: Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices. Journal of Operations Management 23(6), 618–641 (2005)
Lin, C., Pervan, G.: The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations. Information Management 41, 13–24 (2003)
Linderbaum, B.A., Levy, P.E.: The development and validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management 36(6), 1372–1405 (2010)
Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57(9), 705–717 (2002)
Mihm, J.: Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Management Science 56(8), 1324–1344 (2010)
Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1994)
Norris, G.D.: Post-investment appraisal. In: Willcocks, L. (ed.) Investing in Information Systems: Evaluation and Management, pp. 193–223. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (1996)
Nicholson-Crotty, S., Theobald, N., Nicholson-Crotty, J.: Disparate Measures: Public Managers and Performance-Measurement Strategies. Public Administration Review 66(1), 101–113 (2006)
Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)
Pellegrinelli, S., Bowman, C.: Implementing strategy through projects. Long Range Planning 27, 125–132 (1994)
Papadakis, V.M.: Strategic investment decision processes and organizational performance: an empirical examination. British Journal of Management 9(2), 115–132 (1998)
Raghunathan, S.: Impact of information quality and decision-maker quality on decision quality: a theoretical model and simulation analysis. Decision Support Systems 26(4), 275–286 (1999)
Reeves, C.A., Bednar, D.A.: Defining quality: alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review 19(3), 419–445 (1994)
Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J.C., Santora, J.C.: Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management Studies 45(2), 402–424 (2008)
Shapira, Z., Shaver, J.M.: Confounding changes in averages with marginal effects: How anchoring can destroy economic value in strategic investment assessments. Strategic Management Journal (2013), doi:10.1002/smj.2165
Shenhar, A.J.: One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 47, 394–414 (2001)
Verbeeten, F.H.M.: Performance management practices in public sector organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(3), 427–454 (2008)
Ward, J., Daniel, E.: Benefits Management: Delivering Value from IS & IT Investments. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2006)
Weick, M., Guinote, A.: How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 595–604 (2010)
ZengJ, A.M., Smith, N.J.: Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management 25(6), 589–600 (2007)
Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C., Griffin, M.: Business Research Methods, 8th edn. South-Western Cengage Learning (2010)
Zwikael, O., Smyrk, J.R.: A general framework for gauging the performance of initiatives to enhance organizational value. British Journal of Management 23, S6–S22 (2012)
Zwikael, O., Smyrk, J.R.: Project Management for the Creation of Organisational Value. Springer, London (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zwikael, O., Chih, YY. (2015). Enhancing Project Funding Decision Quality. In: Gen, M., Kim, K., Huang, X., Hiroshi, Y. (eds) Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47200-2_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47200-2_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47199-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47200-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)