Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Operative Specimen Handling and Evaluation of Resection Margins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract

Specimen grossing is a key step in the pathology examination of pancreatic resection specimens. Specimen dissection with optimal display of pathological changes and extensive tissue sampling are important determinants of the quality of pathology reporting. This chapter provides a detailed discussion of the macroscopic examination procedure and assessment of the specimen margins with reference to current (inter-)national guidelines and recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feakins R, Campbell F, Verbeke CS. Survey of UK histopathologists’ approach to the reporting of resection specimens for carcinomas of the pancreatic head. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:715–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Westgaard A, Laronningen S, Mellem C, Eide TJ, Clausen OP, Møller B, et al. Are survival predictions reliable? Hospital volume versus standardisation of histopathologic reporting for accuracy of survival estimates after pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2850–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP. Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1036–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrasegaram MD, Goldstein D, Simes J, Gebski V, Kench JG, Gill AJ, et al. Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1459–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell F, Foulis AK, Verbeke CS. Dataset for the histopathological reporting of carcinomas of the pancreas, ampulla of Vater and common bile duct. The Royal College of Pathologists; 2010. Available from: www.rcpath.org.

  6. Cancer of the Exocrine Pancreas, Ampulla of Vater and Distal Common Bile Duct. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia; 2014. Available from: https://www.rcpa.edu.au/.

  7. Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Heinemann V, Tannapfel A, Stuschke M, Uhl W. Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:396–402.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology; 2015. Available from: www.nccn.org/patients.

  9. Verbeke CS. Resection margins in pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:647–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell F, Verbeke CS. Pathology of the pancreas – a practical approach. London: Springer; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson H, Hunt KK, Veeramachaneni N, Blair S, Chang G, Halverson A, et al. Operative standards for cancer surgery. Volume 1: breast, lung, pancreas, colon. American College of Surgeons and the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia; 2015. p. 181–272.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagakawa T, Sanada H, Inagaki M, Sugama J, Ueno K, Konishi I, et al. Long-term survivors after resection of carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: significance of histologically curative resection. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:402–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Adsay NV, Basturk O, Saka B, Bagci P, Ozdemir D, Balci S, et al. Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:480–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1232–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, Reiser C, Herpel E, Friess H, et al. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1651–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, Going JJ, Glen P, Dickson EJ, et al. Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1003–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Björnstedt M, Franzén L, Glaumann H, Nordlinder H, Palmqvist R, Rissler P, et al. Gastrointestinal pathology pancreas and peri-ampullary region. KVAST Study Group for hepatopancreatobiliary pathology; 2012. Available from http://www.svfp.se/leverpankreaspatologi.

  18. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: American Joint Committee on Cancer: Springer-Verlag; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hruban RH, Klimstra DS, Pitman MB. Tumors of the pancreas. AFIP atlas of tumor pathology. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology in collaboration with the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Verbeke CS, Knapp J, Gladhaug IP. Tumour growth is more dispersed in pancreatic head cancers than in rectal cancer: implications for resection margin assessment. Histopathology. 2011;59:1111–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Verbeke C. Morphological heterogeneity in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas – does it matter? Pancreatology. 2016;16:295–301. Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Verbeke C, Sheridan M, Scarsbrook A, Albazaz R, Smith A, Menon K, et al. How accurate is size assessment of pancreatic head cancers by radiology and pathology? Pancreatology. 2010;10:300.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamposioras K, Anthoney A, Fernández Moro C, Cairns A, Smith AM, Liaskos C, et al. Impact of intrapancreatic or extrapancreatic bile duct involvement on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for common bile duct cancer. Br J Surg. 2014;101:89–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim J, Reber HA, Dry SM, Elashoff D, Chen SL, Umetani N, et al. Unfavourable prognosis associated with K-ras gene mutation in pancreatic cancer surgical margins. Gut. 2006;55:1598–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Washington K, Berlin J, Branton P, Burgart LJ, Carter DK, Compton CC, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas. Coll Am Pathol. 2013;. Available from: www.cap.org.

  28. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, et al. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:327–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang DK, Johns AL, Merrett ND, Gill AJ, Colvin EK, Scarlett CJ, et al. Margin clearance and outcome in resected pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Verbeke C, Löhr M, Karlsson JS, Del Chiaro M. Pathology reporting of pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: challenges and uncertainties. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:17–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Øystein H. Horgmo, medical illustrator, University of Oslo, for the assistance with the illustrations.

Disclosure Statement

The author has no conflicting interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Caroline Sophie Verbeke

  2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Caroline Sophie Verbeke

Authors
  1. Caroline Sophie Verbeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Sophie Verbeke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Sun-Whe Kim

  2. Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

    Hiroki Yamaue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verbeke, C.S. (2017). Operative Specimen Handling and Evaluation of Resection Margins. In: Kim, SW., Yamaue, H. (eds) Pancreatic Cancer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47181-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47181-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47180-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47181-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation