Zusammenfassung
Im sechsten Kapitel befassen wir uns mit der Evaluation, die in den Prozesszyklen (zum Beispiel dem PDCA) als abschließende Tätigkeit einer Intervention erscheint. Evaluation steht aber nicht nur am Ende der Prozesskette als summative Bewertung der Interventionswirkung, sie beginnt vielmehr bereits mit der Planung einer Intervention. In diesem Kapitel stellen wir drei Typen und vier Generationen der Evaluation vor und zeigen, welche Methoden zu welchem Evaluationsanlass passen, erläutern gängige Methoden und beschreiben drei Evaluationsmodelle näher.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2013). An evaluation theory tree. In M. C. Alkin (Hrsg.), Evaluation roots. (S. 12–66). London: Sage.
Bank, V., & Lames, M. (2010). Über Evaluation (2. Aufl.). Chemnitz: Universität Chemnitz.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Chen, H.-T. (1990). The theory-driven evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C. (2011). A systematic review of theory driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32, 199–226.
Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Eisner, E. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their form and function in educational evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Evaluation or Education, 10, 135–150.
Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, D. A., & Wandersman, A. (1995). Empowerment evaluation. Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327.
Green, J., & Tones, J. (1999). Towards a secure evidence base for health promotion. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 21, 133–139.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy. Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahlert, D. & Schlicht, W. (submitted). Pedestrian friendliness of older people in the living environment and assessed traffic safety. An experimental study using computer-simulated living environments.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs – the four Levels (3. Aufl.). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Köhler.
Kleist, P. (2010). Wann ist ein Studienergebnis klinisch relevant? Was Maßzahlen zur Beurteilung von Therapieeffekten aussagen. Schweizer Medizinisches Forum, 32, 525–527.
Owens, T. R., & Wolf, R. L. (1985). An adversary approach to evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, & A. J. Shinkfield (Hrsg.), Systematic Evaluation (S. 265). Dordrecht: Kluwer-Niehoff Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-Focussed Evaluation. Beverly Hills & London: Sage.
Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2004). Evaluation. A systematic approach (7. Aufl.). Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Schneidewind, U., & Borowski, M. (2013). Transformative Wissenschaft. Marburg: Metropolis.
Scriven, M. (1972). The methodology of evaluation. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Shadish, W., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, T. D. (2001). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houston Mifflin Company.
Stake, R. E. (1980). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In W. B. Dockwell, & D. Hamilton (Hrsg.), Rethinking educational research (S. 72–87). London: Sage.
Stufflebeam, D., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation: theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluation research. NewYork: Sage.
Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., & Chalkidou, K. (2009). A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 464–475.
Tyler, R. W. (1942). General statement on evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 35, 492–501.
Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluation Research. Methods for assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlicht, W., Zinsmeister, M. (2015). Messen, bewerten, beschreiben, informieren. In: Gesundheitsförderung systematisch planen und effektiv intervenieren. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46989-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46989-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46988-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46989-7
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)